FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2050736275> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2050736275 endingPage "1227" @default.
• W2050736275 startingPage "1220" @default.
• W2050736275 abstract "To determine whether endoscopic clip-assisted nasoenteral feeding tube placement is more effective than standard feeding tube placement with transnasal endoscopy.Between August 2009 and February 2011, 143 patients referred for endoscopic nasoenteral feeding tube placement were randomized between clip-assisted and standard nasoenteral tube placement. Endoscopies were performed in the endoscopy unit and intensive care unit in a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. For the clip-assisted procedure, the feeding tube was introduced with a suture fixed to the tip, picked up in the stomach with an endoclip and attached (as distal as possible) to the duodenal wall. In the standard group, a guide wire was placed in the duodenum using a transnasal endoscope, followed by blind insertion of a feeding tube over the guide wire. Primary end point was a repeat endoscopy for incorrect tube placement or spontaneous retrograde tube migration. Secondary end points were incorrect tube placement, spontaneous migration of feeding tube, directs medical costs, and procedure-related (serious) adverse event (SAE).Of the 143 patients included, 71 were randomly assigned to clip-assisted tube placement, and 72 to standard tube placement. Four (5.6%) repeat endoscopies were performed in the clip-assisted group vs. 19 (26.4%) in the standard group (relative risk reduction (RRR) 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.92). The number needed to clip to avoid one repeat endoscopy was 4.8 (95% CI 3.1-11.3). Repeat endoscopies were mostly performed for incorrectly placed tubes, 3 (4.2%) in the clip-assisted group vs. 16 (22.2%, RRR 0.81; 95% CI 0.38-0.94) in the standard group. Spontaneous retrograde tube migration occurred in one (1.4%) clip-assisted placement and three (4.2%) standard tubes. Median costs were higher for clip-assisted tube placement (€519 vs. €423, P<0.01). Four (5.6%) SAEs occurred after clip-assisted feeding tube placement vs. one (1.4%) after standard feeding tube placement (P=0.21).Clip-assisted endoscopic nasoenteral feeding tube placement results in fewer repeat endoscopies than standard endoscopic nasoenteral tube placement, due to a higher success rate of initial placement. When tubes are adequately placed, retrograde tube migration rarely occurs." @default.
• W2050736275 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2050736275 creator A5001031394 @default.
• W2050736275 creator A5017105036 @default.
• W2050736275 creator A5025572750 @default.
• W2050736275 creator A5040458839 @default.
• W2050736275 creator A5041857317 @default.
• W2050736275 creator A5059451655 @default.
• W2050736275 creator A5061976835 @default.
• W2050736275 creator A5074268246 @default.
• W2050736275 date "2012-08-01" @default.
• W2050736275 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2050736275 title "Endoscopic Clip-Assisted Feeding Tube Placement Reduces Repeat Endoscopy Rate: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial" @default.
• W2050736275 cites W178155765 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W1972396537 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W1984743655 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W1985510007 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W1987761373 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W1991687551 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W1999160411 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2002761696 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2007806332 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2019153621 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2021564617 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2027549769 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2035761213 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2047444736 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2049496172 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2065400513 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2075983056 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2078815162 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2079648903 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2095241501 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2102760345 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2127781583 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2133968577 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2153647704 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2156744060 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2168444544 @default.
• W2050736275 cites W2315802956 @default.
• W2050736275 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.169" @default.
• W2050736275 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22751469" @default.
• W2050736275 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2050736275 type Work @default.
• W2050736275 sameAs 2050736275 @default.
• W2050736275 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752013 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752014 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752015 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752016 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752017 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752018 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752019 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752020 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752021 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752022 @default.
• W2050736275 countsByYear W20507362752023 @default.
• W2050736275 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2050736275 hasAuthorship W2050736275A5001031394 @default.
• W2050736275 hasAuthorship W2050736275A5017105036 @default.
• W2050736275 hasAuthorship W2050736275A5025572750 @default.
• W2050736275 hasAuthorship W2050736275A5040458839 @default.
• W2050736275 hasAuthorship W2050736275A5041857317 @default.
• W2050736275 hasAuthorship W2050736275A5059451655 @default.
• W2050736275 hasAuthorship W2050736275A5061976835 @default.
• W2050736275 hasAuthorship W2050736275A5074268246 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C2776820786 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C2777551473 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C2778045676 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C126322002 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C127413603 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C141071460 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C168563851 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C203092338 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C2776820786 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C2777551473 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C2778045676 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C2778451229 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C2778716859 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C44249647 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C71924100 @default.
• W2050736275 hasConceptScore W2050736275C78519656 @default.
• W2050736275 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2050736275 hasLocation W20507362751 @default.
• W2050736275 hasLocation W20507362752 @default.
• W2050736275 hasOpenAccess W2050736275 @default.
• W2050736275 hasPrimaryLocation W20507362751 @default.
• W2050736275 hasRelatedWork W1970063037 @default.

• next