FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045068893> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045068893 endingPage "416" @default.
• W2045068893 startingPage "414" @default.
• W2045068893 abstract "Reviewed by: A Secession Crisis Enigma: William Henry Hurlbert and “The Diary of a Public Man.” by Daniel W. Crofts Michael S. Green (bio) A Secession Crisis Enigma: William Henry Hurlbert and “The Diary of a Public Man.” By Daniel W. Crofts. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2010. Pp. 292. Cloth, $42.50.) When this book arrived for review, my leisure reading was Rex Stout’s Nero Wolfe mysteries—an appropriate choice, it turned out. Daniel W. Crofts has set out to solve one of the great mysteries of Civil War political history and brought to the task the tools of the historian and the detective, as well as the stylometrist. In 1879, the North American Review published “The Diary of a Public Man,” or “unpublished passages of the secret history [End Page 414] of the American Civil War.” Intimately familiar with leading political figures of the time, the author remained anonymous, leaving readers and subsequent historians to ponder his identity and generating doubts that the diary was genuine. Frank Anderson, who devoted a large chunk of his scholarly career to solving this mystery, concluded that the author was Sam Ward, a writer and political insider. Unconvinced, Daniel Crofts sets out to solve the mystery once and for all. In addition to his own great expertise in the coming of the Civil War as the author or editor of several works on the secession winter, Crofts turned to a colleague who employed stylometry, a method of analyzing literary style with statistics and computer programs, to determine that the diary was “seamless”—the work of one person (28). He compared the writings of several possible authors with “The Diary of a Public Man” to determine predilections toward alliteration and the use of modifiers, both to prove who wrote the diary and to eliminate possibilities. Crofts believes Anderson missed the mark, albeit barely. Ward undoubtedly provided information to the author, who simply could not have been in all of the places and known all of the people central to the diary. The author, Crofts concludes, was Ward’s longtime friend and sometime enemy William Henry Hurlbert, who was similarly well wired politically and boasted a wealth of journalistic experience with, among others, the New York Times and the New York World. Indeed, that Hurlbert worked for a moderately conservative Republican daily and then a leading Democratic voice speaks to his skills as a writer and navigator of treacherous political waters—both requirements for completing the diary, as Crofts makes clear. The diary mentions or relies on politicians and journalists in Hurlbert’s orbit, much more so than those in Ward’s. It was written after the fact and brings together diverse sources, so its author needed to have literary talent of the kind Hurlbert demonstrated. Since the diarist takes a moderate position on most issues, Hurlbert fits the diary ideologically, thanks to his upbringing in the North and South and what his critics considered his general lack of principle on political issues. Indeed, that lack of principle lies at the heart of Crofts’s fascinating dissection of Hurlbert’s life. One escapade took Hurlbert south during the Civil War and earned him a year’s residence in a Confederate prison, but suspicions arose that he had acted not out of journalistic curiosity, but to cast his lot with the rebels. Both before and after the war, his dalliances with a variety of women caused scandals that cost him friendships, money, job opportunities, and professional respect. Crofts weaves these threads of an unusual life into a cohesive whole to explain the manner of mind and man that could have written the diary. [End Page 415] Naturally, a few quibbles are in order. To call the Liberal Republicans and mugwumps “holier-than-thou” is punchy but simplistic, and Crofts’s depiction of William Henry Seward’s peace efforts during the secession winter could be more nuanced (79). In trying to reconstruct Hurlbert’s life, Crofts might have delved more deeply into the journalistic history to explain what made Hurlbert both unique and commonplace in his access to information and how he wrote about it. Many reporters in that era dealt regularly with the..." @default.
• W2045068893 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045068893 creator A5005419518 @default.
• W2045068893 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2045068893 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2045068893 title "A Secession Crisis Enigma: William Henry Hurlbert and “The Diary of a Public Man.” by Daniel W. Crofts" @default.
• W2045068893 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cwe.2013.0047" @default.
• W2045068893 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2045068893 type Work @default.
• W2045068893 sameAs 2045068893 @default.
• W2045068893 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2045068893 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045068893 hasAuthorship W2045068893A5005419518 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C2780857596 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C81631423 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C124952713 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C142362112 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C144024400 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C17744445 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C199539241 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C2780857596 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C74916050 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C81631423 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C94625758 @default.
• W2045068893 hasConceptScore W2045068893C95457728 @default.
• W2045068893 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2045068893 hasLocation W20450688931 @default.
• W2045068893 hasOpenAccess W2045068893 @default.
• W2045068893 hasPrimaryLocation W20450688931 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W2048230465 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W2288494885 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W2328569034 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W2888222074 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W3121304467 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W3124793408 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W3124982044 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W4327780081 @default.
• W2045068893 hasRelatedWork W2462788582 @default.
• W2045068893 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2045068893 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045068893 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045068893 magId "2045068893" @default.
• W2045068893 workType "article" @default.