FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2047938669> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2047938669 endingPage "670" @default.
• W2047938669 startingPage "662" @default.
• W2047938669 abstract "Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of small-scale living facilities in dementia care on residents, family caregivers, and staff. Design This was a quasi-experimental study including 2 types of institutional nursing care: small-scale living facilities (experimental group), and regular psychogeriatric nursing home wards (control group). Three measures were conducted: at baseline and follow-ups after 6 and 12 months. Setting Twenty-eight houses in small-scale living facilities and 21 regular psychogeriatric nursing home wards. Participants In total, 259 residents were included in the study: 124 in small-scale living facilities and 135 controls, matched on cognitive and functional status. Furthermore, 229 family caregivers were included and 305 staff members. Measurements For residents, main outcome measures were quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and agitation. Main outcome measures for family caregivers included perceived burden, satisfaction, and involvement with care. Main outcome measures for staff were job satisfaction and motivation. Results No effects were found for residents’ total quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and agitation. Family caregivers in small-scale living reported significantly less burden (adjusted mean difference 0.8, 95% CI 0.1–1.5) and were more satisfied with nursing staff (0.3, 0.2–0.5) than family caregivers in regular wards. No differences were found in their involvement with care. Overall, no significant differences were found for staff’s job satisfaction and motivation, although subgroup analyses using contrast groups (regarding typical small-scale living and regular wards) revealed more job satisfaction (2.0, 0.5–3.5) and motivation (0.6, 0.0–1.3) in small-scale living compared with regular wards. Conclusion This study was unable to demonstrate convincing overall effects of small-scale living facilities. Because governmental policies and, in some countries, financial support, are increasingly aimed at providing small-scale, homelike care, it is suggested that this may not be a final solution to accomplish high-quality dementia care and that other options should be considered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of small-scale living facilities in dementia care on residents, family caregivers, and staff. This was a quasi-experimental study including 2 types of institutional nursing care: small-scale living facilities (experimental group), and regular psychogeriatric nursing home wards (control group). Three measures were conducted: at baseline and follow-ups after 6 and 12 months. Twenty-eight houses in small-scale living facilities and 21 regular psychogeriatric nursing home wards. In total, 259 residents were included in the study: 124 in small-scale living facilities and 135 controls, matched on cognitive and functional status. Furthermore, 229 family caregivers were included and 305 staff members. For residents, main outcome measures were quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and agitation. Main outcome measures for family caregivers included perceived burden, satisfaction, and involvement with care. Main outcome measures for staff were job satisfaction and motivation. No effects were found for residents’ total quality of life, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and agitation. Family caregivers in small-scale living reported significantly less burden (adjusted mean difference 0.8, 95% CI 0.1–1.5) and were more satisfied with nursing staff (0.3, 0.2–0.5) than family caregivers in regular wards. No differences were found in their involvement with care. Overall, no significant differences were found for staff’s job satisfaction and motivation, although subgroup analyses using contrast groups (regarding typical small-scale living and regular wards) revealed more job satisfaction (2.0, 0.5–3.5) and motivation (0.6, 0.0–1.3) in small-scale living compared with regular wards. This study was unable to demonstrate convincing overall effects of small-scale living facilities. Because governmental policies and, in some countries, financial support, are increasingly aimed at providing small-scale, homelike care, it is suggested that this may not be a final solution to accomplish high-quality dementia care and that other options should be considered." @default.
• W2047938669 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2047938669 creator A5001616422 @default.
• W2047938669 creator A5001880644 @default.
• W2047938669 creator A5044708371 @default.
• W2047938669 creator A5067150239 @default.
• W2047938669 creator A5079327225 @default.
• W2047938669 creator A5083927413 @default.
• W2047938669 date "2010-11-01" @default.
• W2047938669 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2047938669 title "Dementia Care Redesigned: Effects of Small-Scale Living Facilities on Residents, Their Family Caregivers, and Staff" @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1489480588 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1506516887 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1644143258 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1847168837 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1969663483 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1978830176 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1990657623 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1992221772 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W1996128453 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2014886338 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2021870354 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2103037864 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2107981536 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2114981304 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2129114099 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2143234754 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2154369079 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2156108756 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2169663472 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2171820264 @default.
• W2047938669 cites W2172032970 @default.
• W2047938669 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2010.08.001" @default.
• W2047938669 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21030001" @default.
• W2047938669 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2047938669 type Work @default.
• W2047938669 sameAs 2047938669 @default.
• W2047938669 citedByCount "110" @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692012 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692013 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692014 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692015 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692016 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692017 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692018 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692019 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692020 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692021 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692022 @default.
• W2047938669 countsByYear W20479386692023 @default.
• W2047938669 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2047938669 hasAuthorship W2047938669A5001616422 @default.
• W2047938669 hasAuthorship W2047938669A5001880644 @default.
• W2047938669 hasAuthorship W2047938669A5044708371 @default.
• W2047938669 hasAuthorship W2047938669A5067150239 @default.
• W2047938669 hasAuthorship W2047938669A5079327225 @default.
• W2047938669 hasAuthorship W2047938669A5083927413 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C2718322 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C2778900529 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C2779878486 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C2780233487 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C3019398978 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConcept C79544238 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C118552586 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C121332964 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C142724271 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C15744967 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C159110408 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C2718322 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C2778755073 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C2778900529 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C2779134260 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C2779483572 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C2779878486 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C2779951463 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C2780233487 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C3019398978 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C512399662 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C62520636 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C71924100 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C74909509 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C77805123 @default.
• W2047938669 hasConceptScore W2047938669C79544238 @default.
• W2047938669 hasIssue "9" @default.

• next