Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2046246593> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 50 of
50
with 100 items per page.
- W2046246593 endingPage "1105" @default.
- W2046246593 startingPage "1105" @default.
- W2046246593 abstract "Stressing the need for more multidisciplinary approaches to tackle scientific problems is always a safe position to take during discussions on the future of the biological sciences. The common belief that interesting things are happening at the boundaries of different research fields is of course true. But interesting things also happen right at the core of individual research disciplines, whereas boundaries can create clashes and misunderstandings. Although I believe that truly interdisciplinary approaches are central to much of the most advanced research today, I am somewhat sceptical about interdisciplinarity being elevated to a position that is superior to other, more conventional, approaches.First, however, let me clarify some terms. Interdisciplinarity is the “emergence of insight and understanding of a problem domain through the integration or derivation of different concepts, methods, and epistemologies from different disciplines in a novel way” (Rogers et al , 2005). The same document describes multidisciplinary research as occurring “when a group of researchers from different disciplines cooperate by working together on the same problem towards a common goal but …" @default.
- W2046246593 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2046246593 creator A5077931719 @default.
- W2046246593 date "2005-12-01" @default.
- W2046246593 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
- W2046246593 title "Multidisciplinarity: by fiat or need?" @default.
- W2046246593 cites W756356273 @default.
- W2046246593 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400590" @default.
- W2046246593 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1369220" @default.
- W2046246593 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16319953" @default.
- W2046246593 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2046246593 type Work @default.
- W2046246593 sameAs 2046246593 @default.
- W2046246593 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W2046246593 countsByYear W20462465932012 @default.
- W2046246593 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2046246593 hasAuthorship W2046246593A5077931719 @default.
- W2046246593 hasBestOaLocation W20462465932 @default.
- W2046246593 hasConcept C126285488 @default.
- W2046246593 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2046246593 hasConcept C165556158 @default.
- W2046246593 hasConcept C2780589280 @default.
- W2046246593 hasConceptScore W2046246593C126285488 @default.
- W2046246593 hasConceptScore W2046246593C162324750 @default.
- W2046246593 hasConceptScore W2046246593C165556158 @default.
- W2046246593 hasConceptScore W2046246593C2780589280 @default.
- W2046246593 hasIssue "12" @default.
- W2046246593 hasLocation W20462465931 @default.
- W2046246593 hasLocation W20462465932 @default.
- W2046246593 hasLocation W20462465933 @default.
- W2046246593 hasLocation W20462465934 @default.
- W2046246593 hasOpenAccess W2046246593 @default.
- W2046246593 hasPrimaryLocation W20462465931 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W1589332409 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W1975204045 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W2009180614 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W2082625469 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W2125598380 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W2207333307 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W2490808937 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W2561663 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W2903260284 @default.
- W2046246593 hasRelatedWork W3124979968 @default.
- W2046246593 hasVolume "6" @default.
- W2046246593 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2046246593 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2046246593 magId "2046246593" @default.
- W2046246593 workType "article" @default.