FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2052133095> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2052133095 endingPage "218" @default.
• W2052133095 startingPage "213" @default.
• W2052133095 abstract "Background Colonoscopy preparation regimens are poorly tolerated, requiring the use of a large volume of an unpalatable solution and diet restriction for adequate cleansing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two regimens of bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a whole dose of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E), with diet restriction vs. a split dose with no diet restriction. Methods A total of 141 patients (ages 20-84 years, 81 men) were randomly assigned to receive either 4 L PEG-E, along with a liquid diet the day before colonoscopy (Group A) or 2 L PEG-E with a regular diet the day before colonoscopy followed by another 2 L PEG-E on the day of the procedure (Group B). The quality of the preparation was graded by the endoscopist (poor to excellent), who was blinded to the type of preparation. Tolerability of the assigned preparation and adverse effects were recorded by an independent investigator by using a questionnaire administered before colonoscopy. Intra- and interobserver variability was studied by using randomly chosen videotapes of colonoscopies performed as part of the study. Results There were 73 patients in Group A and 68 patients in Group B. The quality of the preparation was significantly better in Group B (p = 0.011). The tolerability of the preparation regimen was not different overall between study groups in terms of side effects (except for bloating, which was more frequent in Group B, p = 0.039) or willingness to repeat the preparation. There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved adherence to the assigned preparation in favor of Group B (p = 0.062). Inter- and intraobserver variability analysis showed good to excellent correlation among endoscopists. Conclusions Colonic preparation with split-dose PEG-E and no dietary restriction provides better quality colon cleansing than whole-dose preparation, with no significant impact on patient tolerability and side effects. Colonoscopy preparation regimens are poorly tolerated, requiring the use of a large volume of an unpalatable solution and diet restriction for adequate cleansing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two regimens of bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a whole dose of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E), with diet restriction vs. a split dose with no diet restriction. A total of 141 patients (ages 20-84 years, 81 men) were randomly assigned to receive either 4 L PEG-E, along with a liquid diet the day before colonoscopy (Group A) or 2 L PEG-E with a regular diet the day before colonoscopy followed by another 2 L PEG-E on the day of the procedure (Group B). The quality of the preparation was graded by the endoscopist (poor to excellent), who was blinded to the type of preparation. Tolerability of the assigned preparation and adverse effects were recorded by an independent investigator by using a questionnaire administered before colonoscopy. Intra- and interobserver variability was studied by using randomly chosen videotapes of colonoscopies performed as part of the study. There were 73 patients in Group A and 68 patients in Group B. The quality of the preparation was significantly better in Group B (p = 0.011). The tolerability of the preparation regimen was not different overall between study groups in terms of side effects (except for bloating, which was more frequent in Group B, p = 0.039) or willingness to repeat the preparation. There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved adherence to the assigned preparation in favor of Group B (p = 0.062). Inter- and intraobserver variability analysis showed good to excellent correlation among endoscopists. Colonic preparation with split-dose PEG-E and no dietary restriction provides better quality colon cleansing than whole-dose preparation, with no significant impact on patient tolerability and side effects." @default.
• W2052133095 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2052133095 creator A5006198615 @default.
• W2052133095 creator A5027266583 @default.
• W2052133095 creator A5031571270 @default.
• W2052133095 creator A5038943632 @default.
• W2052133095 creator A5045626036 @default.
• W2052133095 creator A5067183515 @default.
• W2052133095 creator A5080036501 @default.
• W2052133095 creator A5080242833 @default.
• W2052133095 date "2005-08-01" @default.
• W2052133095 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2052133095 title "A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation" @default.
• W2052133095 cites W1645633844 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W1974026571 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W1981998005 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W1986080789 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W1992563691 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W1997886109 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2008212582 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2027352476 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2032665282 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2044526751 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2044640409 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2047226612 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2057612174 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2062851333 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2070594057 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2075489762 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2089133515 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2095830244 @default.
• W2052133095 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2052133095 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00371-8" @default.
• W2052133095 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16046981" @default.
• W2052133095 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2052133095 type Work @default.
• W2052133095 sameAs 2052133095 @default.
• W2052133095 citedByCount "203" @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952012 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952013 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952014 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952015 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952016 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952017 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952018 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952019 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952020 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952021 @default.
• W2052133095 countsByYear W20521330952022 @default.
• W2052133095 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2052133095 hasAuthorship W2052133095A5006198615 @default.
• W2052133095 hasAuthorship W2052133095A5027266583 @default.
• W2052133095 hasAuthorship W2052133095A5031571270 @default.
• W2052133095 hasAuthorship W2052133095A5038943632 @default.
• W2052133095 hasAuthorship W2052133095A5045626036 @default.
• W2052133095 hasAuthorship W2052133095A5067183515 @default.
• W2052133095 hasAuthorship W2052133095A5080036501 @default.
• W2052133095 hasAuthorship W2052133095A5080242833 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C2776956441 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C2776964284 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C2777785397 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C2778375690 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C2780580376 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C2781413609 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C3019222653 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C42360764 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C54400483 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C10138342 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C121608353 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C126322002 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C127413603 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C141071460 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C162324750 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C168563851 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C197934379 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C2776956441 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C2776964284 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C2777785397 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C2778375690 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C2778435480 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C2780580376 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C2781413609 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C3019222653 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C42360764 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C526805850 @default.
• W2052133095 hasConceptScore W2052133095C54400483 @default.

• next