FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045573764> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045573764 endingPage "136" @default.
• W2045573764 startingPage "134" @default.
• W2045573764 abstract "The theme of this study is innovative, and its aim is ar. The result of the research is valuable for medical ofessionals, especially for professionals engaged in pain anagements. The paper prompted the Acute Pain Nurses communicate with their patients more. As a result, they n know patients’ real pain feeling instead of overtimate and overtreatment. However, I think there are me drawbacks in the paper. Now, I show them for study d discussion. Firstly, the results showed in abstract of the article: ost patients considered NRS 4–6 as ‘‘bearable’’ pain. hile the Acute Pain Nurses considered NRS of 5 and gher not to be bearable. But in the conclusion, the author rote: A risk of overtreatment might arise when health re providers rigidly follow guidelines that prescribe ong analgesics for pain scores above 3 or 4. I wonder hy health care providers don’t prescribe strong analges for pain scores above 5 instead of 3 or 4 since the Acute in Nurses considered NRS of 5 and higher not to be arable. I think the author should interpret it clearly. Secondly, I don’t know why the author only give the percentage of the patients scored an NRS > 4, while did not calculate the percentage of the patients scored an NRS > 3 in Fig. 1. I think he/she should figure out both data because he/she presented the NRS threshold for prescribing analgesics varies: some guideline chose an NRS cut-off > 4, 4, while some chose an NRS cut-off > 3 as the criterion for administering analgesics in the introduction on page66. Further more, the latter is a new one. Similarly, in the results (3.1), when the author presented the distribution of the NRS scores of actual pain at rest 24 h after the operation, he/she should also describe the percentage of the patients scored for NRS > 3, except for the percentage scored with NRS > 4. Thirdly, the author said in the study design of Methods: The current study was part of a large cluster-randomized study. But I think the study used the convenience R T I C L E I N F O" @default.
• W2045573764 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045573764 creator A5028332296 @default.
• W2045573764 creator A5048480792 @default.
• W2045573764 creator A5052756116 @default.
• W2045573764 creator A5088515626 @default.
• W2045573764 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2045573764 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2045573764 title "Postoperative pain assessment based on numeric ratings is not the same for patients and professionals: Commentary on van Dijk et al. (2012)" @default.
• W2045573764 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.05.005" @default.
• W2045573764 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22810013" @default.
• W2045573764 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2045573764 type Work @default.
• W2045573764 sameAs 2045573764 @default.
• W2045573764 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2045573764 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045573764 hasAuthorship W2045573764A5028332296 @default.
• W2045573764 hasAuthorship W2045573764A5048480792 @default.
• W2045573764 hasAuthorship W2045573764A5052756116 @default.
• W2045573764 hasAuthorship W2045573764A5088515626 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C2778282284 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C2983098980 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C3019806175 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C15744967 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C159110408 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C160735492 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C17744445 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C1862650 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C199539241 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C2778282284 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C2779473830 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C2983098980 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C3019806175 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C70410870 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C71924100 @default.
• W2045573764 hasConceptScore W2045573764C75630572 @default.
• W2045573764 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2045573764 hasLocation W20455737641 @default.
• W2045573764 hasLocation W20455737642 @default.
• W2045573764 hasOpenAccess W2045573764 @default.
• W2045573764 hasPrimaryLocation W20455737641 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W130910681 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W1972694300 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W2019281819 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W2060617220 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W2075266187 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W2769436879 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W2994676408 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W3124724260 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W3215972514 @default.
• W2045573764 hasRelatedWork W4231723610 @default.
• W2045573764 hasVolume "50" @default.
• W2045573764 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045573764 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045573764 magId "2045573764" @default.
• W2045573764 workType "article" @default.