FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2052115463> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2052115463 endingPage "30" @default.
• W2052115463 startingPage "225" @default.
• W2052115463 abstract "Computerized heart allograft recipient monitoring (CHARM) is a unique concept of patient surveillance after heart transplantation (HTx), based on the evaluation of intramyocardial electrograms (IEGMs) recorded non-invasively with telemetric pacemakers. Previous open, single-center studies had indicated a high correlation between CHARM results and clinical findings. The present study was initiated to assess the suitability of CHARM for monitoring the absence of rejection in a blind, multicenter context. During the HTx procedure, telemetric pacemakers and two epimyocardial leads were implanted in 44 patients at four European HTx centers. IEGMs during pacing were recorded and transferred via the Internet to the CHARM computer center, for automatic data processing and extraction of diagnostically relevant information, i.e., the maximum slew rate of the descending part of the repolarization phase of the ventricular evoked response (VER T-slew). The study period comprised the first 6 months after HTx, during which the transplant centers were blind to the CHARM results. A single threshold diagnosis model was prospectively defined to assess the ability of the VER T-slew to indicate clinically significant rejection, which was defined as an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) grade greater than or equal to 2, according to the grading system of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All EMB slides from three centers were reviewed blind by the pathologist of the fourth center in order that agreement among the histological diagnoses at the various centers could be assessed. Totals of 839 follow-ups and 366 EMBs were obtained in 44 patients. Thirty-seven patients were alive at the end of the study period. Age at HTx, EMB grade distribution, and rejection prevalence varied significantly between the centers. Review of the EMB results showed considerable differences with respect to classification of significant rejection. Comparison of average VER T-slew values with and without rejection in the 15 patients who exhibited both states revealed significantly lower values under the influence of rejection (97+/-13% vs 79+/-15%, P<0.0001). Twenty out of the 25 cases with significant rejection were correctly identified by VER T-slew values below a threshold of 98% (sensitivity =80%, specificity =50%, negative predictive value =97%, positive predictive value =11%; P<0.0005). Of the EMBs, 48% could have been saved if the diagnosis model had been used to indicate the need for EMB. A high negative predictive value for the detection of cases with significant rejection has been obtained in a prospective, blind, multicenter study. The presented method can, therefore, be used to supplement patient monitoring after HTx non-invasively, in particular to indicate the need for EMBs. In centers with patient management similar to the ones who participated in the study, this may allow a reduction in the number of surveillance EMBs." @default.
• W2052115463 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5013078155 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5013160038 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5030065536 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5033263383 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5036019773 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5036203401 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5044582880 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5045768339 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5050797730 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5063295298 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5063871294 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5065436059 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5066157660 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5068820873 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5078829427 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5082983531 @default.
• W2052115463 creator A5090820164 @default.
• W2052115463 date "2003-04-01" @default.
• W2052115463 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2052115463 title "Computerized heart allograft-recipient monitoring: a multicenter study." @default.
• W2052115463 cites W103048511 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W1980330879 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2048586783 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2053882076 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2070520520 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2071184204 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2071317733 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2078141584 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2099816959 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2106202732 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2123106654 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2223214578 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2314348180 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2409310910 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2415627920 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2417956360 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2432539217 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W2436377048 @default.
• W2052115463 cites W3153242095 @default.
• W2052115463 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00147-002-0530-x" @default.
• W2052115463 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12730802" @default.
• W2052115463 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2052115463 type Work @default.
• W2052115463 sameAs 2052115463 @default.
• W2052115463 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2052115463 countsByYear W20521154632012 @default.
• W2052115463 countsByYear W20521154632020 @default.
• W2052115463 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5013078155 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5013160038 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5030065536 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5033263383 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5036019773 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5036203401 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5044582880 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5045768339 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5050797730 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5063295298 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5063871294 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5065436059 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5066157660 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5068820873 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5078829427 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5082983531 @default.
• W2052115463 hasAuthorship W2052115463A5090820164 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C2778849806 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C2780073493 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C126322002 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C141071460 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C151730666 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C164705383 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C2778198053 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C2778849806 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C2779343474 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C2780073493 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C2911091166 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C71924100 @default.
• W2052115463 hasConceptScore W2052115463C86803240 @default.
• W2052115463 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2052115463 hasLocation W20521154631 @default.
• W2052115463 hasOpenAccess W2052115463 @default.
• W2052115463 hasPrimaryLocation W20521154631 @default.
• W2052115463 hasRelatedWork W1972656835 @default.
• W2052115463 hasRelatedWork W2003158566 @default.
• W2052115463 hasRelatedWork W2051712573 @default.
• W2052115463 hasRelatedWork W2061508526 @default.
• W2052115463 hasRelatedWork W2107400784 @default.

• next