Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045534443> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2045534443 endingPage "216" @default.
- W2045534443 startingPage "210" @default.
- W2045534443 abstract "Homologous genes are classified into orthologs and paralogs, depending on whether they arose by speciation or duplication. It is widely assumed that orthologs share similar functions, whereas paralogs are expected to diverge more from each other. But does this assumption hold up on further examination? We present evidence that orthologs and paralogs are not so different in either their evolutionary rates or their mechanisms of divergence. We emphasize the importance of appropriately designed studies to test models of gene evolution between orthologs and between paralogs. Thus, functional change between orthologs might be as common as between paralogs, and future studies should be designed to test the impact of duplication against this alternative model. Homologous genes are classified into orthologs and paralogs, depending on whether they arose by speciation or duplication. It is widely assumed that orthologs share similar functions, whereas paralogs are expected to diverge more from each other. But does this assumption hold up on further examination? We present evidence that orthologs and paralogs are not so different in either their evolutionary rates or their mechanisms of divergence. We emphasize the importance of appropriately designed studies to test models of gene evolution between orthologs and between paralogs. Thus, functional change between orthologs might be as common as between paralogs, and future studies should be designed to test the impact of duplication against this alternative model. the retention of copies of genes after duplication is not random, relative to gene function or evolutionary rate. This bias can be a confounding factor in large scale analyses of paralogs: the function of duplicate genes in a genome results both from the bias in retention and from evolution after duplication. genes descending from a common ancestor. paralogs resulting from a duplication after a speciation event of reference. selection that decreases the chance of fixation of a mutation because it is detrimental; it results in a decrease in the rate of evolution of selected mutations. the process in which one paralog gains a new function, which is selectively advantageous. orthologs which are present in a single copy in each genome of interest. homologs which have diverged since a speciation event. paralogs resulting from a duplication before a speciation event of reference. homologs which have diverged since a duplication event. selection that increases the chance of fixation of a mutation because it is beneficial; it results in an increase in the rate of evolution of selected mutations. the process in which paralogs partition the ancestral function, so that each performs only part of this function. Subfunctionalization can happen by degenerating reciprocal mutations (DDC model), or by positive selection for specialization (escape from adaptive conflict)." @default.
- W2045534443 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2045534443 creator A5008456362 @default.
- W2045534443 creator A5054250703 @default.
- W2045534443 date "2009-05-01" @default.
- W2045534443 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2045534443 title "How confident can we be that orthologs are similar, but paralogs differ?" @default.
- W2045534443 cites W1799452017 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W1849631302 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W1969250533 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W1992140809 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W1997497517 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W1999960938 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2003644562 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2007978853 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2008646367 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2009234149 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2010562878 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2011465945 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2012840807 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2027881855 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2028190503 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2029353325 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2052743506 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2057152187 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2057387739 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2062255150 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2071378905 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2072718843 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2081458613 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2087456735 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2089278448 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2092414509 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2097128462 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2099560716 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2099762535 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2102881062 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2103111028 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2112250822 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2112768399 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2112955970 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2114129091 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2116609981 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2116829288 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2118077323 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2119737011 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2120030937 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2123653059 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2124253664 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2125228440 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2130353827 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2130968561 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2133514781 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2135160221 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2138619057 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2142045367 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2145100181 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2147710217 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2153250803 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2154770881 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2155651473 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2156340505 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2156521200 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2160070700 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2166085889 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2168570965 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2168847435 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W2171865578 @default.
- W2045534443 cites W4210430020 @default.
- W2045534443 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.004" @default.
- W2045534443 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19368988" @default.
- W2045534443 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2045534443 type Work @default.
- W2045534443 sameAs 2045534443 @default.
- W2045534443 citedByCount "143" @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432012 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432013 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432014 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432015 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432016 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432017 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432018 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432019 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432020 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432021 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432022 @default.
- W2045534443 countsByYear W20455344432023 @default.
- W2045534443 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2045534443 hasAuthorship W2045534443A5008456362 @default.
- W2045534443 hasAuthorship W2045534443A5054250703 @default.
- W2045534443 hasBestOaLocation W20455344432 @default.
- W2045534443 hasConcept C103077935 @default.
- W2045534443 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
- W2045534443 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2045534443 hasConcept C14036430 @default.
- W2045534443 hasConcept C141231307 @default.
- W2045534443 hasConcept C166393388 @default.
- W2045534443 hasConcept C207390915 @default.