FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2049343210> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2049343210 endingPage "858" @default.
• W2049343210 startingPage "855" @default.
• W2049343210 abstract "The purpose of this study was to compare skinfold caliper and ultrasound measurement of subcutaneous body fat at three abdominal sites with computed tomography, which is considered to be the gold standard.This was a cross-sectional study in which computed-tomography, ultrasound, and skinfold caliper measurements were made at three distinct abdominal sites. All body composition and anthropometric measurements were performed on each subject on one occasion.Twenty-two subjects were recruited (13 men and 9 women). Mean ages (+/- standard deviation) were 43 +/- 4 years for the women and 51 +/- 18 years for the men. All subjects had been previously scheduled for an abdominal or pelvic computed-tomography scan at the Department of Radiology, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and participated in the study on a volunteer basis.A better agreement was found between the skinfold calipers and computed-tomography methods than between the ultrasound and computed-tomography method for the measurement of subcutaneous body fat. This was observed when the data were analyzed for both correlational agreement and for graphical interpretation.The relationships among skinfold, ultrasound, and computed-tomography measurements were analyzed by determining Pearson correlation coefficients. A graphical method described by Bland and Altman was also used to assess agreement among the three methods.Significant correlation coefficients were observed between skinfold calipers and computed tomography at all three abdominal sites (site 1, r = .60, P = .003; site 2, r = .70, P = .0001; site 3, r = .73, P = .0001). Ultrasound and computed-tomography methods only showed a significant correlation at site 3 (r = .54; P = .009). The graphical method revealed that the variation in the ultrasound measurements was much greater than that of the skinfold measurements when compared to computed-tomography values.The results of this study indicated that relative agreement in the measurement of subcutaneous body fat between skinfold and computed-tomography measurements was superior to that exhibited between ultrasound and computed-tomography measurements. This finding enhances the potential use of skinfold calipers in the clinical setting, particularly in view of the fact that measurement of subcutaneous body fat at different body sites is becoming increasingly important for the characterization of risk of certain disease states." @default.
• W2049343210 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2049343210 creator A5007933683 @default.
• W2049343210 creator A5019470101 @default.
• W2049343210 creator A5022319126 @default.
• W2049343210 creator A5054455994 @default.
• W2049343210 creator A5062651945 @default.
• W2049343210 date "1994-08-01" @default.
• W2049343210 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2049343210 title "Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: Comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography" @default.
• W2049343210 cites W1523325334 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W1946423577 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W1976499525 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W1988610874 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W1998019369 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2019470653 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2021046375 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2040124635 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2061947960 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2078260221 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2125699966 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2136760292 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2151491689 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2154797259 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2165047605 @default.
• W2049343210 cites W2171266699 @default.
• W2049343210 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8223(94)92363-9" @default.
• W2049343210 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8046177" @default.
• W2049343210 hasPublicationYear "1994" @default.
• W2049343210 type Work @default.
• W2049343210 sameAs 2049343210 @default.
• W2049343210 citedByCount "110" @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102012 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102013 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102014 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102015 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102016 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102017 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102018 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102019 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102020 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102021 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102022 @default.
• W2049343210 countsByYear W20493432102023 @default.
• W2049343210 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2049343210 hasAuthorship W2049343210A5007933683 @default.
• W2049343210 hasAuthorship W2049343210A5019470101 @default.
• W2049343210 hasAuthorship W2049343210A5022319126 @default.
• W2049343210 hasAuthorship W2049343210A5054455994 @default.
• W2049343210 hasAuthorship W2049343210A5062651945 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C163716698 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C186738849 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C2779983558 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C61427482 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C126322002 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C126838900 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C143753070 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C163716698 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C186738849 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C2524010 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C2779983558 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C2989005 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C33923547 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C544519230 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C61427482 @default.
• W2049343210 hasConceptScore W2049343210C71924100 @default.
• W2049343210 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2049343210 hasLocation W20493432101 @default.
• W2049343210 hasLocation W20493432102 @default.
• W2049343210 hasOpenAccess W2049343210 @default.
• W2049343210 hasPrimaryLocation W20493432101 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W1976499525 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W2010149064 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W2019470653 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W2039942755 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W2049343210 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W2051016982 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W2060752512 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W2348985730 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W2410922083 @default.
• W2049343210 hasRelatedWork W3087275422 @default.
• W2049343210 hasVolume "94" @default.
• W2049343210 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2049343210 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2049343210 magId "2049343210" @default.
• W2049343210 workType "article" @default.