FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2046495524> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2046495524 endingPage "19" @default.
• W2046495524 startingPage "14" @default.
• W2046495524 abstract "Background Televised anti-tobacco advertising has been shown to be effective for discouraging smoking initiation; however, purchasing broadcasting time is very costly. This study investigated the relative impact of the broadcast volume (media weight) and the emotional content of an ad as predictors of advertising recall. Methods The data come from a random-digit-dialed survey conducted in 2001 and 2002 of 3863 youth aged 12–17. Media weight was based on commercial TV ratings data. The emotional intensity of advertisements was derived from the ratings made by independent youth judges. Results Data analyses were conducted between 2005 and 2007. Results indicated that media weight was a significant predictor of recall, but the emotional content of the ad was an even stronger predictor. Also, ads low in emotional intensity required more media weight than those high in emotional intensity to achieve the same amount of increase in recall. Conclusions This study extends prior research that highlights the importance of emotional intensity for effective anti-tobacco advertising. It also indicates that, relative to unemotional advertisements, emotionally arousing advertisements require fewer broadcasts to achieve the same level of recall, and hence are likely to be less costly to a public health campaign. Televised anti-tobacco advertising has been shown to be effective for discouraging smoking initiation; however, purchasing broadcasting time is very costly. This study investigated the relative impact of the broadcast volume (media weight) and the emotional content of an ad as predictors of advertising recall. The data come from a random-digit-dialed survey conducted in 2001 and 2002 of 3863 youth aged 12–17. Media weight was based on commercial TV ratings data. The emotional intensity of advertisements was derived from the ratings made by independent youth judges. Data analyses were conducted between 2005 and 2007. Results indicated that media weight was a significant predictor of recall, but the emotional content of the ad was an even stronger predictor. Also, ads low in emotional intensity required more media weight than those high in emotional intensity to achieve the same amount of increase in recall. This study extends prior research that highlights the importance of emotional intensity for effective anti-tobacco advertising. It also indicates that, relative to unemotional advertisements, emotionally arousing advertisements require fewer broadcasts to achieve the same level of recall, and hence are likely to be less costly to a public health campaign." @default.
• W2046495524 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2046495524 creator A5004522239 @default.
• W2046495524 creator A5025694016 @default.
• W2046495524 creator A5065592161 @default.
• W2046495524 creator A5077262186 @default.
• W2046495524 date "2008-07-01" @default.
• W2046495524 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2046495524 title "How Broadcast Volume and Emotional Content Affect Youth Recall of Anti-Tobacco Advertising" @default.
• W2046495524 cites W1497943810 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W1558549572 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W1970469535 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W1983318220 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W1997092577 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2000186419 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2015624331 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2016638605 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2019286581 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2051167783 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2051423449 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2065322248 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2073861108 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2083034885 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2089751587 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2107673229 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2117296805 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2117547352 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2125941663 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2127440586 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2132066426 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2141352637 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2148660772 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2152587843 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2160896041 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2163330027 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2166355918 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W2171599218 @default.
• W2046495524 cites W4238003824 @default.
• W2046495524 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.018" @default.
• W2046495524 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2464355" @default.
• W2046495524 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18482819" @default.
• W2046495524 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2046495524 type Work @default.
• W2046495524 sameAs 2046495524 @default.
• W2046495524 citedByCount "52" @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242012 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242013 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242014 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242015 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242016 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242017 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242018 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242019 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242020 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242021 @default.
• W2046495524 countsByYear W20464955242022 @default.
• W2046495524 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2046495524 hasAuthorship W2046495524A5004522239 @default.
• W2046495524 hasAuthorship W2046495524A5025694016 @default.
• W2046495524 hasAuthorship W2046495524A5065592161 @default.
• W2046495524 hasAuthorship W2046495524A5077262186 @default.
• W2046495524 hasBestOaLocation W20464955242 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C100660578 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C2778813691 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C100660578 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C112698675 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C144133560 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C15744967 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C162853370 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C180747234 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C2776035688 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C2778813691 @default.
• W2046495524 hasConceptScore W2046495524C46312422 @default.
• W2046495524 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2046495524 hasLocation W20464955241 @default.
• W2046495524 hasLocation W20464955242 @default.
• W2046495524 hasLocation W20464955243 @default.
• W2046495524 hasLocation W20464955244 @default.
• W2046495524 hasOpenAccess W2046495524 @default.
• W2046495524 hasPrimaryLocation W20464955241 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W1195633823 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W1980207415 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W1988731796 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W2023277482 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W2048337897 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W2049133647 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W2089583696 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W2323000064 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W2370337717 @default.
• W2046495524 hasRelatedWork W2795330374 @default.
• W2046495524 hasVolume "35" @default.

• next