FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045346095> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045346095 endingPage "2204" @default.
• W2045346095 startingPage "2198" @default.
• W2045346095 abstract "Purpose Microvascular fibula harvesting for osseous reconstruction is a valuable aid in maxillofacial surgery. We assessed whether the lateral and the medial harvesting techniques differed with respect to long-term donor-site morbidity. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone free fibula harvesting at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, between 1987 and 2008. The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach. The primary and secondary outcome variables were the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score and the result of the Short Form 36 Health Survey on quality of life, respectively. Other variables were age, gender, harvest length, operation time, and specific impairments and surgical complications. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS, version 14.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL); P < .05 was considered significant. Results The 42 patients had a mean age of 55.5 years. The mean follow-up period was 81 months (range, 7-174 months). In the medial group, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was 94.4 points and the total number of impairments was 34, as compared with 85.6 points and 46 impairments, respectively, in the lateral group. This tendency for less morbidity with the medial approach was only found in female patients. The Short Form 36 scores were not statistically different between the 2 surgical approaches. Conclusions The medial approach led to less functional impairment of the foot and ankle. Our results support the medial approach as a viable alternative, especially in women, but only in cases when a skin paddle is not necessary. Microvascular fibula harvesting for osseous reconstruction is a valuable aid in maxillofacial surgery. We assessed whether the lateral and the medial harvesting techniques differed with respect to long-term donor-site morbidity. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had undergone free fibula harvesting at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, between 1987 and 2008. The primary predictor variable was the surgical approach. The primary and secondary outcome variables were the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score and the result of the Short Form 36 Health Survey on quality of life, respectively. Other variables were age, gender, harvest length, operation time, and specific impairments and surgical complications. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS, version 14.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL); P < .05 was considered significant. The 42 patients had a mean age of 55.5 years. The mean follow-up period was 81 months (range, 7-174 months). In the medial group, the mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was 94.4 points and the total number of impairments was 34, as compared with 85.6 points and 46 impairments, respectively, in the lateral group. This tendency for less morbidity with the medial approach was only found in female patients. The Short Form 36 scores were not statistically different between the 2 surgical approaches. The medial approach led to less functional impairment of the foot and ankle. Our results support the medial approach as a viable alternative, especially in women, but only in cases when a skin paddle is not necessary." @default.
• W2045346095 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045346095 creator A5025090024 @default.
• W2045346095 creator A5046937146 @default.
• W2045346095 creator A5053859607 @default.
• W2045346095 creator A5059322781 @default.
• W2045346095 creator A5067434368 @default.
• W2045346095 creator A5067566848 @default.
• W2045346095 creator A5090175085 @default.
• W2045346095 date "2012-09-01" @default.
• W2045346095 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2045346095 title "Long-Term Donor-Site Morbidity After Microsurgical Fibular Graft: Is There a Difference Between the Medial Approach and the Lateral Approach?" @default.
• W2045346095 cites W1568919036 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W1970784464 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W1974989091 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W1979174773 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W1980845294 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W1984560777 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W1997990797 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2022880062 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2028672208 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2032888386 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2053386697 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2058777297 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2063439221 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2065428597 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2075721982 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2081533956 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2099369124 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2119548523 @default.
• W2045346095 cites W2158015169 @default.
• W2045346095 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.038" @default.
• W2045346095 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22209105" @default.
• W2045346095 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2045346095 type Work @default.
• W2045346095 sameAs 2045346095 @default.
• W2045346095 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2045346095 countsByYear W20453460952013 @default.
• W2045346095 countsByYear W20453460952016 @default.
• W2045346095 countsByYear W20453460952017 @default.
• W2045346095 countsByYear W20453460952018 @default.
• W2045346095 countsByYear W20453460952020 @default.
• W2045346095 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045346095 hasAuthorship W2045346095A5025090024 @default.
• W2045346095 hasAuthorship W2045346095A5046937146 @default.
• W2045346095 hasAuthorship W2045346095A5053859607 @default.
• W2045346095 hasAuthorship W2045346095A5059322781 @default.
• W2045346095 hasAuthorship W2045346095A5067434368 @default.
• W2045346095 hasAuthorship W2045346095A5067566848 @default.
• W2045346095 hasAuthorship W2045346095A5090175085 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C106207104 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C115076146 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C2777236700 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C2778640784 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C106207104 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C115076146 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C126322002 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C138885662 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C141071460 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C167135981 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C2777236700 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C2778640784 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C41895202 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C71924100 @default.
• W2045346095 hasConceptScore W2045346095C72563966 @default.
• W2045346095 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2045346095 hasLocation W20453460951 @default.
• W2045346095 hasLocation W20453460952 @default.
• W2045346095 hasOpenAccess W2045346095 @default.
• W2045346095 hasPrimaryLocation W20453460951 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2050206639 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2126120186 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2313968435 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2316921541 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2353880003 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2361160586 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2368407049 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2756109039 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W2898837406 @default.
• W2045346095 hasRelatedWork W4213161776 @default.
• W2045346095 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W2045346095 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045346095 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045346095 magId "2045346095" @default.
• W2045346095 workType "article" @default.