FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045576479> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045576479 endingPage "475" @default.
• W2045576479 startingPage "470" @default.
• W2045576479 abstract "Background: The ability of medical students to recognize heart murmurs is poor (20%), and does not improve with subsequent years of training. A teaching method to improve this skill would be useful. Study objectives: To determine whether intensive repetition of four basic cardiac murmurs improves auscultatory proficiency in medical students. Design: Controlled intervention study. Subjects: Fifty-one second-year medical students in an east coast medical school. Interventions: Subjects were classified into three groups: (1) a monitored group, who listened to 500 repetitions of each murmur in a monitored setting, (2) an unmonitored group, who listened to 500 repetitions of each murmur in an unmonitored setting, and (3) a control group. All three groups were tested using a pretest and posttest methodology. Measurements and results: The 20 subjects in the monitored group improved from 13.5 ± 9.8 to 85 ± 17.6% following the intervention (mean ± SD). Similarly, 21 students in the unmonitored group improved from 20.9 ± 10.9 to 86.1 ± 15.6%. Ten control students showed no significant improvement (24 ± 21.7 to 32 ± 22.5%). The differences between the two intervention groups and the control subjects was significant at p < 0.001 by analysis of variance. Conclusion: Five hundred repetitions of four basic cardiac murmurs significantly improved auscultatory proficiency in recognizing basic cardiac murmurs by medical students. These results suggest that cardiac auscultation is, in part, a technical skill. The ability of medical students to recognize heart murmurs is poor (20%), and does not improve with subsequent years of training. A teaching method to improve this skill would be useful. To determine whether intensive repetition of four basic cardiac murmurs improves auscultatory proficiency in medical students. Controlled intervention study. Fifty-one second-year medical students in an east coast medical school. Subjects were classified into three groups: (1) a monitored group, who listened to 500 repetitions of each murmur in a monitored setting, (2) an unmonitored group, who listened to 500 repetitions of each murmur in an unmonitored setting, and (3) a control group. All three groups were tested using a pretest and posttest methodology. The 20 subjects in the monitored group improved from 13.5 ± 9.8 to 85 ± 17.6% following the intervention (mean ± SD). Similarly, 21 students in the unmonitored group improved from 20.9 ± 10.9 to 86.1 ± 15.6%. Ten control students showed no significant improvement (24 ± 21.7 to 32 ± 22.5%). The differences between the two intervention groups and the control subjects was significant at p < 0.001 by analysis of variance. Five hundred repetitions of four basic cardiac murmurs significantly improved auscultatory proficiency in recognizing basic cardiac murmurs by medical students. These results suggest that cardiac auscultation is, in part, a technical skill." @default.
• W2045576479 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045576479 creator A5044368082 @default.
• W2045576479 creator A5044795107 @default.
• W2045576479 creator A5049918533 @default.
• W2045576479 creator A5062229327 @default.
• W2045576479 creator A5068301177 @default.
• W2045576479 date "2004-08-01" @default.
• W2045576479 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2045576479 title "Mastering Cardiac Murmurs" @default.
• W2045576479 cites W1783460453 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W1974617363 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W2005546351 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W2005836130 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W2026561239 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W2029712981 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W2037905623 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W2049198201 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W2068002666 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W2112134436 @default.
• W2045576479 cites W4294236058 @default.
• W2045576479 doi "https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.2.470" @default.
• W2045576479 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15302733" @default.
• W2045576479 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2045576479 type Work @default.
• W2045576479 sameAs 2045576479 @default.
• W2045576479 citedByCount "74" @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792012 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792013 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792014 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792015 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792016 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792017 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792018 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792019 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792020 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792021 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792022 @default.
• W2045576479 countsByYear W20455764792023 @default.
• W2045576479 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045576479 hasAuthorship W2045576479A5044368082 @default.
• W2045576479 hasAuthorship W2045576479A5044795107 @default.
• W2045576479 hasAuthorship W2045576479A5049918533 @default.
• W2045576479 hasAuthorship W2045576479A5062229327 @default.
• W2045576479 hasAuthorship W2045576479A5068301177 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConcept C2777324038 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConcept C2779435589 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConcept C2780379053 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConceptScore W2045576479C159110408 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConceptScore W2045576479C164705383 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConceptScore W2045576479C1862650 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConceptScore W2045576479C2777324038 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConceptScore W2045576479C2779435589 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConceptScore W2045576479C2780379053 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConceptScore W2045576479C2780665704 @default.
• W2045576479 hasConceptScore W2045576479C71924100 @default.
• W2045576479 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2045576479 hasLocation W20455764791 @default.
• W2045576479 hasLocation W20455764792 @default.
• W2045576479 hasOpenAccess W2045576479 @default.
• W2045576479 hasPrimaryLocation W20455764791 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W1601748943 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W1982614964 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W2013970413 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W2062210329 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W2462513779 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W2894363876 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W2903217712 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W2904211081 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W3191193899 @default.
• W2045576479 hasRelatedWork W310243274 @default.
• W2045576479 hasVolume "126" @default.
• W2045576479 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045576479 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045576479 magId "2045576479" @default.
• W2045576479 workType "article" @default.