FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2052056592> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2052056592 endingPage "260" @default.
• W2052056592 startingPage "260" @default.
• W2052056592 abstract "Background: Medical educators recognize grade inflation as a significant problem with multi-factorial etiologies beginning as early as junior medical student clerkship rotations. Colletti et al reported faculty educators’ inability or unwillingness to provide medical student trainees with unfavorable face-to-face evaluations as a source of grade inflation. The effects of un-countered grade inflation are significant, rendering academic deans and advisors less able to provide useful comparative evaluations and recommendations for matriculating students, and in one study (Speer et al), leaving nearly half of the faculty in an internal medicine clerkship concerned about “social-promotion” of failing students due to uncontrolled grade inflation. Little literature specifically addresses techniques to minimize grade inflation. Methods: Using our previously reported 360-degree web-based competency evaluation tool for 3rd year medical student clerkships, evaluation data were collected assessing nine evaluation items based upon the six ACGME “core competencies”. During part one of the study, evaluations were completed with faculty evaluators blinded to their averaged evaluation data. During part two of the study, real-time faculty mean and standard error evaluation data were prominently displayed on the evaluation instrument during faculty evaluations. We hypothesized that passive faculty notification of evaluation data would alter evaluations toward a more centrist mean, based upon changes in clinician ordering patterns observed when cost data were displayed. Results: Prior to and during Part One of the study, mean evaluation scores were significantly greater than the anticipated mean (2.5) for all items evaluated. 2043 individual evaluation scores were acquired, equally allocated between pre- and post-notification periods of the study. Mean evaluation scores were significantly greater than the anticipated mean (2.5) for all items evaluated. Data were evaluated using parametric (t-test) and nonparametric (Wilcoxon signed ranks test) statistical analyses comparing blinded and passive faculty notification evaluation data. Mean evaluation scores were noted to increase slightly for each of the nine evaluation items after commencement of passive notification, with one item achieving and three items approaching statistical significance. Conclusions: These findings appear to contradict our hypothesis that passive notification of faculty evaluation averages decrease evaluation means or improve grade inflation. Increasingly large datasets, obtained using on-line evaluation tools, will likely achieve statistical significance demonstrating that faculty should not be shown real-time grade averages during evaluation. We believe that these data support the need to develop alternate methods of managing grade inflation, including faculty education or parametric grade re-calculation as tools to counter grade inflation." @default.
• W2052056592 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2052056592 creator A5070983498 @default.
• W2052056592 date "2003-10-01" @default.
• W2052056592 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2052056592 title "Displaying faculty grade averages during 3 rd year medical student clerkship evaluations: effects upon grade inflation" @default.
• W2052056592 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2003.08.193" @default.
• W2052056592 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2052056592 type Work @default.
• W2052056592 sameAs 2052056592 @default.
• W2052056592 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2052056592 countsByYear W20520565922013 @default.
• W2052056592 countsByYear W20520565922014 @default.
• W2052056592 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2052056592 hasAuthorship W2052056592A5070983498 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C22156102 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C2781463719 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C120912362 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C15744967 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C17744445 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C19417346 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C199539241 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C22156102 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C2781463719 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C47177190 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C509550671 @default.
• W2052056592 hasConceptScore W2052056592C71924100 @default.
• W2052056592 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2052056592 hasLocation W20520565921 @default.
• W2052056592 hasOpenAccess W2052056592 @default.
• W2052056592 hasPrimaryLocation W20520565921 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W1968364143 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W1980606884 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W220972406 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W252080413 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W2727908556 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W3123081737 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W61284793 @default.
• W2052056592 hasRelatedWork W174557014 @default.
• W2052056592 hasVolume "114" @default.
• W2052056592 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2052056592 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2052056592 magId "2052056592" @default.
• W2052056592 workType "article" @default.