FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045184434> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045184434 abstract "Abstract Although, WAG has been studied and implemented widely for hydrocarbon recovery improvement, still there are some uncertainties regarding flow dynamics in the three-phase region. One of the most important uncertainty areas is modeling of three phase relative permeability in this region. Commercial simulators by using conventional three phase models cannot capture all the features and mechanisms behind the three phase flow. Hysteresis is one of the phenomenons, which is still remained controversial in three phase relative permeability models. Some of the current relative permeability models have accounted for this phenomenon and in others, hysteresis effect is lacking. Two phase models usually fail to predict the actual behavior of the hysteresis in three phase flow. Some of the three phase models also take in to account the features of hysteresis but not all of them. In the simulation process of water alternating gas, hysteresis modeling is a corner stone of the workflow. If this work step is not done properly, the results of the simulation study may not necessarily capture different aspects of the WAG injection scenario and the results could be mis-leading affecting the business decision. In this study, first an extensive parametric paper review and literature survey has been done on hysteretic two and three phase relative permeability models following by a comparative analysis. Parametric investigation is carried out and the advantages and disadvantages of the models are discussed. The model predictions versus selected experimental data are shown and the discrepancies are highlighted. The onset point to improve the model prediction is declared and finally to show the hysteresis effect on oil recovery a simulation case is done using a synthetic sector model. The discussion in this study show that by properly modeling the WAG process and taking into account the hysteresis phenomenon, the robustness of the results on incremental hydrocarbon recovery by WAG process can be significantly improved. It can be concluded that the simulation results using the commercial simulator can be mis-leading in term of the WAG injection performance if hysteresis modeling is not properly done and applied. Introduction Dependency of the global economy on oil and gas resources cannot be ignored. Although, these energy resources are finite and likely to decline, enhanced oil recovery has a significant role to improve the sustainable energy supply. With the ongoing advancement in technical methodologies and technology applications, EOR processes that are complex in nature and characteristic behavior, needs especial attention. Water alternating gas (WAG) is one of the EOR methods, which is increasingly becomes popular due to the successful field trials reported in the literature (Christensen, Stenby et al. 2001). WAG originally implemented to boost the recovery of conventional gas injection by using water cycles to control gas mobility. Although WAG process is widely applied worldwide, there are some uncertainty areas in the evaluation of WAG behavior like prediction of three phase relative permeability during the injection cycles." @default.
• W2045184434 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045184434 creator A5020684150 @default.
• W2045184434 creator A5040607361 @default.
• W2045184434 creator A5061383520 @default.
• W2045184434 creator A5068730476 @default.
• W2045184434 creator A5087321220 @default.
• W2045184434 date "2011-11-15" @default.
• W2045184434 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2045184434 title "Investigating the Effect of Hysteresis modelling on Numerical Simulation of Immiscible WAG Injection" @default.
• W2045184434 doi "https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-15055-ms" @default.
• W2045184434 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2045184434 type Work @default.
• W2045184434 sameAs 2045184434 @default.
• W2045184434 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2045184434 countsByYear W20451844342017 @default.
• W2045184434 countsByYear W20451844342018 @default.
• W2045184434 countsByYear W20451844342019 @default.
• W2045184434 countsByYear W20451844342020 @default.
• W2045184434 countsByYear W20451844342021 @default.
• W2045184434 countsByYear W20451844342022 @default.
• W2045184434 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2045184434 hasAuthorship W2045184434A5020684150 @default.
• W2045184434 hasAuthorship W2045184434A5040607361 @default.
• W2045184434 hasAuthorship W2045184434A5061383520 @default.
• W2045184434 hasAuthorship W2045184434A5068730476 @default.
• W2045184434 hasAuthorship W2045184434A5087321220 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C108215451 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C113378726 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C117251300 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C120882062 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C123299182 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C144308804 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C2779379648 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C38349280 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C41625074 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C44280652 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConcept C6648577 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C105795698 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C108215451 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C113378726 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C117251300 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C120882062 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C121332964 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C123299182 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C127413603 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C144237770 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C144308804 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C185592680 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C187320778 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C2779379648 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C33923547 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C38349280 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C41008148 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C41625074 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C44280652 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C55493867 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C57879066 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C62520636 @default.
• W2045184434 hasConceptScore W2045184434C6648577 @default.
• W2045184434 hasLocation W20451844341 @default.
• W2045184434 hasOpenAccess W2045184434 @default.
• W2045184434 hasPrimaryLocation W20451844341 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W1972685607 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W1991374235 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W2050380500 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W2323233821 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W2376873435 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W2728276482 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W2744202861 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W2942635600 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W3202680735 @default.
• W2045184434 hasRelatedWork W2184016356 @default.
• W2045184434 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045184434 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045184434 magId "2045184434" @default.
• W2045184434 workType "article" @default.