FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045722123> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045722123 endingPage "342" @default.
• W2045722123 startingPage "342" @default.
• W2045722123 abstract "We assessed the potential for determining current annual growth (CAG) of browse with visual estimates of shrub canopy volume, combined with double sampling for clip-and-weigh measurements of biomass. This sampling approach permits direct assessment of CAG per unit area without estimates of shrub density. Ratio estimates based on double sampling provided suitable CAG estimates, assuming 80% confidence, for total production when browse species were combined. This double-sampling approach for individual browse species is likely possible only when shrub taxa are abundant or uniformly distributed, or when the sample site has been stratified according to the distribution of CAG values of specific browse species. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 54(2):342-348 Inventory programs to estimate browse production available for use by wildlife and livestock pose complex problems because of highly variable plant physiognomy, life history, and spatial distribution of browse species (Telfer 1981). Sampling methods range from visual estimates to detailed clip-and-weigh determinations of CAG or standing crop; each method has inherent strengths and weaknesses (Rutherford 1979, Pitt and Schwab 1988). Visual estimates offer an inexpensive and relatively easy method to assess shrub CAG, but are hindered by observer and statistical bias (Pechanec and Pickford 1937, Jolly 1954) and often fail to provide management agencies with verifiable levels of statistical confidence and precision (Pitt and Schwab 1988). Shrub CAG may be determined directly by clipping within randomly or systematically selected plots. Plant material is then oven-dried to obtain biomass, CAG, or availability per unit area (Mannetje 1978). Clip-and-weigh techniques are typically expensive and tedious and are more appropriate for intensive research than for extensive browse inventory programs (Pitt and Schwab 1988). Regression and ratio estimates reduce the arduous, expensive aspects of direct measurements by predicting CAG from more easily measured shrub components. Biomass of leaves, twigs, or entire shrubs have been associated with stems per unit area (Wolff 1978); twig diameter (Telfer 1969, Provenza and Urness 1981); stem diameter (Felker et al. 1982); shrub height (Ohmann et al. 1976); crown volume (Guy 1981); crown diameter, depth, and density (Dean et al. 1981); crown width (Rittenhouse and Sneva 1977); crown area, or cover (Anderson and Kothmann 1982); height and stem diameter products (Stone and Crawford 1981); twig lengths (Schuster 1965); twigs per plant (Peek 1970); and shrub ring widths (Davis et al. 1972). Despite the abundant literature describing methodology, extensive shrub inventories remain prohibitively costly, perhaps because most regression techniques provide CAG per stem or shrub. Such CAG estimates must be combined with stem or shrub density estimates to yield CAG per unit area. Appropriate techniques for estimating density vary according to physiognomy and spatial distribution of shrub species. Many density estimates are laborious or contain statistical bias (Pitt and Schwab 1988). The most appropriate shrub inventory method, therefore, is a regression or ratio estimate of CAG predicted from shrub components measured on a unit-area basis, such as canopy volume. These predictions estimate CAG per unit area directly, without density estimates. Shrub canopy volume also correlates well with biomass and CAG and has generally lower coefficients of variation compared to other predictor variables (Bryant and Kothmann 1979, Murray and Jacobson 1982). Direct predictions of CAG per unit area are feasible for browse inventory when double-sampling programs are used (Cochran 1977:327, Nichols 1979). We assessed a double-sampling approach for predicting shrub CAG using visual volume estimates recorded during first-phase sampling and actual CAG clipped and weighed during second-phase sampling. Feasibility for browse inventory programs was also evaluated relative to field sampling costs and statistical precision. M. L. Beets, C. A. Easthope, R. C. Gordon," @default.
• W2045722123 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045722123 creator A5035847864 @default.
• W2045722123 creator A5052755403 @default.
• W2045722123 date "1990-04-01" @default.
• W2045722123 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2045722123 title "Assessment of a Double-Sampling Technique for Estimating Browse Biomass" @default.
• W2045722123 cites W1982172270 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W1986961368 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2075025035 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2088200683 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2105737691 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2294128053 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2325798163 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2327719427 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2330879993 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2507390793 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2507398243 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2508207650 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2518393812 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2610067157 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2610108421 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2625795888 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W2739521969 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W286117848 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W3032904726 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W81453686 @default.
• W2045722123 cites W90618920 @default.
• W2045722123 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3809052" @default.
• W2045722123 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
• W2045722123 type Work @default.
• W2045722123 sameAs 2045722123 @default.
• W2045722123 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2045722123 countsByYear W20457221232013 @default.
• W2045722123 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045722123 hasAuthorship W2045722123A5035847864 @default.
• W2045722123 hasAuthorship W2045722123A5052755403 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C115540264 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C2781050692 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C77077793 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C105795698 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C106131492 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C115540264 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C140779682 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C18903297 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C205649164 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C2781050692 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C31972630 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C33923547 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C39432304 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C41008148 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C6557445 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C77077793 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C86803240 @default.
• W2045722123 hasConceptScore W2045722123C97137747 @default.
• W2045722123 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2045722123 hasLocation W20457221231 @default.
• W2045722123 hasOpenAccess W2045722123 @default.
• W2045722123 hasPrimaryLocation W20457221231 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W1935653734 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W1994260122 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W2009947368 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W2048770636 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W2058593563 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W2075865591 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W2107867220 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W2181455814 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W2316565647 @default.
• W2045722123 hasRelatedWork W2323231699 @default.
• W2045722123 hasVolume "54" @default.
• W2045722123 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045722123 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045722123 magId "2045722123" @default.
• W2045722123 workType "article" @default.