FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2053644114> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2053644114 endingPage "1314" @default.
• W2053644114 startingPage "1311" @default.
• W2053644114 abstract "There have been a myriad of rehabilitation techniques for patients after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery, varying from professionally delivered physical therapy to self use of tongue blades. Most recently continuous passive motion (CPM) has been introduced for postsurgical TMJ patients. The benefits of CPM have been attributed both to its continuous and its passive nature. While the continuous nature of the therapy is accepted, questions remain regarding the passivity of the motion. The purpose of this study was to electromyographically evaluate the degree of activity that occurs with CPM compared with simple mandibular exercises in TMJ rehabilitation. Eight patients who had arthroscopy or arthrotomy were begun on a CPM device postsurgically. Electromyographic data were obtained for jaw closing and opening activity. Patients were measured using CPM as well as tongue depressors. Three different exercises were performed: 1) activity at rest was compared with rest with CPM; 2) opening and closing with CPM versus use of tongue depressors was compared; and 3) maximum opening to a comfortable position was compared using tongue depressors versus the CPM device in a fixed open position. The degree of opening was matched for both groups. A significant difference in electromyographic activity was shown between patients using CPM versus tongue depressors during the open/closing cycles. This suggests that TMJ CPM is truly passive. There have been a myriad of rehabilitation techniques for patients after temporomandibular joint (TMJ) surgery, varying from professionally delivered physical therapy to self use of tongue blades. Most recently continuous passive motion (CPM) has been introduced for postsurgical TMJ patients. The benefits of CPM have been attributed both to its continuous and its passive nature. While the continuous nature of the therapy is accepted, questions remain regarding the passivity of the motion. The purpose of this study was to electromyographically evaluate the degree of activity that occurs with CPM compared with simple mandibular exercises in TMJ rehabilitation. Eight patients who had arthroscopy or arthrotomy were begun on a CPM device postsurgically. Electromyographic data were obtained for jaw closing and opening activity. Patients were measured using CPM as well as tongue depressors. Three different exercises were performed: 1) activity at rest was compared with rest with CPM; 2) opening and closing with CPM versus use of tongue depressors was compared; and 3) maximum opening to a comfortable position was compared using tongue depressors versus the CPM device in a fixed open position. The degree of opening was matched for both groups. A significant difference in electromyographic activity was shown between patients using CPM versus tongue depressors during the open/closing cycles. This suggests that TMJ CPM is truly passive." @default.
• W2053644114 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2053644114 creator A5031751624 @default.
• W2053644114 creator A5038602089 @default.
• W2053644114 date "1993-12-01" @default.
• W2053644114 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2053644114 title "Electromyographic evaluation of continuous passive motion versus manual rehabilitation of the temporomandibular joint" @default.
• W2053644114 cites W1518528885 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W1900770822 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W1995567231 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2001094628 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2009628458 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2016408876 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2019948438 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2101744233 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2122243078 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2145402064 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2145577400 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W2227059894 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W4244069863 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W4293467345 @default.
• W2053644114 cites W608448141 @default.
• W2053644114 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80133-8" @default.
• W2053644114 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8229409" @default.
• W2053644114 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W2053644114 type Work @default.
• W2053644114 sameAs 2053644114 @default.
• W2053644114 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2053644114 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2053644114 hasAuthorship W2053644114A5031751624 @default.
• W2053644114 hasAuthorship W2053644114A5038602089 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C2776514915 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C2777160814 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C2777515770 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C2778775528 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C2779744641 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C2780202543 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C141071460 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C142724271 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C17744445 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C1862650 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C199343813 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C199539241 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C2776514915 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C2777160814 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C2777515770 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C2778775528 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C2778818304 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C2779162959 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C2779744641 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C2780202543 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C29694066 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C71924100 @default.
• W2053644114 hasConceptScore W2053644114C99508421 @default.
• W2053644114 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2053644114 hasLocation W20536441141 @default.
• W2053644114 hasLocation W20536441142 @default.
• W2053644114 hasOpenAccess W2053644114 @default.
• W2053644114 hasPrimaryLocation W20536441141 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W146064633 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W2034907576 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W2035811372 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W2053644114 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W2060794827 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W2063079787 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W2075357454 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W2128244667 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W2462278486 @default.
• W2053644114 hasRelatedWork W4229004569 @default.
• W2053644114 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W2053644114 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2053644114 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2053644114 magId "2053644114" @default.
• W2053644114 workType "article" @default.