FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2049989351> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2049989351 endingPage "318" @default.
• W2049989351 startingPage "308" @default.
• W2049989351 abstract "Avaliar e comparar a eficácia dos antifúngicos tópicos empregados no tratamento de cada dermatomicose. Foi desenvolvida uma revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos randomizados, publicados em português, espanhol ou inglês até julho de 2010, que comparassem o uso de antifúngicos azólicos e alilamínicos entre si ou com placebo, no tratamento de candidíase cutânea, e das tineas versicolor, pedis, cruris e corporis. Os desfechos de eficácia avaliados foram cura micológica ao final do tratamento e cura sustentada. Dos 4.424 estudos inicialmente identificados, 49 alcançaram os critérios de seleção, sendo incluídos nas metanálises. Os dados agrupados de eficácia demonstraram superioridade dos antifúngicos frente a placebo, independente da dermatomicose avaliada, com valores de odds ratio (OR) variando de 2,05 (IC 95% 1,18-3,54) a 67,53 (IC 95% 11,43-398,86). Alilaminas foram superiores aos azólicos apenas para o desfecho cura sustentada (OR 0,52 [IC 95% 0,31-0,89]). Há evidência consistente da superioridade dos antifúngicos com relação ao uso de placebo, não sendo mais justificável a realização de estudos controlados por placebo. Alilaminas mantêm a cura micológica por períodos mais extensos que fármacos azólicos. Dada a significativa diferença de custo entre as classes, recomenda-se a realização de análises farmacoeconômicas. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of topical antifungal drugs applied to the treatment of each dermatomycosis. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials, published in Portuguese, Spanish and English until July 2010, which compared the use of azole and allylamine antifungal drugs among themselves and with placebo in the treatment of cutaneous candidiasis and T. versicolor, T. pedis, T. cruris and T. corporis was performed. The efficacy outcomes evaluated were mycological cure at the end of treatment and sustained cure. Of the 4,424 studies initially identified, 49 met the selection criteria and were included in the meta-analyses. The grouped efficacy data evidenced the superiority of antifungal drugs compared to placebo, regardless of the dermatomycosis under evaluation, with odds ratio values ranging from 2.05 (95% CI 1.18-3.54) to 67.53 (95% CI 11.43-398.86). Allylamines were better than azoles only for the outcome sustained cure (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.31-0.89]). There is consistent evidence of the superiority of antifungal drugs over the use of placebo, and placebo-controlled studies are no longer justifiable. Allylamines maintain the mycological cure for longer periods compared to azole drugs. Given the significant cost difference among the classes, pharmacoeconomic analyses should be performed." @default.
• W2049989351 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2049989351 creator A5033131067 @default.
• W2049989351 creator A5045403266 @default.
• W2049989351 creator A5071123304 @default.
• W2049989351 creator A5075567914 @default.
• W2049989351 date "2012-05-01" @default.
• W2049989351 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2049989351 title "Eficácia de antifúngicos tópicos em diferentes dermatomicoses: uma revisão sistemática com metanálise" @default.
• W2049989351 cites W138913379 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1516123699 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1598602811 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1608014563 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W165137946 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W16629 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1893349977 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1905139547 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1969546880 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1970312945 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1971973040 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1972849835 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1976875582 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1978088609 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1978529122 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1980391630 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1986215651 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W1997266708 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2014917638 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2015912874 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2017503476 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2024705998 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2028757705 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2029293133 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2030235837 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2048045991 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2048316352 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2048689789 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2051541320 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2067949404 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2070151919 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2072135206 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2083968901 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2095051720 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2096072329 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2096912571 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2121849463 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2131154220 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2132741120 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2133545372 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2133746904 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2135034599 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2136253427 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2140313246 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2148843555 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2415665331 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2598936606 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2625099161 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W27885229 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2805712345 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W3087201244 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W3090723405 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W3215487237 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W695841 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W90575722 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W91731957 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W132676275 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2422932874 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2488660508 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2514543872 @default.
• W2049989351 cites W2520189595 @default.
• W2049989351 doi "https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-42302012000300010" @default.
• W2049989351 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2049989351 type Work @default.
• W2049989351 sameAs 2049989351 @default.
• W2049989351 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2049989351 countsByYear W20499893512014 @default.
• W2049989351 countsByYear W20499893512017 @default.
• W2049989351 countsByYear W20499893512021 @default.
• W2049989351 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2049989351 hasAuthorship W2049989351A5033131067 @default.
• W2049989351 hasAuthorship W2049989351A5045403266 @default.
• W2049989351 hasAuthorship W2049989351A5071123304 @default.
• W2049989351 hasAuthorship W2049989351A5075567914 @default.
• W2049989351 hasBestOaLocation W20499893513 @default.
• W2049989351 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2049989351 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2049989351 hasConceptScore W2049989351C29456083 @default.
• W2049989351 hasConceptScore W2049989351C71924100 @default.
• W2049989351 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2049989351 hasLocation W20499893511 @default.
• W2049989351 hasLocation W20499893512 @default.
• W2049989351 hasLocation W20499893513 @default.
• W2049989351 hasLocation W20499893514 @default.
• W2049989351 hasOpenAccess W2049989351 @default.
• W2049989351 hasPrimaryLocation W20499893511 @default.
• W2049989351 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2049989351 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2049989351 hasRelatedWork W1999344589 @default.

• next