Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2052116760> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2052116760 endingPage "853" @default.
- W2052116760 startingPage "842" @default.
- W2052116760 abstract "Background Reliable, serial, noninvasive quantitative estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction is essential for selecting and timing therapeutic interventions in patients with heart disease. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography is widely used for this purpose but has well-recognized limitations. Advantages of echocardiography over equilibrium radionuclide angiography include assessment of wall motion, valvular pathology, and cardiac hemodynamics, in addition to portability, lack of radiation exposure, and substantially lower cost. However, conventional echocardiographic techniques are limited by geometric assumptions, image positioning errors, and use of subjective visual methods. To overcome these limitations, a three-dimensional echocardiographic method was developed. This study compares ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography, quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography, and subjective two-dimensional echocardiographic visual estimation with that by equilibrium radionuclide angiography. Methods and Results Fifty-one unselected patients with suspected heart disease underwent left ventricular ejection fraction determination by equilibrium radionuclide angiography and three-dimensional echocardiography using an interactive line-of-intersection display and a new algorithm, ventricular surface reconstruction, for volume computation. In 44 patients, ejection fractions were also estimated visually by experienced observers from two-dimensional echocardiography and by quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography using an apical biplane summation-of-disks algorithm. An excellent correlation was obtained between three-dimensional echocardiography and equilibrium radionuclide angiography ( r =.94 to .97, SEE=3.64% to 5.35%; limits of agreement, 10.3% to 13.3%) without significant underestimation or overestimation. SEE values and limits of agreement were twofold to threefold lower than corresponding values for all two-dimensional echocardiographic techniques. In addition, interobserver variability was significantly lower for the three-dimensional echocardiographic method (10.2%) than for the apical biplane summation-of-disks method (26.1%) and subjective visual estimation (33.3%). Conclusions Determination of ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography yields results comparable to those obtained by equilibrium radionuclide angiography and is substantially superior to all two-dimensional echocardiographic methods. Therefore, three-dimensional echocardiography may be used for accurate serial quantification of left ventricular function as an alternative to equilibrium radionuclide angiography." @default.
- W2052116760 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5006357621 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5020916876 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5044369021 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5057728240 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5060583238 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5073004665 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5077720810 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5078257748 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5078733188 @default.
- W2052116760 creator A5079635502 @default.
- W2052116760 date "1995-08-15" @default.
- W2052116760 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2052116760 title "Assessment of Cardiac Function by Three-dimensional Echocardiography Compared With Conventional Noninvasive Methods" @default.
- W2052116760 cites W196421543 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W1964997635 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W1969488920 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W1969972218 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W1970818178 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W1980950958 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W1989336948 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W1991513788 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W1992057864 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2002686437 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2013233457 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2021989197 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2024056508 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2027481231 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2031155857 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2033292054 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2035064943 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2042709935 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2042735558 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2051987812 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2064291132 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2089407491 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2092968076 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2133750711 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2133788514 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2139433831 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2165361618 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2267711384 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W2336435843 @default.
- W2052116760 cites W277735589 @default.
- W2052116760 doi "https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.4.842" @default.
- W2052116760 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7641365" @default.
- W2052116760 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
- W2052116760 type Work @default.
- W2052116760 sameAs 2052116760 @default.
- W2052116760 citedByCount "194" @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602012 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602013 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602014 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602015 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602016 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602017 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602018 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602019 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602020 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602021 @default.
- W2052116760 countsByYear W20521167602023 @default.
- W2052116760 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5006357621 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5020916876 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5044369021 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5057728240 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5060583238 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5073004665 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5077720810 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5078257748 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5078733188 @default.
- W2052116760 hasAuthorship W2052116760A5079635502 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C2780088680 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C78085059 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C80461066 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConcept C91158637 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C126322002 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C126838900 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C127413603 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C146978453 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C164705383 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C2778198053 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C2780088680 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C2780643987 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C2989005 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C71924100 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C78085059 @default.
- W2052116760 hasConceptScore W2052116760C80461066 @default.