FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2051154523> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2051154523 endingPage "786" @default.
• W2051154523 startingPage "781" @default.
• W2051154523 abstract "The significance of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 or 3 (CIN 2-3) at the margin of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimen as a predictor of recurrent or persistent disease is relatively controversial. Most studies have found the presence of high-grade dysplasia at the margins in this setting to be an adverse parameter. However, the significance of an isolated finding of CIN 1 at the surgical margins of LEEP specimens has not been rigorously studied. Herein, we evaluate the significance of finding CIN 1 at one or more margins of a LEEP specimen when these margins are negative for CIN 2-3. Consecutive LEEP specimens with a CIN 2-3 diagnosis (and whose margins were negative for the latter) were retrieved, and their slides were reviewed. The cases were classified as to whether CIN 1 was present at the margins. Follow-up cytologic and histologic data were compared between patients with and without CIN 1 at the margin. For patients with multiple follow-up samples, only the most severe abnormality (1 sample per patient) was counted. Seventy-three cases were evaluated, with CIN 1 present at the margin in 59 (81%, group 1) and absent in 14 (19%, group 2). Follow-up cytologic information was available in 60 patients, with a median follow-up of 19 months. The cytologic follow-up of groups 1 and 2 patients were not significantly different regarding the diagnostic frequency of any one of the Bethesda 2001 diagnostic categories (P > .05 for all, Fisher exact and χ2 tests). Of the 33 patients who received a cervical biopsy and/or endocervical curettage during the follow-up period, 29 belonged to group 1 and 4 to group 2. The distribution of “negative” CIN 1 and CIN 2-3 diagnoses for group 1 were 16 (55%) of 29, 7 (24%) of 29, and 6 (21%) of 29, respectively. Parallel figures for group 2 were 2 (50%) of 4, 2 (50%) of 4, and 0 (0%) of 4, respectively. Although CIN 2-3 was more frequent in group 1, none of the comparisons attained statistical significance. The current study is a small single-institution study, whose findings should not be extrapolated to cold-knife conizations, and need to be confirmed in larger data sets. However, our preliminary analysis suggests that the isolated presence of CIN 1 at the margin of a LEEP specimen, whose margins are otherwise negative, lacks adverse prognostic significance." @default.
• W2051154523 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2051154523 creator A5043669779 @default.
• W2051154523 creator A5056525972 @default.
• W2051154523 date "2007-05-01" @default.
• W2051154523 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2051154523 title "High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision" @default.
• W2051154523 cites W1973803676 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W1977558172 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W1979610459 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W1988803282 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W1998043583 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2004219546 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2004745857 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2006947068 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2010938569 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2014026714 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2024631433 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2026747526 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2027390624 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2029317188 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2031122869 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2031135517 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2033030969 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2034540196 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2036396516 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2052178689 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2064964133 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2076468675 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2083244459 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2085481899 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2138772335 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2158722556 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W2159111104 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W31670424 @default.
• W2051154523 cites W4249924703 @default.
• W2051154523 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2006.11.006" @default.
• W2051154523 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17316761" @default.
• W2051154523 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2051154523 type Work @default.
• W2051154523 sameAs 2051154523 @default.
• W2051154523 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2051154523 countsByYear W20511545232012 @default.
• W2051154523 countsByYear W20511545232013 @default.
• W2051154523 countsByYear W20511545232018 @default.
• W2051154523 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2051154523 hasAuthorship W2051154523A5043669779 @default.
• W2051154523 hasAuthorship W2051154523A5056525972 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C18823058 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2775894508 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2775924586 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2776117191 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2777343196 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2779534503 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C2909731388 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C63363279 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C65409693 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C121608353 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C126322002 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C141071460 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C142724271 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C18823058 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2775894508 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2775924586 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2776117191 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2776235491 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2777343196 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2778220009 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2779534503 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2781156865 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C2909731388 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C63363279 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C65409693 @default.
• W2051154523 hasConceptScore W2051154523C71924100 @default.
• W2051154523 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2051154523 hasLocation W20511545231 @default.
• W2051154523 hasLocation W20511545232 @default.
• W2051154523 hasOpenAccess W2051154523 @default.
• W2051154523 hasPrimaryLocation W20511545231 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W193088441 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2051154523 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2060886662 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2061265156 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2077236447 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2094105782 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2144555377 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2404961954 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2406299346 @default.
• W2051154523 hasRelatedWork W2571815623 @default.
• W2051154523 hasVolume "38" @default.

• next