FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2047958011> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2047958011 endingPage "1503" @default.
• W2047958011 startingPage "1502" @default.
• W2047958011 abstract "We thank Brown et al. for commenting on our work. In the article they mention,1 they used an infrared-capable digital video camera to capture still images of the pupil, reviewed the images on a computer, and selected the clearest photograph for analysis. In contrast, we used an infrared-capable digital still camera to capture pupil images under the scotopic condition. Compared with the capture function of a digital video camera, a digital still camera can acquire sharper still images and obtain serial images at constant intervals (burst-shot function). We used the continuous-shot function of the camera so we could take 7 well-focused serial images in 2.8 seconds at a constant interval of 400 milliseconds. We did not select images randomly according to image quality,1,2 but chose the image containing the largest pupil diameter from among the 7 serial images to overcome pupillary unrest. The 400-millisecond interval of the serial photographs may not be sufficient to find the largest diameter of the pupil under the scotopic condition, and higher-speed devices might be more accurate. Multiple-measurement digital infrared pupillometers that can acquire serial images at speeds up to 25 frames per second are available.3 Nevertheless, the largest recorded pupil diameter might represent the scotopic pupil size better than an average or even a randomly selected reading.4 In the article by Bradley et al.2 comparing the infrared photographic method with the Colvard pupillometer, the accuracy of the pupil diameter measurement using the Colvard pupillometer was investigated using digital photography as a standard. The authors used Bland-Altman analysis to compare the Colvard pupillometer and infrared digital photography, but the repeatability of each device was not investigated. The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy of burst-shot infrared digital photography with the Colvard pupillometer in terms of repeatability, so we cannot compare our data with the work by Bradley et al.2 However, when using the Colvard pupillometer, the possible sources of errors they noted should be considered. Again, we thank Brown et al. for drawing attention to articles related to our work and elucidating the differences between our study and those of others." @default.
• W2047958011 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2047958011 creator A5014529982 @default.
• W2047958011 creator A5031503814 @default.
• W2047958011 date "2007-09-01" @default.
• W2047958011 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2047958011 title "Reply : Burst-shot infrared digital photography for measuring low-light pupil" @default.
• W2047958011 cites W2014123160 @default.
• W2047958011 cites W2142981366 @default.
• W2047958011 cites W2158544709 @default.
• W2047958011 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.044" @default.
• W2047958011 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2047958011 type Work @default.
• W2047958011 sameAs 2047958011 @default.
• W2047958011 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2047958011 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2047958011 hasAuthorship W2047958011A5014529982 @default.
• W2047958011 hasAuthorship W2047958011A5031503814 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C119657128 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C16282426 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C2777093970 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C2777394604 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C2779705975 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConcept C7243750 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C119657128 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C120665830 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C121332964 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C142362112 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C153349607 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C154945302 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C16282426 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C2777093970 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C2777394604 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C2779705975 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C31972630 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C41008148 @default.
• W2047958011 hasConceptScore W2047958011C7243750 @default.
• W2047958011 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2047958011 hasLocation W20479580111 @default.
• W2047958011 hasOpenAccess W2047958011 @default.
• W2047958011 hasPrimaryLocation W20479580111 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W1866425048 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W2035648653 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W2064609494 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W2090899135 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W2148725491 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W2161834109 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W2320174866 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W2363431531 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W276445467 @default.
• W2047958011 hasRelatedWork W3119850247 @default.
• W2047958011 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2047958011 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2047958011 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2047958011 magId "2047958011" @default.
• W2047958011 workType "article" @default.