FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2046975935> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2046975935 endingPage "1462" @default.
• W2046975935 startingPage "1455" @default.
• W2046975935 abstract "BackgroundDiabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are at greater risk of late morbidity and mortality than nondiabetic patients. We questioned earlier comparisons of these two approaches that showed no differences in survival rates. This study compares drug-eluting stents (DES) and bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.MethodsAll diabetic patients who underwent left-sided arterial revascularization with BITA grafting between January 2002 and May 2006 were evaluated. Their outcomes were compared with those of diabetic patients who underwent PCI with DES (Cypher). The Cox proportional hazards model defined predictors of outcome events after forcing propensity score with patients' characteristics into the model.ResultsThe outcomes of 226 BITA patients were compared with those of 271 DES patients (mean follow-up 62 months). The 5-year reintervention-free survival (Kaplan-Meier 86% versus 65%, log rank p = 0.000) and major adverse cardiovascular events–free survival (81% versus 54%, p = 0.001) were significantly better in the BITA group. Assignment to the PCI group was associated with decreased adjusted survival (hazard ratio 3.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.59 to 5.73, p = 0.000) and increased risk of target vessel reinterventions (hazard ratio 7.00, 95% confidence interval: 3.1 to 15.70). The adjusted risk of major adverse cardiovascular events increased with the number of DES-treated vessels.ConclusionsThis is the first demonstration of significantly better long-term adjusted survival and outcomes of diabetic patients who underwent CABG with BITA grafting compared with diabetic patients who underwent PCI with DES. Diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are at greater risk of late morbidity and mortality than nondiabetic patients. We questioned earlier comparisons of these two approaches that showed no differences in survival rates. This study compares drug-eluting stents (DES) and bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. All diabetic patients who underwent left-sided arterial revascularization with BITA grafting between January 2002 and May 2006 were evaluated. Their outcomes were compared with those of diabetic patients who underwent PCI with DES (Cypher). The Cox proportional hazards model defined predictors of outcome events after forcing propensity score with patients' characteristics into the model. The outcomes of 226 BITA patients were compared with those of 271 DES patients (mean follow-up 62 months). The 5-year reintervention-free survival (Kaplan-Meier 86% versus 65%, log rank p = 0.000) and major adverse cardiovascular events–free survival (81% versus 54%, p = 0.001) were significantly better in the BITA group. Assignment to the PCI group was associated with decreased adjusted survival (hazard ratio 3.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.59 to 5.73, p = 0.000) and increased risk of target vessel reinterventions (hazard ratio 7.00, 95% confidence interval: 3.1 to 15.70). The adjusted risk of major adverse cardiovascular events increased with the number of DES-treated vessels. This is the first demonstration of significantly better long-term adjusted survival and outcomes of diabetic patients who underwent CABG with BITA grafting compared with diabetic patients who underwent PCI with DES." @default.
• W2046975935 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2046975935 creator A5001560923 @default.
• W2046975935 creator A5003040407 @default.
• W2046975935 creator A5016236012 @default.
• W2046975935 creator A5025489540 @default.
• W2046975935 creator A5027689416 @default.
• W2046975935 creator A5028489668 @default.
• W2046975935 creator A5051459114 @default.
• W2046975935 creator A5082175499 @default.
• W2046975935 date "2012-11-01" @default.
• W2046975935 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2046975935 title "Drug-Eluting Stents Compared With Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts for Diabetic Patients" @default.
• W2046975935 cites W1437166545 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W1993051841 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W1996637683 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W1999801928 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2019864608 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2034236899 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2036720093 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2051686671 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2054908104 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2070280049 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2103434706 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2112494872 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2115659610 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2119476836 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2123912984 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2125730125 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2133525542 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2140991303 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2146743728 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2164658066 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2169132724 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2169226612 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2314047347 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2341375528 @default.
• W2046975935 cites W2543050600 @default.
• W2046975935 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.026" @default.
• W2046975935 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22748647" @default.
• W2046975935 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2046975935 type Work @default.
• W2046975935 sameAs 2046975935 @default.
• W2046975935 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2046975935 countsByYear W20469759352013 @default.
• W2046975935 countsByYear W20469759352014 @default.
• W2046975935 countsByYear W20469759352015 @default.
• W2046975935 countsByYear W20469759352016 @default.
• W2046975935 countsByYear W20469759352017 @default.
• W2046975935 countsByYear W20469759352019 @default.
• W2046975935 countsByYear W20469759352022 @default.
• W2046975935 countsByYear W20469759352023 @default.
• W2046975935 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2046975935 hasAuthorship W2046975935A5001560923 @default.
• W2046975935 hasAuthorship W2046975935A5003040407 @default.
• W2046975935 hasAuthorship W2046975935A5016236012 @default.
• W2046975935 hasAuthorship W2046975935A5025489540 @default.
• W2046975935 hasAuthorship W2046975935A5027689416 @default.
• W2046975935 hasAuthorship W2046975935A5028489668 @default.
• W2046975935 hasAuthorship W2046975935A5051459114 @default.
• W2046975935 hasAuthorship W2046975935A5082175499 @default.
• W2046975935 hasBestOaLocation W20469759351 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C2777546689 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C2779670087 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C2780400711 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C3017915907 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C45393284 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C126322002 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C141071460 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C164705383 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C207103383 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C2776820930 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C2777546689 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C2778213512 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C2779464278 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C2779670087 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C2780400711 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C3017915907 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C44249647 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C45393284 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C500558357 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C50382708 @default.
• W2046975935 hasConceptScore W2046975935C71924100 @default.
• W2046975935 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2046975935 hasLocation W20469759351 @default.
• W2046975935 hasLocation W20469759352 @default.
• W2046975935 hasOpenAccess W2046975935 @default.

• next