FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2051210345> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2051210345 endingPage "325" @default.
• W2051210345 startingPage "303" @default.
• W2051210345 abstract "Purpose This paper aims to report a study of researchers' preferences in selecting information from cited papers to include in a literature review, and the kinds of transformations and editing applied to the selected information. Design/methodology/approach This is a part of a larger project to develop an automatic summarization method that emulates human literature review writing behaviour. Research questions were: how are literature reviews written – where do authors select information from, what types of information do they select and how do they transform it? What is the relationship between styles of literature review (integrative and descriptive) and each of these variables (source sections, types of information and types of transformation)? The authors analysed the literature review sections of 20 articles from the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 2001‐2008, to answer these questions. Referencing sentences were mapped to 279 source papers to determine the source sentences. The type of information selected, the sections of source papers where the information was taken from, and the types of editing changes made to include in the literature review were analyzed. Findings Integrative literature reviews contain more research result information and critique, and reference more information from the results and conclusion sections of the source papers. Descriptive literature reviews contain more research method information, and reference more information from the abstract and introduction sections. The most common kind of transformation is the high‐level summary, though descriptive literature reviews have more cut‐pasting, especially for information taken from the abstract. The types of editing – substitutions, insertions and deletions – applied to the source sentences are identified. Practical implications The results are useful in the teaching of literature review writing, and indicate ways for automatic summarization systems to emulate human literature review writing. Originality/value Though there have been several studies of abstracts and abstracting, there are few studies of literature reviews and literature review writing. Little is known about how writers select information from source papers, integrate it and present it in a literature review. This paper fills some of the gaps." @default.
• W2051210345 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2051210345 creator A5032220498 @default.
• W2051210345 creator A5075257716 @default.
• W2051210345 creator A5079154791 @default.
• W2051210345 date "2013-03-01" @default.
• W2051210345 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2051210345 title "Literature review writing: how information is selected and transformed" @default.
• W2051210345 cites W1602389404 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W1607769827 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W1768072090 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W1977895267 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W1980282589 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W1996489109 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2008155851 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2017440191 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2042852414 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2043403353 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2066972299 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2077840532 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2088802729 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2095929692 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2100122867 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2101390659 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2103045713 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2138119263 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2166347079 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2167304379 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2177923071 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2442495973 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W2520418100 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W4237523616 @default.
• W2051210345 cites W4251088421 @default.
• W2051210345 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531311330665" @default.
• W2051210345 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2051210345 type Work @default.
• W2051210345 sameAs 2051210345 @default.
• W2051210345 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452013 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452014 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452015 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452016 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452017 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452018 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452019 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452020 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452021 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452022 @default.
• W2051210345 countsByYear W20512103452023 @default.
• W2051210345 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2051210345 hasAuthorship W2051210345A5032220498 @default.
• W2051210345 hasAuthorship W2051210345A5075257716 @default.
• W2051210345 hasAuthorship W2051210345A5079154791 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C142546437 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C170858558 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C204241405 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C2778095710 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C104317684 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C105795698 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C142546437 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C144024400 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C170858558 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C185592680 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C204241405 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C23123220 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C2522767166 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C2778095710 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C33923547 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C36289849 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C41008148 @default.
• W2051210345 hasConceptScore W2051210345C55493867 @default.
• W2051210345 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2051210345 hasLocation W20512103451 @default.
• W2051210345 hasOpenAccess W2051210345 @default.
• W2051210345 hasPrimaryLocation W20512103451 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W132250100 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2093597205 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2285613413 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2351187795 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2380641910 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2389846579 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2392495745 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2561691764 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2589098947 @default.
• W2051210345 hasRelatedWork W2725657302 @default.
• W2051210345 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W2051210345 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2051210345 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next