FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2050608051> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2050608051 endingPage "417" @default.
• W2050608051 startingPage "412" @default.
• W2050608051 abstract "Statement of problem It is not clear how different glass ceramic surface pretreatments influence the bonding capacity of various luting agents to these surfaces. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of 3 resin cements to a lithia disilicate–based ceramic submitted to 2 surface conditioning treatments. Material and methods Eighteen 5 × 6 × 8-mm ceramic (IPS Empress 2) blocks were fabricated according to manufacturer's instructions and duplicated in composite resin (Tetric Ceram). Ceramic blocks were polished and divided into 2 groups (n=9/treatment): no conditioning (no-conditioning/control), or 5% hydrofluoric acid etching for 20 seconds and silanization for 1 minute (HF + SIL). Ceramic blocks were cemented to the composite resin blocks with 1 self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) or 1 of 2 resin-based luting agents (Multilink or Panavia F), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The composite resin–ceramic blocks were stored in humidity at 37°C for 7 days and serially sectioned to produce 25 beam specimens per group with a 1.0-mm2 cross-sectional area. Specimens were thermal cycled (5000 cycles, 5°C-55°C) and tested in tension at 1 mm/min. Microtensile bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons tests (α=.05). Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope (×40) and classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive. Results The surface conditioning factor was significant (HF+SIL > no-conditioning) (P<.0001). Considering the unconditioned groups, the μTBS of RelyX Unicem was significantly higher (9.6 ± 1.9) than that of Multilink (6.2 ± 1.2) and Panavia F (7.4 ± 1.9). Previous etching and silanization yielded statistically higher μTBS values for RelyX Unicem (18.8 ± 3.5) and Multilink (17.4 ± 3.0) when compared to Panavia F (15.7 ± 3.8). Spontaneous debonding after thermal cycling was detected when luting agents were applied to untreated ceramic surfaces. Conclusion Etching and silanization treatments appear to be crucial for resin bonding to a lithia disilicate–based ceramic, regardless of the resin cement used. It is not clear how different glass ceramic surface pretreatments influence the bonding capacity of various luting agents to these surfaces. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of 3 resin cements to a lithia disilicate–based ceramic submitted to 2 surface conditioning treatments. Eighteen 5 × 6 × 8-mm ceramic (IPS Empress 2) blocks were fabricated according to manufacturer's instructions and duplicated in composite resin (Tetric Ceram). Ceramic blocks were polished and divided into 2 groups (n=9/treatment): no conditioning (no-conditioning/control), or 5% hydrofluoric acid etching for 20 seconds and silanization for 1 minute (HF + SIL). Ceramic blocks were cemented to the composite resin blocks with 1 self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) or 1 of 2 resin-based luting agents (Multilink or Panavia F), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The composite resin–ceramic blocks were stored in humidity at 37°C for 7 days and serially sectioned to produce 25 beam specimens per group with a 1.0-mm2 cross-sectional area. Specimens were thermal cycled (5000 cycles, 5°C-55°C) and tested in tension at 1 mm/min. Microtensile bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons tests (α=.05). Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope (×40) and classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive. The surface conditioning factor was significant (HF+SIL > no-conditioning) (P<.0001). Considering the unconditioned groups, the μTBS of RelyX Unicem was significantly higher (9.6 ± 1.9) than that of Multilink (6.2 ± 1.2) and Panavia F (7.4 ± 1.9). Previous etching and silanization yielded statistically higher μTBS values for RelyX Unicem (18.8 ± 3.5) and Multilink (17.4 ± 3.0) when compared to Panavia F (15.7 ± 3.8). Spontaneous debonding after thermal cycling was detected when luting agents were applied to untreated ceramic surfaces. Etching and silanization treatments appear to be crucial for resin bonding to a lithia disilicate–based ceramic, regardless of the resin cement used." @default.
• W2050608051 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2050608051 creator A5007888063 @default.
• W2050608051 creator A5028278688 @default.
• W2050608051 creator A5036519120 @default.
• W2050608051 creator A5044414269 @default.
• W2050608051 creator A5046987090 @default.
• W2050608051 creator A5063299302 @default.
• W2050608051 creator A5074640440 @default.
• W2050608051 date "2006-12-01" @default.
• W2050608051 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2050608051 title "Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic" @default.
• W2050608051 cites W1905555226 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W1971077908 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2011528627 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2024104120 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2030404747 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2039563314 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2067120911 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2073622952 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2078128171 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2080642607 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2083035295 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2091663903 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2095732847 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2103003804 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2104224578 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2110736642 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2112733543 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2115285807 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2118049326 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2128551812 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2135596676 @default.
• W2050608051 cites W2136655589 @default.
• W2050608051 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.023" @default.
• W2050608051 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17174658" @default.
• W2050608051 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2050608051 type Work @default.
• W2050608051 sameAs 2050608051 @default.
• W2050608051 citedByCount "88" @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512012 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512013 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512014 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512015 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512016 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512017 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512018 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512019 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512020 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512021 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512022 @default.
• W2050608051 countsByYear W20506080512023 @default.
• W2050608051 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2050608051 hasAuthorship W2050608051A5007888063 @default.
• W2050608051 hasAuthorship W2050608051A5028278688 @default.
• W2050608051 hasAuthorship W2050608051A5036519120 @default.
• W2050608051 hasAuthorship W2050608051A5044414269 @default.
• W2050608051 hasAuthorship W2050608051A5046987090 @default.
• W2050608051 hasAuthorship W2050608051A5063299302 @default.
• W2050608051 hasAuthorship W2050608051A5074640440 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C140013486 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C159096172 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C2776276667 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C2778265030 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C2780151546 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C2781448156 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C523993062 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C104779481 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C112950240 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C134132462 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C140013486 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C159096172 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C159985019 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C180478085 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C192562407 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C2776276667 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C2778265030 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C2779227376 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C2780151546 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C2781448156 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C523993062 @default.
• W2050608051 hasConceptScore W2050608051C68928338 @default.
• W2050608051 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2050608051 hasLocation W20506080511 @default.
• W2050608051 hasLocation W20506080512 @default.
• W2050608051 hasOpenAccess W2050608051 @default.
• W2050608051 hasPrimaryLocation W20506080511 @default.
• W2050608051 hasRelatedWork W1761946077 @default.
• W2050608051 hasRelatedWork W2018149207 @default.
• W2050608051 hasRelatedWork W2210925959 @default.

• next