FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2053642408> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2053642408 endingPage "132" @default.
• W2053642408 startingPage "119" @default.
• W2053642408 abstract "Abstract In the context of evidence-based clinical practice (EBCP), the reliability of empirical data is largely determined by the methodological quality of research design. PsycBITE™ (Psychological Database of Brain Impairment Treatment Efficacy) is a web-based database listing all published, empirical reports on the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for the psychological consequences of acquired brain impairment (ABI). The aim of this study was to survey the listings of PsycBITE™ and examine the methodological quality of the reports it contains. Reports listed in PsycBITE™ include systematic reviews (SRs), randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, case series (CSs) and single-subject designs (SSDs). They are indexed according to research design, neurological group, patient age group, target area and intervention type. The PEDro Scale is used to rate the methodological quality of RCTs, nonRCTs and CSs, with maximum obtainable methodological quality rating (MQR) of 10/10, 8/10 and 2/10 respectively. A search identified 1298 reports indexed in PsycBITE™. The largest proportion was SSDs (39%), followed by CSs (22%), RCTs (21%), non-RCTs (11%) and SRs (7%). The majority of reports was concerned with stroke (41%), traumatic brain injury (29%) and Alzheimer's and related dementias (22%). The most frequently investigated deficits were communication/language/speech disorders (24%); independent/self-care activities (19%); behaviour problems (17%); memory impairments (17%); anxiety, depression, stress, adjustment (15%). Approximately half of the RCTs, non-RCTs and CSs were rated for methodological quality. Mean MQR scores for RCTs, non-RCTs and CSs were 4.49, 2.85 and 1.15 respectively. While some PEDro criteria were met by a high proportion of RCTs and non-RCTs (≥ 70%), other criteria were only met by a small proportion of reports (as low as 1.6%). There was no significant difference in MQR scores between RCTs focusing on different neurological groups or target areas. Furthermore, there was no discernible improvement in MQR score for RCTs published over the last three decades. The methodological quality of studies investigating the efficacy of rehabilitation interventions in ABI has been consistently modest over several decades. This is largely attributable to poor adherence to fundamental tenets of research design, and requires urgent remediation. RCTs (and to a lesser extent, non-RCTs) are research methodologies which can potentially yield a high level of evidence, but only if they are adequately designed. PsycBITE™ has the facility to raise awareness of these issues and be instrumental in promoting EBCP in the field of ABI." @default.
• W2053642408 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2053642408 creator A5003165340 @default.
• W2053642408 creator A5014495764 @default.
• W2053642408 creator A5018853944 @default.
• W2053642408 creator A5031058055 @default.
• W2053642408 creator A5033795364 @default.
• W2053642408 creator A5044724071 @default.
• W2053642408 creator A5082568849 @default.
• W2053642408 creator A5087641170 @default.
• W2053642408 date "2006-09-01" @default.
• W2053642408 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2053642408 title "The Evidence Base of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation in Acquired Brain Impairment (ABI): How Good is the Research?" @default.
• W2053642408 cites W1660053632 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W1979348339 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W1986215651 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W1988053458 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W1997618340 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2038837365 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2044647248 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2058401828 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2058593695 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2080892226 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2081337923 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2085931676 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2117532436 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2142960568 @default.
• W2053642408 cites W2151607446 @default.
• W2053642408 doi "https://doi.org/10.1375/brim.7.2.119" @default.
• W2053642408 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2053642408 type Work @default.
• W2053642408 sameAs 2053642408 @default.
• W2053642408 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082012 @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082013 @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082014 @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082015 @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082016 @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082018 @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082019 @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082021 @default.
• W2053642408 countsByYear W20536424082023 @default.
• W2053642408 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2053642408 hasAuthorship W2053642408A5003165340 @default.
• W2053642408 hasAuthorship W2053642408A5014495764 @default.
• W2053642408 hasAuthorship W2053642408A5018853944 @default.
• W2053642408 hasAuthorship W2053642408A5031058055 @default.
• W2053642408 hasAuthorship W2053642408A5033795364 @default.
• W2053642408 hasAuthorship W2053642408A5044724071 @default.
• W2053642408 hasAuthorship W2053642408A5082568849 @default.
• W2053642408 hasAuthorship W2053642408A5087641170 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C14216870 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C2779224077 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C118552586 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C126322002 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C14216870 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C151730666 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C15744967 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C168563851 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C169900460 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C1862650 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C27415008 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C2778818304 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C2779224077 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C2779343474 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C558461103 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C70410870 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C71924100 @default.
• W2053642408 hasConceptScore W2053642408C86803240 @default.
• W2053642408 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2053642408 hasLocation W20536424081 @default.
• W2053642408 hasOpenAccess W2053642408 @default.
• W2053642408 hasPrimaryLocation W20536424081 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W2007641510 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W2092168028 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W2101319411 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W2462765168 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W2524218776 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W2606375237 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W2609940642 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W3001499522 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W3209915159 @default.
• W2053642408 hasRelatedWork W4321332173 @default.
• W2053642408 hasVolume "7" @default.

• next