FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045589940> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045589940 endingPage "061701" @default.
• W2045589940 startingPage "061701" @default.
• W2045589940 abstract "Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf width on treatment adaptation and delivery accuracy for concurrent treatment of the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods: Seventy-five kilovoltage cone beam CTs (KV-CBCT) from six patients were included for this retrospective study. For each patient, three different IMRT plans were created based on a planning CT using three different MLC leaf widths of 2.5, 5, and 10 mm, respectively. For each CBCT, the prostate displacement was determined by a dual image registration. Adaptive plans were created by shifting selected MLC leaf pairs to compensate for daily prostate movements. To evaluate the impact of MLC leaf width on the adaptive plan for each daily CBCT, three MLC shifted plans were created using three different leaf widths of MLCs (a total of 225 adaptive treatment plans). Selective dosimetric endpoints for the tumor volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated for these adaptive plans. Using the planning CT from a selected patient, MLC shifted plans for three hypothetical longitudinal shifts of 2, 4, and 8 mm were delivered on the three linear accelerators to test the deliverability of the shifted plans and to compare the dose accuracy of the shifted plans with the original IMRT plans. Results: Adaptive plans from 2.5 and 5 mm MLCs had inadequate dose coverage to the prostate (D99 < 97%, orDmean < 99% of the planned dose) in 6%–8% of the fractions, while adaptive plans from 10 mm MLC led to inadequate dose coverage to the prostate in 25.3% of the fractions. The average V56Gy of the prostate over the six patients was improved by 6.4% (1.6%–32.7%) and 5.8% (1.5%–35.7%) with adaptive plans from 2.5 and 5 mm MLCs, respectively, when compared with adaptive plans from 10 mm MLC. Pelvic lymph nodes were well covered for all MLC adaptive plans, as small differences were observed for D99, Dmean, and V50.4Gy. Similar OAR sparing could be achieved for the bladder and rectum with all three MLCs for treatment adaptation. The MLC shifted plans can be accurately delivered on all three linear accelerators with accuracy similar to their original IMRT plans, where gamma (3%/3 mm) passing rates were 99.6%, 93.0%, and 92.1% for 2.5, 5, and 10 mm MLCs, respectively. The percentages of pixels with dose differences between the measurement and calculation being less than 3% of the maximum dose were 85.9%, 82.5%, and 70.5% for the original IMRT plans from the three MLCs, respectively. Conclusions: Dosimetric advantages associated with smaller MLC leaves were observed in terms of the coverage to the prostate, when the treatment was adapted to account for daily prostate movement for concurrent irradiation of the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. The benefit of switching the MLC from 10 to 5 mm was significant (p ≪ 0.01); however, switching the MLC from 5 to 2.5 mm would not gain significant (p = 0.15) improvement. IMRT plans with smaller MLC leaf widths achieved more accurate dose delivery." @default.
• W2045589940 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045589940 creator A5020769528 @default.
• W2045589940 creator A5044659093 @default.
• W2045589940 creator A5046981277 @default.
• W2045589940 creator A5051586183 @default.
• W2045589940 date "2013-05-06" @default.
• W2045589940 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2045589940 title "Effect of MLC leaf width on treatment adaptation and accuracy for concurrent irradiation of prostate and pelvic lymph nodes" @default.
• W2045589940 cites W1765388461 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W1971654679 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W1976125960 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W1995822876 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W2008355295 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W2014394528 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W2019714779 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W2049225956 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W2065001026 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W2109490458 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W2117058143 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W2148023536 @default.
• W2045589940 cites W4229583604 @default.
• W2045589940 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4803499" @default.
• W2045589940 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23718580" @default.
• W2045589940 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2045589940 type Work @default.
• W2045589940 sameAs 2045589940 @default.
• W2045589940 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2045589940 countsByYear W20455899402015 @default.
• W2045589940 countsByYear W20455899402016 @default.
• W2045589940 countsByYear W20455899402017 @default.
• W2045589940 countsByYear W20455899402018 @default.
• W2045589940 countsByYear W20455899402019 @default.
• W2045589940 countsByYear W20455899402020 @default.
• W2045589940 countsByYear W20455899402022 @default.
• W2045589940 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045589940 hasAuthorship W2045589940A5020769528 @default.
• W2045589940 hasAuthorship W2045589940A5044659093 @default.
• W2045589940 hasAuthorship W2045589940A5046981277 @default.
• W2045589940 hasAuthorship W2045589940A5051586183 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C161471255 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C44280652 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C48925448 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConcept C96834759 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C121332964 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C121608353 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C126322002 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C126838900 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C161471255 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C201645570 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C2776235491 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C2989005 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C44280652 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C48925448 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C509974204 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C62520636 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C71924100 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C75088862 @default.
• W2045589940 hasConceptScore W2045589940C96834759 @default.
• W2045589940 hasIssue "6Part1" @default.
• W2045589940 hasLocation W20455899401 @default.
• W2045589940 hasLocation W20455899402 @default.
• W2045589940 hasOpenAccess W2045589940 @default.
• W2045589940 hasPrimaryLocation W20455899401 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W1970127958 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W1977472174 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W1995822876 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W2034142138 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W2035168770 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W2144622085 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W2162558591 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W2186742268 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W2348084475 @default.
• W2045589940 hasRelatedWork W4231853619 @default.
• W2045589940 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W2045589940 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045589940 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045589940 magId "2045589940" @default.
• W2045589940 workType "article" @default.