FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2045896124> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2045896124 endingPage "e87470" @default.
• W2045896124 startingPage "e87470" @default.
• W2045896124 abstract "Post-chiasmal visual pathway lesions and glaucomatous optic neuropathy cause binocular visual field defects (VFDs) that may critically interfere with quality of life and driving licensure. The aims of this study were (i) to assess the on-road driving performance of patients suffering from binocular visual field loss using a dual-brake vehicle, and (ii) to investigate the related compensatory mechanisms. A driving instructor, blinded to the participants' diagnosis, rated the driving performance (passed/failed) of ten patients with homonymous visual field defects (HP), including four patients with right (HR) and six patients with left homonymous visual field defects (HL), ten glaucoma patients (GP), and twenty age and gender-related ophthalmologically healthy control subjects (C) during a 40-minute driving task on a pre-specified public on-road parcours. In order to investigate the subjects' visual exploration ability, eye movements were recorded by means of a mobile eye tracker. Two additional cameras were used to monitor the driving scene and record head and shoulder movements. Thus this study is novel as a quantitative assessment of eye movements and an additional evaluation of head and shoulder was performed. Six out of ten HP and four out of ten GP were rated as fit to drive by the driving instructor, despite their binocular visual field loss. Three out of 20 control subjects failed the on-road assessment. The extent of the visual field defect was of minor importance with regard to the driving performance. The site of the homonymous visual field defect (HVFD) critically interfered with the driving ability: all failed HP subjects suffered from left homonymous visual field loss (HL) due to right hemispheric lesions. Patients who failed the driving assessment had mainly difficulties with lane keeping and gap judgment ability. Patients who passed the test displayed different exploration patterns than those who failed. Patients who passed focused longer on the central area of the visual field than patients who failed the test. In addition, patients who passed the test performed more glances towards the area of their visual field defect. In conclusion, our findings support the hypothesis that the extent of visual field per se cannot predict driving fitness, because some patients with HVFDs and advanced glaucoma can compensate for their deficit by effective visual scanning. Head movements appeared to be superior to eye and shoulder movements in predicting the outcome of the driving test under the present study scenario." @default.
• W2045896124 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2045896124 creator A5004001588 @default.
• W2045896124 creator A5008809634 @default.
• W2045896124 creator A5015532856 @default.
• W2045896124 creator A5018140324 @default.
• W2045896124 creator A5045543884 @default.
• W2045896124 creator A5078024775 @default.
• W2045896124 creator A5087076980 @default.
• W2045896124 date "2014-02-11" @default.
• W2045896124 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2045896124 title "Driving with Binocular Visual Field Loss? A Study on a Supervised On-Road Parcours with Simultaneous Eye and Head Tracking" @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1808400198 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1968200607 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1977335360 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1981287339 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1981316538 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1982876872 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1983741932 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1984996369 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1986797174 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W1987226423 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2000617596 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2001813842 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2003396584 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2006565335 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2011365870 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2019622160 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2019979290 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2021188996 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2025688011 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2033124735 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2040253108 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2041526431 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2044963638 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2048310774 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2049755603 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2050695866 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2052200849 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2053562333 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2057266151 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2065564499 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2065587012 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2066208434 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2077082924 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2084647210 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2086316707 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2092788111 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2096440712 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2112391377 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2132369307 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2135343983 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2140640024 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W2149357726 @default.
• W2045896124 cites W4229614967 @default.
• W2045896124 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087470" @default.
• W2045896124 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3921141" @default.
• W2045896124 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24523869" @default.
• W2045896124 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2045896124 type Work @default.
• W2045896124 sameAs 2045896124 @default.
• W2045896124 citedByCount "111" @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242014 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242015 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242016 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242017 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242018 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242019 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242020 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242021 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242022 @default.
• W2045896124 countsByYear W20458961242023 @default.
• W2045896124 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2045896124 hasAuthorship W2045896124A5004001588 @default.
• W2045896124 hasAuthorship W2045896124A5008809634 @default.
• W2045896124 hasAuthorship W2045896124A5015532856 @default.
• W2045896124 hasAuthorship W2045896124A5018140324 @default.
• W2045896124 hasAuthorship W2045896124A5045543884 @default.
• W2045896124 hasAuthorship W2045896124A5078024775 @default.
• W2045896124 hasAuthorship W2045896124A5087076980 @default.
• W2045896124 hasBestOaLocation W20458961241 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C121958486 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C153050134 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C2776058522 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C2776661019 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C2780689630 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C56461940 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2045896124 hasConcept C99508421 @default.

• next