FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045492833> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045492833 abstract "HomeCirculation ResearchVol. 104, No. 1Response to the Letter by Rose et al Free AccessLetterPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessLetterPDF/EPUBResponse to the Letter by Rose et al Daniël A. Pijnappels, Martin J. Schalij and Douwe E. Atsma Daniël A. PijnappelsDaniël A. Pijnappels Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, E-mail Search for more papers by this author , Martin J. SchalijMartin J. Schalij Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, E-mail Search for more papers by this author and Douwe E. AtsmaDouwe E. Atsma Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, E-mail Search for more papers by this author Originally published2 Jan 2009https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.190132Circulation Research. 2009;104:e8We would like to reply to the letter by Drs Rose, Keating, and Backx,1 in which they gave their response to our recent publication in Circulation Research.2 In this study, we introduced alignment of transplanted stem cells as a novel determinant of functional integration of these cells with native cardiac tissue. In this study, we used neonatal rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which differentiated into functional cardiac cells after coculture with neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (CMCs). In their letter, Rose et al raise the important question of whether MSCs can differentiate into functional CMCs.1 However, we demonstrated that neonatal rat MSCs do differentiate into functional CMCs. Although we were one of the first to address the issue of cell alignment and stem cell transplantation, cardiomyogenic differentiation of MSCs derived from a premature or young organism has been shown previously by other groups.3,4 On the other hand, a number of groups, including ourselves, have shown the inability of adult MSCs to fully differentiate into CMCs.5,6 Rose et al suggest that the de novo CMCs observed in our study were not derived from MSCs but from contaminating hematopoietic stem cells. The neonatal rat MSCs used in our study contained a small fraction of CD45-positive cells, suggesting a hematopoietic origin; however, only 1.5% of the MSCs were positive for CD34, which is considered to be a key surface marker of hematopoietic stem cells. Moreover, in a study by Nishiyama et al, more than 40% of neonatal human MSCs, which were CD45-negative, differentiated into CMCs after coculture with fetal CMCs.3 However, we do agree that the issue of MSC differentiation into functional CMCs is still surrounded by uncertainties and therefore needs further study. We feel a number of aspects add to today’s confusion about stem cells and their cardiomyogenic differentiation in general. First of all, the scientific community has not yet reached consensus about a definition of a stem or progenitor cell–derived cardiomyocyte. As a result, claims are made with regard to cardiomyogenic differentiation on the basis of varied criteria and interpretations. Secondly, the way we define stem or progenitor cells affects our interpretation of scientific data, but how solid and refined are the definitions of stem or progenitor cells? In research laboratories, different methods are used to induce cardiomyogenic differentiation in stem cells, including coculture with CMCs. However, none of these methods seems to result in 100% functional differentiation. This could be attributable to the fact that the stimuli provided in a specific setting are insufficient to induce differentiation in all stem cells that are capable of cardiomyogenic differentiation. However, another possible explanation, which we favor, might be the existence of subsets of stem cells that exhibit cardiomyogenic potential, existing within a particular stem cell population (for example MSCs).7 This would imply that one cannot make a conclusion about the cardiomyogenic differentiation of MSCs as a group. To address this issue, we need more evidence for the existence of cardiomyogenic subpopulations of stem cells within larger niches. Thirdly, the limited knowledge about the mechanisms by which cardiomyogenic differentiation occurs makes it difficult to define standardized in vitro differentiation protocols. This hinders the distinction between a biological and a technical cause for the inability to induce cardiomyogenic differentiation in the candidate cells.We acknowledge the important question that Rose et al address in their letter,1 and we encourage further discussion in the scientific community to accelerate and refine the ongoing progress in the field of stem cell–related cardiovascular research.Taken together, we feel that additional and more detailed research is needed to fully comprehend the mechanisms by which stem cell biology might offer us novel therapeutic options to treat the damaged heart but also to show us the qualms and quests we need to cope with, not only today but also in the future.Sources of FundingSupported by funds from Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.DisclosuresNone.1 Rose RA, Keating A, Backx PH. Do mesenchymal stromal cells transdifferentiate into functional cardiomyocytes? Circ Res. 2008; 103: 120.LinkGoogle Scholar2 Pijnappels DA, Schalij MJ, Ramkisoensing AA, van Tuyn J, de Vries AA, van der Laarse A, Ypey DL, Atsma DE. Forced alignment of mesenchymal stem cells undergoing cardiomyogenic differentiation affects functional integration with cardiomyocyte cultures. Circ Res. 2008; 103: 167–176.LinkGoogle Scholar3 Nishiyama N, Miyoshi S, Hida N, Uyama T, Okamoto K, Ikegami Y, Miyado K, Segawa K, Terai M, Sakamoto M, Ogawa S, Umezawa A. The significant cardiomyogenic potential of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Stem cells. 