FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2049989910> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2049989910 endingPage "758" @default.
• W2049989910 startingPage "753" @default.
• W2049989910 abstract "Study objective To compare home unattended polysomnography (H-PSG) with polysomnography performed in a local hospital and telemonitored by a sleep laboratory (T-PSG) in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Design Randomized crossover trial. Patients Ninety-nine patients with suspected OSAS who underwent H-PSG and T-PSG on 2 consecutive nights, according to a randomized order. Measurements H-PSG and T-PSG were compared in terms of (1) effectiveness, only recordings providing interpretable signals from at least one EEG, the electro-oculograph, the electromyograph, air flow, thoracic or abdominal movements, and arterial oxygen saturation for 180 min of sleep were considered to be effective; (2) patient preference assessed by a questionnaire; and (3) polysomnographic indexes and final interpretative results in patients for whom both recordings were legible. Results Recordings were considered to be ineffective in 11.2% of T-PSG (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9 to 17.4%) and in 23.4% of H-PSG (95% CI, 19.12 to 27.68%). Thermistor problems were the main cause of failure of H-PSG. Forty-one percent of patients preferred H-PSG, and 55% preferred T-PSG. H-PSG and T-PSG did not differ in terms of sleep and respiratory indexes in the 65 patients in whom both recordings were legible. H-PSG and T-PSG were concordant in 58 of 65 patients using a 10-event-per-hour apnea-hypopnea index cutoff value for the diagnosis of OSAS. Conclusions T-PSG is clearly superior to H-PSG from a technical point of view and tends to be preferred by patients. The site of recording (home vs hospital) has no influence on polysomnographic indexes. To compare home unattended polysomnography (H-PSG) with polysomnography performed in a local hospital and telemonitored by a sleep laboratory (T-PSG) in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Randomized crossover trial. Ninety-nine patients with suspected OSAS who underwent H-PSG and T-PSG on 2 consecutive nights, according to a randomized order. H-PSG and T-PSG were compared in terms of (1) effectiveness, only recordings providing interpretable signals from at least one EEG, the electro-oculograph, the electromyograph, air flow, thoracic or abdominal movements, and arterial oxygen saturation for 180 min of sleep were considered to be effective; (2) patient preference assessed by a questionnaire; and (3) polysomnographic indexes and final interpretative results in patients for whom both recordings were legible. Recordings were considered to be ineffective in 11.2% of T-PSG (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9 to 17.4%) and in 23.4% of H-PSG (95% CI, 19.12 to 27.68%). Thermistor problems were the main cause of failure of H-PSG. Forty-one percent of patients preferred H-PSG, and 55% preferred T-PSG. H-PSG and T-PSG did not differ in terms of sleep and respiratory indexes in the 65 patients in whom both recordings were legible. H-PSG and T-PSG were concordant in 58 of 65 patients using a 10-event-per-hour apnea-hypopnea index cutoff value for the diagnosis of OSAS. T-PSG is clearly superior to H-PSG from a technical point of view and tends to be preferred by patients. The site of recording (home vs hospital) has no influence on polysomnographic indexes." @default.
• W2049989910 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2049989910 creator A5003869640 @default.
• W2049989910 creator A5059129155 @default.
• W2049989910 creator A5072566142 @default.
• W2049989910 creator A5087550020 @default.
• W2049989910 creator A5091625201 @default.
• W2049989910 date "2002-03-01" @default.
• W2049989910 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2049989910 title "Home Unattended vs Hospital Telemonitored Polysomnography in Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome" @default.
• W2049989910 cites W119190672 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W186027583 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W187647308 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W194485135 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W1983451570 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W1989051576 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W1997672805 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2024885035 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2028177743 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W206912668 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2082533403 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2088507848 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2117075490 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2141517672 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2161959892 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2264784497 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W2333343699 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W4231539441 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W4254548085 @default.
• W2049989910 cites W80371536 @default.
• W2049989910 doi "https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.121.3.753" @default.
• W2049989910 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11888956" @default.
• W2049989910 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2049989910 type Work @default.
• W2049989910 sameAs 2049989910 @default.
• W2049989910 citedByCount "61" @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102012 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102013 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102014 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102015 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102016 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102017 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102018 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102019 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102021 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102022 @default.
• W2049989910 countsByYear W20499899102023 @default.
• W2049989910 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2049989910 hasAuthorship W2049989910A5003869640 @default.
• W2049989910 hasAuthorship W2049989910A5059129155 @default.
• W2049989910 hasAuthorship W2049989910A5072566142 @default.
• W2049989910 hasAuthorship W2049989910A5087550020 @default.
• W2049989910 hasAuthorship W2049989910A5091625201 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConcept C2776006263 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConcept C2777711342 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConcept C2778205975 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConcept C2781326671 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConceptScore W2049989910C126322002 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConceptScore W2049989910C2776006263 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConceptScore W2049989910C2777711342 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConceptScore W2049989910C2778205975 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConceptScore W2049989910C2781326671 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConceptScore W2049989910C42219234 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConceptScore W2049989910C44249647 @default.
• W2049989910 hasConceptScore W2049989910C71924100 @default.
• W2049989910 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2049989910 hasLocation W20499899101 @default.
• W2049989910 hasLocation W20499899102 @default.
• W2049989910 hasOpenAccess W2049989910 @default.
• W2049989910 hasPrimaryLocation W20499899101 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W2165614801 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W2352278907 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W2383496458 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W2385244159 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W2385652705 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W2389447091 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W2394005338 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W2605291975 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W3029809823 @default.
• W2049989910 hasRelatedWork W3213948420 @default.
• W2049989910 hasVolume "121" @default.
• W2049989910 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2049989910 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2049989910 magId "2049989910" @default.
• W2049989910 workType "article" @default.