FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2053388970> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2053388970 endingPage "1636" @default.
• W2053388970 startingPage "1633" @default.
• W2053388970 abstract "Background The contraceptive implant Norplant (levonorgestrel) had a fairly short life in the UK. This mode it a convenient subject for a case study of how media coverage alters over time. We set out to produce a critical description of national newspaper coverage of Norplant over the course of its use in the UK. Methods We searched newspaper databases and pressclippings files for articles about Norplant printed between 1992 and 1996. For those that met our inclusion criteria, we extracted bibliographical data, made a standardised judgment about the “slant” of the article towards Norplant, and used qualitative techniques to analyse the content of the articles. Findings 101 national newspaper articles were included in the study. Norplant attracted media coverage over the course of its career, but the slant of articles shifted dramatically over time from a favourable to a negative presentation. This reflected the use of different story types over the course of time. Early reports presented Norplant very positively as either a clear improvement on existing contraceptive methods or a valuable addition to the range. Any disadvantages were down-played. The positive image of Norplant was reinforced immediately after its official launch by reports that it was in great demand but women might be denied access to it. Less than a year later, however, newspaper reports about Norplant were dominated by the stories of individual women who had had bad experiences with the product. Interpretation Three main reporting themes were seen. At first, Norplant was presented as a positive new development, and one that might be denied to people. In later coverage it became a flawed and damaging product. These themes recur in media reporting of health technologies, and the fact that they occur at different stages in a product's career means that a balanced assessment of the technology is not usually feasible from media reporting at any one time. An appreciation of the forms and implications of these reporting frameworks could help health-care providers and users to appraise media reports more critically." @default.
• W2053388970 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2053388970 creator A5005612555 @default.
• W2053388970 creator A5032281765 @default.
• W2053388970 creator A5050756140 @default.
• W2053388970 date "2000-05-01" @default.
• W2053388970 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2053388970 title "The case of Norplant as an example of media coverage over the life of a new health technology" @default.
• W2053388970 cites W1456624770 @default.
• W2053388970 cites W2037003165 @default.
• W2053388970 cites W2047157082 @default.
• W2053388970 cites W2049096118 @default.
• W2053388970 cites W2077580321 @default.
• W2053388970 cites W4247220477 @default.
• W2053388970 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02226-1" @default.
• W2053388970 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10821380" @default.
• W2053388970 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2053388970 type Work @default.
• W2053388970 sameAs 2053388970 @default.
• W2053388970 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2053388970 countsByYear W20533889702013 @default.
• W2053388970 countsByYear W20533889702014 @default.
• W2053388970 countsByYear W20533889702015 @default.
• W2053388970 countsByYear W20533889702020 @default.
• W2053388970 countsByYear W20533889702021 @default.
• W2053388970 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2053388970 hasAuthorship W2053388970A5005612555 @default.
• W2053388970 hasAuthorship W2053388970A5032281765 @default.
• W2053388970 hasAuthorship W2053388970A5050756140 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C160050368 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C201280247 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C2780186607 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C112698675 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C144133560 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C160050368 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C201280247 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C2779076696 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C2780186607 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C2908647359 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C29456083 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C2986817661 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C512399662 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C71924100 @default.
• W2053388970 hasConceptScore W2053388970C99454951 @default.
• W2053388970 hasIssue "9215" @default.
• W2053388970 hasLocation W20533889701 @default.
• W2053388970 hasLocation W20533889702 @default.
• W2053388970 hasOpenAccess W2053388970 @default.
• W2053388970 hasPrimaryLocation W20533889701 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W1994411548 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2037620363 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2296512286 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2348320600 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2356966171 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2376554757 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2385881138 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2403771940 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2277222295 @default.
• W2053388970 hasRelatedWork W2722166335 @default.
• W2053388970 hasVolume "355" @default.
• W2053388970 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2053388970 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2053388970 magId "2053388970" @default.
• W2053388970 workType "article" @default.