FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2049600145> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2049600145 endingPage "194" @default.
• W2049600145 startingPage "194" @default.
• W2049600145 abstract "This study was designed to compare the clinicopathologic findings of an endoscopic polypectomy for malignant polyps with subsequent surgery and to evaluate the appropriateness of the pathologic finding criterion of the resection margin as an indicator for surgery in cases of malignant colorectal polyps.We examined the clinicopathologic characteristics, complications and prognoses among the patients who underwent a colonoscopic polypectomy in both our hospitals and at other hospitals from April 2003 and April 2010. These patients were divided into two groups, the group (non-operation group) that only underwent a polypectomy (n = 37) and the group (operation group) that underwent a polypectomy with subsequent surgery (n = 33).There were no differences between two groups in the ratios of the number of men to the number of women, the ages or the comorbidities. In terms of endoscopic findings, we found no differences between the two groups in the locations of the polyps, the sizes of the polyps, or the presence of stalks. However, ulceration of polyps was higher in the non-operation group (51.5% vs. 21.6%; P = 0.009), as was the case with submucosal invasion (75.8% vs. 16.2%; P < 0.005). When an endoscopic polypectomy was performed, incomplete resection margins and specimens with margins involved occurred more frequently in the operation group (93.9% vs. 51.4%; P < 0.005), but no residual tumor was detected in 31 of 33 (93.9%) patients in that group. One pathologist reviewed the specimens of 54 patients (operation group, 19; non-operation group, 36). Six of the 19 polyps (31.6%) in the operation group and fifteen of the 36 polyps (41.7%) in the non-operation group had a margin without cancer cells.We may accept the criterion of a safe margin, including a coagulation zone. A multidisciplinary approach has to be developed by surgeons, endoscopists and pathologists based on a discussion of the risk factors for the patient before making a decision on the treatment treatment." @default.
• W2049600145 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2049600145 creator A5001337013 @default.
• W2049600145 creator A5021724906 @default.
• W2049600145 creator A5088907346 @default.
• W2049600145 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2049600145 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2049600145 title "Value and Interpretation of Resection Margin after a Colonoscopic Polypectomy for Malignant Polyps" @default.
• W2049600145 cites W1485607499 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W1964028500 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W1968359212 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W1969867128 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W1979213817 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W1984167070 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W1992546382 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2013696262 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2021631690 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2023478385 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2030095649 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2058612995 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2074214186 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2100066812 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2107568657 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2109419711 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2124366073 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2153661233 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2155879541 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2164512508 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2171737758 @default.
• W2049600145 cites W2322183750 @default.
• W2049600145 doi "https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.194" @default.
• W2049600145 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3180600" @default.
• W2049600145 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21980590" @default.
• W2049600145 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2049600145 type Work @default.
• W2049600145 sameAs 2049600145 @default.
• W2049600145 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2049600145 countsByYear W20496001452013 @default.
• W2049600145 countsByYear W20496001452018 @default.
• W2049600145 countsByYear W20496001452020 @default.
• W2049600145 countsByYear W20496001452022 @default.
• W2049600145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2049600145 hasAuthorship W2049600145A5001337013 @default.
• W2049600145 hasAuthorship W2049600145A5021724906 @default.
• W2049600145 hasAuthorship W2049600145A5088907346 @default.
• W2049600145 hasBestOaLocation W20496001451 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C2778132481 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C2780581329 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C121608353 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C126322002 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C141071460 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C159110652 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C2778132481 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C2778435480 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C2780581329 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C526805850 @default.
• W2049600145 hasConceptScore W2049600145C71924100 @default.
• W2049600145 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2049600145 hasLocation W20496001451 @default.
• W2049600145 hasLocation W20496001452 @default.
• W2049600145 hasLocation W20496001453 @default.
• W2049600145 hasOpenAccess W2049600145 @default.
• W2049600145 hasPrimaryLocation W20496001451 @default.
• W2049600145 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2049600145 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2049600145 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2049600145 magId "2049600145" @default.
• W2049600145 workType "article" @default.