FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2046002451> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2046002451 endingPage "91" @default.
• W2046002451 startingPage "71" @default.
• W2046002451 abstract "Abstract This research suggests that consumers' marginal willingness to pay for environmental landscape attributes, such as water view, developed open space and forest-land open space, decreased during the 2008 recession compared to the 2000–2006 real estate boom. Estimates were obtained from a spatial hedonic housing price model after controlling for household location patterns and structural differences between the periods. Because the decline in amenity values was probably due to a temporary deterioration in economic conditions, the amenity values will probably rebound with economic recovery. Thus, development decisions based on the lower estimated amenity values measured during a temporary deterioration in economic conditions may be determined suboptimal post-economic recovery. Keywords: environmental amenitylandscapereal estate boomrecessionspatial hedonic model Acknowledgements The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the University of Tennessee. The authors wish to thank the co-editors of the special issue, Drs. Oueslati and Salanié and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. The authors also thank the Metro Planning Department, Davidson County and the Davidson County Tax Assessor's Office for providing the individual parcel data. Notes 1. A detailed description of the buffer can be found in the Study Areas and Data section. 2. The details of the model description immediately follow. 3. Previous studies suggest that the BIC outperforms other information criterion, e.g. the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Posterior Information Criterion (PIC), in models with large sample sizes (Wang and Bessler Citation2005, Citation2009). 4. In general, no consensus exists on which weights are most appropriate for any econometric study (Anselin Citation1988), and the selection of appropriate weight matrices remains a challenge to practitioners (Le Gallo and Ertur Citation2003). Florax and Rey (Citation1995) discuss some problems that may arise if spatial weight matrices are poorly selected. In an ex post analysis, when the two and four nearest neighbours for the spatial weight matrix were used, both spatial error and lag were significant in both periods. While it is difficult to conclude that the W matrix used in this study is the best of all possible neighbourhood specifications, the Wald tests for the second and third sets of regressions using the two and four nearest neighbour weight matrices are encouraging in this respect. 5. To compare the difference between results using the sub-sample of repeated sales and full sample of sales transactions, the same model was estimated using the full sample. The results using the full sample indicate that the effects of landscape variables on housing prices are not qualitatively different but quantitatively different with minor variations between the two periods. The results using the full sample are available upon request." @default.
• W2046002451 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2046002451 creator A5006977403 @default.
• W2046002451 creator A5038701196 @default.
• W2046002451 creator A5069419899 @default.
• W2046002451 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2046002451 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2046002451 title "Values of environmental landscape amenities during the 2000–2006 real estate boom and subsequent 2008 recession" @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1539860725 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1564957762 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1587024057 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1607482941 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1822429195 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1963630346 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1978569753 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1979417251 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1991442346 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1991553333 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W1998551134 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2009153212 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2011858660 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2013727697 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2014594672 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2021201910 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2023122141 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2028226037 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2034284099 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2039262733 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2043945083 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2044539664 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2052299523 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2057570443 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2069341621 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2077216414 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2083959319 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2091375926 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2108471908 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2115034263 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2125778703 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2144751663 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2168175751 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W2400272734 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W3123394386 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W4230091325 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W4234549660 @default.
• W2046002451 cites W46334169 @default.
• W2046002451 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.502760" @default.
• W2046002451 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2046002451 type Work @default.
• W2046002451 sameAs 2046002451 @default.
• W2046002451 citedByCount "43" @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512012 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512013 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512014 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512015 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512016 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512017 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512018 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512019 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512020 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512021 @default.
• W2046002451 countsByYear W20460024512023 @default.
• W2046002451 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2046002451 hasAuthorship W2046002451A5006977403 @default.
• W2046002451 hasAuthorship W2046002451A5038701196 @default.
• W2046002451 hasAuthorship W2046002451A5069419899 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C126674687 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C141441539 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C195742910 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C2778362435 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C2778572836 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C2994591601 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C82279013 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConcept C87717796 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C10138342 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C105795698 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C111919701 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C126674687 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C139719470 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C141441539 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C149782125 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C162324750 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C185592680 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C195742910 @default.
• W2046002451 hasConceptScore W2046002451C198531522 @default.

• next