Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2051277736> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2051277736 endingPage "588" @default.
- W2051277736 startingPage "581" @default.
- W2051277736 abstract "Objective The Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D) has been reported to be sensitive. The authors examined the reliability and validity of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the CSI-D for elderly patients. Methods Four groups were tested with the CSI-D: 31 with mild or moderate dementia; 32 non-dementia, depressed subjects; and 34 low-education, and 30 high-education normal-comparison subjects. Patients with dementia or depression were selected from outpatients of two hospitals. Testing was carried out in either the community or outpatient setting. Results The internal consistency, interrater reliability, and test–retest reliability of the CSI-D were good. The CSI-D was highly correlated with scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination and 10-word-list-learning task. Correlation with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was not significant. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis suggested that the CSI-D was a good instrument in differentiating dementia from depression and normal subjects with low education. It had good sensitivity and specificity. Education was related to the cognitive scores but not related to informant scores. The combination of an informant interview with a cognitive test enhanced the performance of the CSI-D. Conclusions The Taiwan Chinese version of the CSI-D is psychometrically sound, brief, easy to complete, and therefore suitable as a screening instrument for dementia in Taiwan. The study reinforces earlier suggestions that the informant interview yields improved validity for detecting dementia. The Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D) has been reported to be sensitive. The authors examined the reliability and validity of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the CSI-D for elderly patients. Four groups were tested with the CSI-D: 31 with mild or moderate dementia; 32 non-dementia, depressed subjects; and 34 low-education, and 30 high-education normal-comparison subjects. Patients with dementia or depression were selected from outpatients of two hospitals. Testing was carried out in either the community or outpatient setting. The internal consistency, interrater reliability, and test–retest reliability of the CSI-D were good. The CSI-D was highly correlated with scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination and 10-word-list-learning task. Correlation with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was not significant. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis suggested that the CSI-D was a good instrument in differentiating dementia from depression and normal subjects with low education. It had good sensitivity and specificity. Education was related to the cognitive scores but not related to informant scores. The combination of an informant interview with a cognitive test enhanced the performance of the CSI-D. The Taiwan Chinese version of the CSI-D is psychometrically sound, brief, easy to complete, and therefore suitable as a screening instrument for dementia in Taiwan. The study reinforces earlier suggestions that the informant interview yields improved validity for detecting dementia." @default.
- W2051277736 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2051277736 creator A5002149448 @default.
- W2051277736 creator A5004042454 @default.
- W2051277736 creator A5006997313 @default.
- W2051277736 creator A5051774516 @default.
- W2051277736 creator A5067018066 @default.
- W2051277736 creator A5072532121 @default.
- W2051277736 date "2005-07-01" @default.
- W2051277736 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2051277736 title "Validity and Reliability of a Taiwan Chinese Version of the Community Screening Instrument for Dementia" @default.
- W2051277736 cites W1496022702 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W1526974435 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W1847168837 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W1966963331 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W1971947637 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W1988879672 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W1991952617 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W1997829146 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2005463840 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2011602875 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2031047184 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W203397246 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2044885817 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2067278827 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2074203175 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2076091312 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2076184663 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2105954279 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2131823335 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2143987649 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2148574877 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2159011576 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2160819746 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2404502655 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W2418558004 @default.
- W2051277736 cites W39805860 @default.
- W2051277736 doi "https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.7.581" @default.
- W2051277736 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16009734" @default.
- W2051277736 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2051277736 type Work @default.
- W2051277736 sameAs 2051277736 @default.
- W2051277736 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W2051277736 countsByYear W20512777362013 @default.
- W2051277736 countsByYear W20512777362015 @default.
- W2051277736 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2051277736 hasAuthorship W2051277736A5002149448 @default.
- W2051277736 hasAuthorship W2051277736A5004042454 @default.
- W2051277736 hasAuthorship W2051277736A5006997313 @default.
- W2051277736 hasAuthorship W2051277736A5051774516 @default.
- W2051277736 hasAuthorship W2051277736A5067018066 @default.
- W2051277736 hasAuthorship W2051277736A5072532121 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C118552586 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C121332964 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C126322002 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C138496976 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C15744967 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C163258240 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C171606756 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C2779134260 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C2779483572 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C43214815 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C61863361 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C62520636 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C70410870 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C71924100 @default.
- W2051277736 hasConceptScore W2051277736C83849319 @default.
- W2051277736 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W2051277736 hasLocation W20512777361 @default.
- W2051277736 hasLocation W20512777362 @default.
- W2051277736 hasOpenAccess W2051277736 @default.
- W2051277736 hasPrimaryLocation W20512777361 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W1963946971 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W2077349269 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W2117118523 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W2161717149 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W2329288123 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W2471705044 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W2587182217 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W2773184377 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W4236592671 @default.
- W2051277736 hasRelatedWork W4244700416 @default.
- W2051277736 hasVolume "13" @default.