FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2052524297> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2052524297 endingPage "562" @default.
• W2052524297 startingPage "556" @default.
• W2052524297 abstract "In osteoporosis research, bone histomorphometry plays an important role in documenting the biological effects and possible side-effects of new drug treatments. To ensure that the study is properly scaled, it is important to be concerned with the risk of type II error; that is, the risk of failing to detect a real difference. We therefore calculated the necessary sample size in bone histomorphometric studies according to a specified difference of 15% between two groups. The calculations were based on variance components estimated from three different studies: women with a distal fracture of the forearm (n = 22); patients with pituitary insufficiency (n = 21); and patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (n = 21). Using a significance level of 0.05 and a risk of type II error of 0.20, the statistical power of two different designs was compared: a single biopsy design comparing the responses in two groups after the treatment; and a paired biopsy design in which individual differences (posttreatment minus baseline) were calculated before the comparison of the two groups. We found that the mineral apposition rate, wall thickness, and erosion depth are statistically powerful indices that, in the single biopsy design, require no more than n = 25 in each group to detect differences of 15% between the groups. Bone volume, erosion surface, osteoid surface, mineralizing surface, and activation frequency need group sizes of 100-600 individuals to find a 15% difference to be statistically significant. However, the effect of bisphosphonate treatment, for instance, is large enough to reduce the group size to 20 individuals concerning activation frequency. The remodeling balance reaches extreme group sizes of several thousand for a 15% difference to be statistically significant, but for a 5 microm (approximately 150%) improvement, about 100 individuals are required in the single biopsy design. An analysis of the components of variance showed that the variation between individuals is small and often negligible compared with the variation within individuals, and sample sizes needed for the paired biopsy design are therefore larger than those for the single biopsy design. In conclusion, the most cost-effective histomorphometric study design within a randomized clinical trial appears to be a single biopsy design comparing posttreatment biopsies with scaling performed according to the statistical power of the indices of interest." @default.
• W2052524297 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2052524297 creator A5024661212 @default.
• W2052524297 creator A5083882610 @default.
• W2052524297 creator A5088619095 @default.
• W2052524297 creator A5090837888 @default.
• W2052524297 date "2001-05-01" @default.
• W2052524297 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2052524297 title "How many patients are needed? Variation and design considerations in bone histomorphometry" @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1965624344 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1968253229 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1968418396 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1978813848 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1983606468 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1984592620 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1992234607 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1995999743 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W1998456522 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2001271269 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2006021879 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2012712753 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2015944551 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2018403625 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2020490060 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2023640846 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2023781848 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2025733870 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2029190152 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2045259447 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2048568696 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2050513593 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2057536440 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2062661157 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2070462923 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2087378917 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2088630696 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2090030634 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2091737798 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2107384726 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2114150652 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2120293563 @default.
• W2052524297 cites W2159837057 @default.
• W2052524297 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00424-0" @default.
• W2052524297 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11344056" @default.
• W2052524297 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2052524297 type Work @default.
• W2052524297 sameAs 2052524297 @default.
• W2052524297 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2052524297 countsByYear W20525242972012 @default.
• W2052524297 countsByYear W20525242972018 @default.
• W2052524297 countsByYear W20525242972021 @default.
• W2052524297 countsByYear W20525242972022 @default.
• W2052524297 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2052524297 hasAuthorship W2052524297A5024661212 @default.
• W2052524297 hasAuthorship W2052524297A5083882610 @default.
• W2052524297 hasAuthorship W2052524297A5088619095 @default.
• W2052524297 hasAuthorship W2052524297A5090837888 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C117866178 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C2779079599 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C2909674915 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C3018268312 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C65409693 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C81880429 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C105795698 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C117866178 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C126322002 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C126894567 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C129848803 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C141071460 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C199343813 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C2775934546 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C2776541429 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C2779079599 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C2909674915 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C3018268312 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C33923547 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C65409693 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C71924100 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C81880429 @default.
• W2052524297 hasConceptScore W2052524297C99476002 @default.
• W2052524297 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2052524297 hasLocation W20525242971 @default.
• W2052524297 hasLocation W20525242972 @default.
• W2052524297 hasOpenAccess W2052524297 @default.
• W2052524297 hasPrimaryLocation W20525242971 @default.
• W2052524297 hasRelatedWork W1971277307 @default.
• W2052524297 hasRelatedWork W1987455986 @default.

• next