FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2048652969> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2048652969 endingPage "1700" @default.
• W2048652969 startingPage "1691" @default.
• W2048652969 abstract "A radiologic analytical study.To compare the reliability of lumbar lordosis (LL) measurement in cases of spondylolisthesis using the Cobb, vertebral centroid, and posterior tangent methods.Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of the several different types of lumbar curvature analysis have been reported using various methods for measurement; however, in patients with spondylolisthesis, it has not been studied till yet.A radiologic analytical study was performed in 50 patients who had spondylolisthesis (28 at L4-L5, 22 at L5-S1) with lysis in the lumbar spine. All patients had instability of more than 10 degrees on the lumbar spine flexion and extension radiogram. A total of 26 patients who presented for backache without spondylolisthesis were considered as control group. Three observers measured the global and segmental angle for LL using various methods for measuring the LL using the Cobb, vertebral centroid, and Harrison's posterior tangent methods. All measurements were done by each of the observers on the same computer by keeping at least 2 weeks of interval between 2 sets of measurements. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated among all the 3 observers' 2 sets of measurements by using the inter- and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test on SPSS program.Five global and 17 segmental angles measured overall. Results showed an excellent ICC (>0.7) while measuring the global LL using any method, the Cobb (T12-S1 or L1-L5), vertebral centroid, and Harrison's posterior tangent (T12-S1 or L1-L5) methods, in both subject and control groups. Similarly measuring the segmental angles, it exhibited excellent intraclass correlation (ICC, >0.7) coefficient by using all 3 methods for all segmental angles in both groups. However, interclass correlation coefficient was excellent (ICCs, >0.7) in both global as well as segmental angles for vertebral centroid and posterior tangent methods in subject and control groups, but it was poor or fair for the Cobb methods in segmental angles and good or excellent in global angles. Measuring the segmental angles, standard error of mean (SEM) was <2 degrees at all the levels by all methods in both subject and control group except the L4-L5-S1 level by centroid method in subject group where SEM >2 degrees was found.Posterior tangent method should be used for the global and segmental angle analysis for the LL in cases with spinal instability because of (a) higher correlation coefficient for segmental angle measurements; (b) lower SEM at the instability level than the centroid method despite similar correlation coefficients; and (c) similar to the engineering analysis." @default.
• W2048652969 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2048652969 creator A5005100602 @default.
• W2048652969 creator A5036852402 @default.
• W2048652969 creator A5042867965 @default.
• W2048652969 creator A5047201282 @default.
• W2048652969 creator A5057221817 @default.
• W2048652969 creator A5083065347 @default.
• W2048652969 creator A5089771725 @default.
• W2048652969 date "2010-08-01" @default.
• W2048652969 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2048652969 title "Reliability of Lumbar Lordosis Measurement in Patients With Spondylolisthesis" @default.
• W2048652969 cites W152404302 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W1950493377 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W1969208783 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W1972386454 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W1987537025 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2000959823 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2002715854 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2002969872 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2003553839 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2041415739 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2044178924 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2044974276 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2049386383 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2050128306 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2064147774 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2069504475 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2082751711 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2095233123 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2139774746 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2141403362 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2286403959 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2328221614 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2335446318 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W4361867964 @default.
• W2048652969 cites W2069167644 @default.
• W2048652969 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181c9a75f" @default.
• W2048652969 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20543767" @default.
• W2048652969 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2048652969 type Work @default.
• W2048652969 sameAs 2048652969 @default.
• W2048652969 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692012 @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692013 @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692015 @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692017 @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692018 @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692019 @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692020 @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692021 @default.
• W2048652969 countsByYear W20486529692023 @default.
• W2048652969 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2048652969 hasAuthorship W2048652969A5005100602 @default.
• W2048652969 hasAuthorship W2048652969A5036852402 @default.
• W2048652969 hasAuthorship W2048652969A5042867965 @default.
• W2048652969 hasAuthorship W2048652969A5047201282 @default.
• W2048652969 hasAuthorship W2048652969A5057221817 @default.
• W2048652969 hasAuthorship W2048652969A5083065347 @default.
• W2048652969 hasAuthorship W2048652969A5089771725 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C2776623965 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C2778871979 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C2780307688 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C2780901121 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C2911152345 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C104709138 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C121332964 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C141071460 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C163258240 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C171606756 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C2776623965 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C2778871979 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C2780307688 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C2780901121 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C2911152345 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C29694066 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C2989005 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C36454342 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C43214815 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C44575665 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C62520636 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C70410870 @default.
• W2048652969 hasConceptScore W2048652969C71924100 @default.
• W2048652969 hasIssue "18" @default.
• W2048652969 hasLocation W20486529691 @default.

• next