FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045799891> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045799891 endingPage "19" @default.
• W2045799891 startingPage "10" @default.
• W2045799891 abstract "THIS ESSAY IS CONCERNED WITH THE NOTIONS of form and content, as well as some ideological issues related to critico-literary canonisation. It engages with children's literature as textual practices, but also, in parallel, with (children's) (literary) criticism as an intellectual enterprise. Throughout what follows, I will consider some epistemological questions, and will place my thoughts within the affirmative why? and why not? of what I believe to be a counter-hegemonic argument, an argument interested in open-mindedness and unconditionality, or, in other words, (aca- demic) anarchism/freedom.1 Children's literature, as common beliefs often have it, is something one can buy in book-shops, or through websites such as Amazon, or pick up from library bookshelves. Approached this way, children's literature is a material object. And this is how many people—inside and outside academia—under- stand the phrase 'children's literature'. Nevertheless, children's literature, as an academic discipline, and given the way it has evolved over the past twenty years or so, and more particularly in quite a number of recent publications, is best described as sitting at the cross-roads of different definitional discourses: it is an ambivalent subject which very often leads to rather contentious debates as regards its very nature. In this essay, I would like to address some of the most influential arguments that have emerged since children's literature found its place within the academic arena. Therefore, I intend to read through the works of such critics as Jacqueline Rose and Karin Lesnik-Oberstein, who, using psychoanalysis, have focused on the fictionalisation of childhood in books written for and about children, and take their arguments through Jack Zipes and David Rudd who, reflecting on the genealogy of children's litera- ture have argued that through its institutionalisation it has acquired a specific and ideologically-restricted (or ideologically-restricting) definition, and Peter Hunt who approaches children's literature the most radically by introducing the idea of a childist criticism of children's literature. As will soon become clear, this essay focuses primarily on issues of aca- demic definitions, which all are concerned with what the phrase 'children's literature' is thought to mean and imply, or means and implies, or could mean and imply. My purpose is to concentrate on the fact that children's literature," @default.
• W2045799891 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045799891 creator A5021331819 @default.
• W2045799891 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2045799891 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2045799891 title "Children's Literature, Issues of Definition: The Why? and Why Not? of Criticism" @default.
• W2045799891 cites W1226341319 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W1546487199 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W1576318776 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W1827112926 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W1980073834 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W2028107398 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W2059327706 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W2065703267 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W2484494005 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W3112958363 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W3121270388 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W432498252 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W618849827 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W620278837 @default.
• W2045799891 cites W1524325770 @default.
• W2045799891 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/esp.2010.0278" @default.
• W2045799891 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2045799891 type Work @default.
• W2045799891 sameAs 2045799891 @default.
• W2045799891 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2045799891 countsByYear W20457998912019 @default.
• W2045799891 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045799891 hasAuthorship W2045799891A5021331819 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConceptScore W2045799891C111472728 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConceptScore W2045799891C11171543 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConceptScore W2045799891C138885662 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConceptScore W2045799891C15744967 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConceptScore W2045799891C17744445 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConceptScore W2045799891C199539241 @default.
• W2045799891 hasConceptScore W2045799891C7991579 @default.
• W2045799891 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2045799891 hasLocation W20457998911 @default.
• W2045799891 hasOpenAccess W2045799891 @default.
• W2045799891 hasPrimaryLocation W20457998911 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W2017831035 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W2070051673 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W2108004692 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W2800390539 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W2911125927 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W2944502674 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W3140514088 @default.
• W2045799891 hasRelatedWork W4239856498 @default.
• W2045799891 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W2045799891 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2045799891 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2045799891 magId "2045799891" @default.
• W2045799891 workType "article" @default.