FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2049953060> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2049953060 endingPage "31" @default.
• W2049953060 startingPage "24" @default.
• W2049953060 abstract "In Brief Purpose: To compare different quantification tools based on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear area size. Methods: Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and near-infrared reflectance (IR) images were retrospectively evaluated in 23 patients with RPE tear after intravitreal injection for pigment epithelium detachment due to exudative age-related macular degeneration at baseline and additionally in 11 patients after 5.1 ± 1.8 months of follow-up. Retinal pigment epithelium tear area was measured by three independent readers using three methods: manually on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy FAF images, manually on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy IR images, and using an FAF-based semiautomated software. Results: Confidence intervals were 0.08 and 0.12 for FAF, 0.11 and 0.09 for FAF-based semiautomated software, and 0.25 and 0.27 for IR for intraobserver (Reader 1) and interobserver agreements (Readers 1 and 2), respectively. The average values of the square errors of the quantification methods were 0.040 ± 0.033 mm2 (FAF), 0.035 ± 0.060 mm2 (software), and 0.187 ± 0.219 mm2 (IR). Mean area of RPE tears at baseline given as the average measurement of all 3 readers using FAF-based semiautomated software was 5.77 ± 4.62 mm2 (range, 0.13–14.74 mm2). Follow-up measurements of unilobular RPE tears (8 patients) showed no change in lesion area size (0.14 ± 0.33 mm2); in contrast, multilobular RPE tears (3 patients) showed a progression in lesion area size of 1.80 ± 0.74 mm2. Conclusion: Manual FAF-based and semiautomated FAF-based quantifications of RPE tear area are accurate and reproducible and superior to manual IR-based measurement. Retinal pigment epithelium tear area quantification is clinically relevant regarding further intravitreal treatment, particularly in multilobular RPE tears. The aim of this study was to compare different quantification tools for assessment of area sizes of retinal pigment epithelium tears using a manual area measurement tool based on confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy near-infrared reflectance images, fundus autofluorescence, and using a semiautomated fundus autofluorescence–based software tool. Manual fundus autofluorescence–based and semiautomated fundus autofluorescence–based quantification of retinal pigment epithelium tear area proved to be accurate and reproducible. Results of manual infrared reflectance–based quantification, however, showed a much higher statistical spread. Retinal pigment epithelium tear area quantification is clinically relevant regarding intravitreal treatment, particularly in cases of multilobular retinal pigment epithelium tears." @default.
• W2049953060 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2049953060 creator A5000714876 @default.
• W2049953060 creator A5037018029 @default.
• W2049953060 creator A5052060292 @default.
• W2049953060 creator A5057179454 @default.
• W2049953060 creator A5075925349 @default.
• W2049953060 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2049953060 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2049953060 title "QUANTIFICATION OF RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM TEAR AREA IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION" @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1496737322 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1588491549 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1968125969 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1970134158 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1977855901 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1980777779 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1983604287 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1986410652 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W1996488113 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2012372812 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2014022250 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2015658390 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2020252056 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2020894837 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2031573748 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2036302317 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2046608494 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2061675576 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2069328147 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2070166603 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2071787111 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2074576770 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2075002601 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2087835242 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2094332240 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2110779366 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2112825519 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2114971425 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2131109619 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2143246929 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2419151784 @default.
• W2049953060 cites W2603205043 @default.
• W2049953060 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e3182947811" @default.
• W2049953060 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23743641" @default.
• W2049953060 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2049953060 type Work @default.
• W2049953060 sameAs 2049953060 @default.
• W2049953060 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602013 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602014 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602015 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602016 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602017 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602019 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602020 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602021 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602022 @default.
• W2049953060 countsByYear W20499530602023 @default.
• W2049953060 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2049953060 hasAuthorship W2049953060A5000714876 @default.
• W2049953060 hasAuthorship W2049953060A5037018029 @default.
• W2049953060 hasAuthorship W2049953060A5052060292 @default.
• W2049953060 hasAuthorship W2049953060A5057179454 @default.
• W2049953060 hasAuthorship W2049953060A5075925349 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C136009344 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2776391266 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2776403814 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2777093970 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2777474606 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2778024200 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2780623050 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2780827179 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C118487528 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C120665830 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C121332964 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C136009344 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C141071460 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C142724271 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2776391266 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2776403814 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2777093970 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2777474606 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2778024200 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2778275304 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2780623050 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2780827179 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C2781156865 @default.
• W2049953060 hasConceptScore W2049953060C71924100 @default.
• W2049953060 hasIssue "1" @default.

• next