Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2049417369> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 87 of
87
with 100 items per page.
- W2049417369 endingPage "1878" @default.
- W2049417369 startingPage "1871" @default.
- W2049417369 abstract "In protein−ligand docking, the scoring function is responsible for identifying the correct pose of a particular ligand as well as separating ligands from nonligands. Recently there has been considerable interest in schemes that combine results from several scoring functions in an effort to achieve improved performance in virtual screens. One such scheme is consensus scoring, which involves combining the results from several rescoring experiments. Although there have been a number of studies that have investigated factors affecting success in consensus scoring, these studies have not addressed the question of why a rescoring strategy works in the first place. Here we propose and test two alternative hypotheses for why rescoring has the potential to improve results, using GOLD 4.0. The “consensus” hypothesis is that rescoring is a way of combining results from two scoring functions such that only true positives are likely to score highly. The “complementary” hypothesis is that the two scoring functions used in rescoring have complementary strengths; one is better at ranking actives with respect to inactives while the other is better at ranking poses of actives. We find that in general it is this hypothesis that explains success in a rescoring experiment. We also test an assumption of any rescoring method, which is that the scores obtained are representative of the fitness of the docked pose. We find that although rescored poses tended to have slightly higher clash values than their docked equivalents, in general the scores were representative." @default.
- W2049417369 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2049417369 creator A5006929803 @default.
- W2049417369 creator A5036721569 @default.
- W2049417369 creator A5079380346 @default.
- W2049417369 date "2009-07-31" @default.
- W2049417369 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2049417369 title "Testing Assumptions and Hypotheses for Rescoring Success in Protein−Ligand Docking" @default.
- W2049417369 cites W1605578858 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W1966011678 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W1973191530 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W1980949045 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W1983194490 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W1986568494 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2003356525 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2008005113 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2030686695 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2032817710 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2035292911 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2042024605 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2050456292 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2052030759 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2071717945 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2072682248 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2078819180 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2080982083 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2091723491 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2134334341 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2151175139 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2158360182 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2477850881 @default.
- W2049417369 cites W2949504121 @default.
- W2049417369 doi "https://doi.org/10.1021/ci900164f" @default.
- W2049417369 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19645429" @default.
- W2049417369 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2049417369 type Work @default.
- W2049417369 sameAs 2049417369 @default.
- W2049417369 citedByCount "32" @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692012 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692013 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692014 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692015 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692016 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692017 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692018 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692019 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692020 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692021 @default.
- W2049417369 countsByYear W20494173692022 @default.
- W2049417369 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2049417369 hasAuthorship W2049417369A5006929803 @default.
- W2049417369 hasAuthorship W2049417369A5036721569 @default.
- W2049417369 hasAuthorship W2049417369A5079380346 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConcept C2989486834 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConcept C64869954 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConceptScore W2049417369C119857082 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConceptScore W2049417369C154945302 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConceptScore W2049417369C189430467 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConceptScore W2049417369C2989486834 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConceptScore W2049417369C41008148 @default.
- W2049417369 hasConceptScore W2049417369C64869954 @default.
- W2049417369 hasIssue "8" @default.
- W2049417369 hasLocation W20494173691 @default.
- W2049417369 hasLocation W20494173692 @default.
- W2049417369 hasOpenAccess W2049417369 @default.
- W2049417369 hasPrimaryLocation W20494173691 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W2168411647 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W2187231432 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W2961085424 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W2999452969 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W3035887866 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W3202472472 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W4213116378 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W4286629047 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W4306674287 @default.
- W2049417369 hasRelatedWork W4224009465 @default.
- W2049417369 hasVolume "49" @default.
- W2049417369 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2049417369 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2049417369 magId "2049417369" @default.
- W2049417369 workType "article" @default.