FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2052542166> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2052542166 abstract "Abstract Background The most commonly used survey methods are self-administered questionnaires, telephone interviews, and a mixture of both. But until now evidence out of randomised controlled trials as to whether patient responses differ depending on the survey mode is lacking. Therefore this study assessed whether patient responses to surveys depend on the mode of survey administration. The comparison was between mailed, self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews. Methods A four-armed, randomised controlled two-period change-over design. Each patient responded to the same survey twice, once in written form and once by telephone interview, separated by at least a fortnight. The study was conducted in 2003/2004 in Germany. 1087 patients taking part in the German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC cohort study), who agreed to participate in a survey after completing acupuncture treatment from an acupuncture-certified family physician for headache, were randomised. Of these, 823 (664 women) from the ages of 18 to 83 (mean 51.7) completed both parts of the study. The main outcome measure was the comparison of the scores on the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) questionnaire for the two survey modes. Results Computer-aided telephone interviews (CATI) resulted in significantly fewer missing data (0.5%) than did mailed questionnaires (2.8%; p < 0.001). The analysis of equivalence revealed a difference between the survey modes only for the SF-12 mental scales. On average, reported mental status score was 3.5 score points (2.9 to 4.0) lower on the self-administered questionnaire compared to the telephone interview. The order of administration affected results. Patients who responded to the telephone interview first reported better mental health in the subsequent paper questionnaire (mean difference 2.8 score points) compared to those who responded to the paper questionnaire first (mean difference 4.1 score points). Conclusion Despite the comparatively high cost of telephone interviews, they offer clear advantages over mailed self-administered questionnaires as regards completeness of data. Only items concerning mental status were dependent on the survey mode and sequence of administration. Items on physical status were not affected. Normative data for standardized telephone questionnaires could contribute to a better comparability with the results of the corresponding standardized paper questionnaires." @default.
• W2052542166 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2052542166 creator A5002977923 @default.
• W2052542166 creator A5018382134 @default.
• W2052542166 creator A5025132481 @default.
• W2052542166 creator A5033119172 @default.
• W2052542166 creator A5047756678 @default.
• W2052542166 creator A5091566056 @default.
• W2052542166 date "2007-11-22" @default.
• W2052542166 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2052542166 title "Randomised controlled comparison of the Health Survey Short Form (SF-12) and the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) in telephone interviews versus self-administered questionnaires. Are the results equivalent?" @default.
• W2052542166 cites W1596599446 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W1966128258 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W1989738092 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W1999963259 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2024940361 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2032591439 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2050016216 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2070526061 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2093689885 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2095364883 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2120724038 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2127283495 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2137667475 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2144882865 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2149725095 @default.
• W2052542166 cites W2172151487 @default.
• W2052542166 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-50" @default.
• W2052542166 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2216025" @default.
• W2052542166 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18034900" @default.
• W2052542166 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2052542166 type Work @default.
• W2052542166 sameAs 2052542166 @default.
• W2052542166 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662012 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662013 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662014 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662015 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662016 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662017 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662019 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662020 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662021 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662022 @default.
• W2052542166 countsByYear W20525421662023 @default.
• W2052542166 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2052542166 hasAuthorship W2052542166A5002977923 @default.
• W2052542166 hasAuthorship W2052542166A5018382134 @default.
• W2052542166 hasAuthorship W2052542166A5025132481 @default.
• W2052542166 hasAuthorship W2052542166A5033119172 @default.
• W2052542166 hasAuthorship W2052542166A5047756678 @default.
• W2052542166 hasAuthorship W2052542166A5091566056 @default.
• W2052542166 hasBestOaLocation W20525421661 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C2778834376 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C56837625 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C141071460 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C142724271 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C144024400 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C168563851 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C1862650 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C204787440 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C2778834376 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C36289849 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C512399662 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C56837625 @default.
• W2052542166 hasConceptScore W2052542166C71924100 @default.
• W2052542166 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2052542166 hasLocation W20525421661 @default.
• W2052542166 hasLocation W20525421662 @default.
• W2052542166 hasLocation W20525421663 @default.
• W2052542166 hasLocation W20525421664 @default.
• W2052542166 hasOpenAccess W2052542166 @default.
• W2052542166 hasPrimaryLocation W20525421661 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W1520661377 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W1992163940 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W2087663221 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W2141671059 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W2147149984 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W2566889147 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W2591952757 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W2776759876 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W4247177169 @default.
• W2052542166 hasRelatedWork W4366603008 @default.
• W2052542166 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W2052542166 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2052542166 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2052542166 magId "2052542166" @default.
• W2052542166 workType "article" @default.