FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045385178> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045385178 endingPage "294" @default.
• W2045385178 startingPage "268" @default.
• W2045385178 abstract "SUMMARY Ten experiments were designed to explore the levels of processing framework for human memory research proposed by Craik and Lockhart (1972). The basic notions are that the episodic memory trace may be thought of as a rather automatic by-product of operations carried out by the cognitive system and that the durability of the trace is a positive function of of processing, where depth refers to greater degrees of semantic involvement. Subjects were induced to process words to different depths by answering various questions about the words. For example, shallow encodings were achieved by asking questions about typescript; intermediate levels of encoding were accomplished by asking questions about rhymes; deep levels were induced by asking whether the word would fit into a given category or sentence frame. After the encoding phase was completed, subjects were unexpectedly given a recall or recognition test for the words. In general, deeper encodings took longer to accomplish and were associated with higher levels of performance on the subsequent memory test. Also, questions leading to positive responses were associated with higher retention levels than questions leading to negative responses, at least at deeper levels of encoding. Further experiments examined this pattern of effects in greater analytic detail. It was established that the original results did not simply reflect differential encoding times; an experiment was designed in which a complex but shallow task took longer to carry out but yielded lower levels of recognition than an easy, deeper task. Other studies explored reasons for the superior retention of words associated with positive responses on the initial task. Negative responses were remembered as well as positive responses when the questions led to an equally elaborate encoding in the two cases. The idea that elaboration or of encoding provides a better description of the results was given a further boost by the finding of the typical pattern of results under intentional learning conditions, and where each word was exposed for 6 sec in the initial phase. While spread and elaboration may indeed be better descriptive terms for the present findings, retention depends critically on the qualitative nature of the encoding operations performed; a minimal semantic analysis is more beneficial than an extensive structural analysis. Finally, Schulman's (1974) principle of congruity appears necessary for a complete description of the effects obtained. Memory performance is enhanced to the extent that the context, or encoding question, forms an integrated unit with the word presented. A congruous encoding yields superior memory performance because a more elaborate trace is laid down and because in such cases the structure of semantic memory can be utilized more effectively to facilitate retrieval. The article concludes with a discussion of the broader implications of these data and ideas for the study of human learning and memory," @default.
• W2045385178 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045385178 creator A5084881685 @default.
• W2045385178 creator A5091209885 @default.
• W2045385178 date "1975-09-01" @default.
• W2045385178 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2045385178 title "Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory." @default.
• W2045385178 cites W1550368598 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W1974267310 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W1974660511 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W1975633640 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W1976217340 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W1990451873 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W1995765875 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W1997224622 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2001022851 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2004874976 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2007297688 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2009250385 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2021625970 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2024736643 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2025668003 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2026636579 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2062090222 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2073797178 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2092653075 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2099733010 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2114550657 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2129091132 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2135729325 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2460260222 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W29027970 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W3041214984 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W3189797024 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W567157350 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W600444075 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W613869070 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W658231348 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W75573543 @default.
• W2045385178 cites W2188589110 @default.
• W2045385178 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.268" @default.
• W2045385178 hasPublicationYear "1975" @default.
• W2045385178 type Work @default.
• W2045385178 sameAs 2045385178 @default.
• W2045385178 citedByCount "3263" @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782012 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782013 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782014 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782015 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782016 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782017 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782018 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782019 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782020 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782021 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782022 @default.
• W2045385178 countsByYear W20453851782023 @default.
• W2045385178 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045385178 hasAuthorship W2045385178A5084881685 @default.
• W2045385178 hasAuthorship W2045385178A5091209885 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConcept C88576662 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConceptScore W2045385178C15744967 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConceptScore W2045385178C169760540 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConceptScore W2045385178C169900460 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConceptScore W2045385178C180747234 @default.
• W2045385178 hasConceptScore W2045385178C88576662 @default.
• W2045385178 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2045385178 hasLocation W20453851781 @default.
• W2045385178 hasOpenAccess W2045385178 @default.
• W2045385178 hasPrimaryLocation W20453851781 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W1989444360 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W1997822640 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W2085642841 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W2091034979 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W2125072457 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W2977458825 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W2996163655 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W3091856255 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W4254849301 @default.
• W2045385178 hasRelatedWork W754554190 @default.
• W2045385178 hasVolume "104" @default.
• W2045385178 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045385178 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045385178 magId "2045385178" @default.
• W2045385178 workType "article" @default.