FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2051799897> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2051799897 endingPage "767" @default.
• W2051799897 startingPage "767" @default.
• W2051799897 abstract "Physiological, acoustic, and perceptual data indicate that the timing of events at the glottis relative to articulation differentiates homorganic stops in many languages. Such categories are variously described in terms of voicing, aspiration, and force of articulation. Chomsky & Halle 1968 have proposed a universal set of phonetic features, four of which-voice, tensity, glottal constriction, and heightened subglottal pressure-allegedly operate to control the onset timing of laryngeal pulsing. But the observational basis for their analysis is flimsy, and Chomsky & Halle have no substantive argument for rejecting the possibility of temporal control of laryngeal function. Until fairly recently the non-historical study of language was, at least in the United States, pretty much the province of two groups of people: the grammarians and the phoneticians. Each group paid little if any serious attention to the problems and findings of the other, even in the area of phonology, where their interests would seem to converge. In the case of the phoneticians, their ignorance of linguistics was not normally elevated to a matter of principle. Some grammarians, however, refused to consider phonetic research an integral part of linguistics. Such work was consigned to physiology and physics at the very time that the primacy of the spoken over the written forms of language was being asserted most emphatically.' The dichotomy drawn between langue and parole may have served as an excuse for minimizing the attention given to language in its most directly observable manifestation. Moreover, from the principle that only message-differentiating phonetic features are relevant to language description, linguists proceeded to the practice of knowing only as much about the processes of speech production and perception as sufficed to provide a set of labels by which to spell different messages distinctively.2 In the linguist's concern with the components of sentences and their arrangements, his primary interest may not be in 1 This point has been discussed at length, with reference to various linguists, by Haugne 1951. 2 Phoneticians, often enough scolded for doing research not immediately relatable to the linguist's own interests, have generally tried to remedy this situation; but sometimes this seems to take the form of renouncing research in any area not directly relevant to linguistics as most narrowly defined. Thus a phonetician with some training in linguistics can write, in connection with a study of mechanical pressures developed in the articulation of certain consonants, that 'the nasals are still another matter, as they do not enter into the lenis/fortis opposition, and calculating percentages of overlapping of their values with those of the stops would be meaningless' (Mal6cot 1966a:176). Phoneticians have failed to exploit research possibilities that closer attention to linguists' discussions would have made them aware of; but this does not imply that areas of phonetic research with which linguists have not concerned themselves are without relevance to linguistics. Recent discussion by Mattingly & Liberman 1969 suggests that linguists have been sometimes too ready to deny linguistic relevance to language and speech studies which threatened to yield findings not readily expressible in the current mode of linguistic description." @default.
• W2051799897 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2051799897 creator A5014440828 @default.
• W2051799897 creator A5055978107 @default.
• W2051799897 date "1971-12-01" @default.
• W2051799897 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2051799897 title "Distinctive Features and Laryngeal Control" @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1525314354 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1545150940 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1596025736 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1598851216 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1673696863 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1891338529 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1898140825 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1965340517 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1965804382 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1979722834 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W1998624223 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2012426103 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2016606859 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2032946958 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2038873700 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2051626546 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2051761054 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2051814828 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2053811032 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2062864280 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2070575640 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2081234301 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2088976916 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2095085111 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2187702043 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2188597981 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2276049795 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2315628601 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W2401291327 @default.
• W2051799897 cites W91681889 @default.
• W2051799897 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/412155" @default.
• W2051799897 hasPublicationYear "1971" @default.
• W2051799897 type Work @default.
• W2051799897 sameAs 2051799897 @default.
• W2051799897 citedByCount "102" @default.
• W2051799897 countsByYear W20517998972013 @default.
• W2051799897 countsByYear W20517998972014 @default.
• W2051799897 countsByYear W20517998972015 @default.
• W2051799897 countsByYear W20517998972016 @default.
• W2051799897 countsByYear W20517998972017 @default.
• W2051799897 countsByYear W20517998972018 @default.
• W2051799897 countsByYear W20517998972019 @default.
• W2051799897 countsByYear W20517998972023 @default.
• W2051799897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2051799897 hasAuthorship W2051799897A5014440828 @default.
• W2051799897 hasAuthorship W2051799897A5055978107 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConceptScore W2051799897C138885662 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConceptScore W2051799897C154945302 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConceptScore W2051799897C15744967 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConceptScore W2051799897C2775924081 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConceptScore W2051799897C41008148 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConceptScore W2051799897C41895202 @default.
• W2051799897 hasConceptScore W2051799897C46312422 @default.
• W2051799897 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2051799897 hasLocation W20517998971 @default.
• W2051799897 hasOpenAccess W2051799897 @default.
• W2051799897 hasPrimaryLocation W20517998971 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W1968338851 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W21089823 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2051799897 hasRelatedWork W2913276869 @default.
• W2051799897 hasVolume "47" @default.
• W2051799897 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2051799897 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2051799897 magId "2051799897" @default.
• W2051799897 workType "article" @default.