2007; 25: 2017–2024.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Jiang S, Kh Haider H, Ahmed RP, Idris NM, Salim A, Ashraf M. Transcriptional profiling of young and old mesenchymal stem cells in response to oxygen deprivation and reparability of the infarcted myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008; 44: 582–596.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Rose RA, Jiang H, Wang X, Helke S, Tsoporis JN, Gong N, Keating SCJ, Parker TG, Backx PH, Keating A. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells express cardiac-specific markers, retain the stromal phenotype and do not become functional cardiomyocytes in vitro. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 2884–2892.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Pijnappels DA, Schalij MJ, van Tuyn J, Ypey DL, de Vries AA, van der Wall EE, van der Laarse A, Atsma DE. Progressive increase in conduction velocity across human mesenchymal stem cells is mediated by enhanced electrical coupling. Cardiovasc Res. 2006; 72: 282–291.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7 Bianco P, Gehron Robey P, Simmons PJ. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2008; 2: 313–319.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Ramkisoensing A, De Vries A, Schalij M, Atsma D and Pijnappels D (2012) Brief Report: Misinterpretation of Coculture Differentiation Experiments by Unintended Labeling of Cardiomyocytes Through Secondary Transduction: Delusions and Solutions, STEM CELLS, 10.1002/stem.1236, 30:12, (2830-2834), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2012. Ramkisoensing A, Pijnappels D, Swildens J, Goumans M, Fibbe W, Schalij M, de Vries A and Atsma D (2012) Gap Junctional Coupling with Cardiomyocytes is Necessary but Not Sufficient for Cardiomyogenic Differentiation of Cocultured Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Stem Cells, 10.1002/stem.1086, 30:6, (1236-1245), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012. January 2, 2009Vol 104, Issue 1 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.190132PMID: 19118278 Originally publishedJanuary 2, 2009 PDF download Advertisement" @default.
• W2045492833 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045492833 creator A5041678517 @default.
• W2045492833 creator A5045837453 @default.
• W2045492833 creator A5067431731 @default.
• W2045492833 date "2009-01-02" @default.
• W2045492833 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2045492833 title "Response to the Letter by Rose et al" @default.
• W2045492833 cites W2034789248 @default.
• W2045492833 cites W2066305008 @default.
• W2045492833 cites W2082900428 @default.
• W2045492833 cites W2093191361 @default.
• W2045492833 cites W2098562039 @default.
• W2045492833 cites W2142804846 @default.
• W2045492833 cites W2150210372 @default.
• W2045492833 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.108.190132" @default.
• W2045492833 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19118278" @default.
• W2045492833 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2045492833 type Work @default.
• W2045492833 sameAs 2045492833 @default.
• W2045492833 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2045492833 countsByYear W20454928332012 @default.
• W2045492833 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045492833 hasAuthorship W2045492833A5041678517 @default.
• W2045492833 hasAuthorship W2045492833A5045837453 @default.
• W2045492833 hasAuthorship W2045492833A5067431731 @default.
• W2045492833 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
• W2045492833 hasConcept C2778335665 @default.
• W2045492833 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2045492833 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2045492833 hasConceptScore W2045492833C144027150 @default.
• W2045492833 hasConceptScore W2045492833C2778335665 @default.
• W2045492833 hasConceptScore W2045492833C71924100 @default.
• W2045492833 hasConceptScore W2045492833C86803240 @default.
• W2045492833 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2045492833 hasLocation W20454928331 @default.
• W2045492833 hasLocation W20454928332 @default.
• W2045492833 hasOpenAccess W2045492833 @default.
• W2045492833 hasPrimaryLocation W20454928331 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W1820089824 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W2314041892 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W2803156419 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W4236806315 @default.
• W2045492833 hasRelatedWork W4252203162 @default.
• W2045492833 hasVolume "104" @default.
• W2045492833 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045492833 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045492833 magId "2045492833" @default.
• W2045492833 workType "article" @default.