FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2053847921> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2053847921 endingPage "877" @default.
• W2053847921 startingPage "869" @default.
• W2053847921 abstract "The aim of this study is to evaluate the visual attention skills of deaf children with cochlear implants and to determine whether age at implantation had any impact on visual attention skills.Thirty children with cochlear implants aged 6 and 11 years were evaluated and were compared with age matched 36 normal hearing children. The children with cochlear implants were analyzed in to two groups according to their age at implantation; under and at/over 4 years old. The Gordon Diagnostic System (GDS) was used in order to evaluate visual attention skills of cochlear implanted (Group 1 and Group 2) and children with normal hearing. The number of correct responses, extraneous button presses (commission errors) and the number of omission errors or the failure to respond to target stimuli which were recorded by GDS was used to evaluate the visual attention skills of the subjects. Also six different types of commission errors (19X, XX9, XX1, X1X, X9X, XXX) were analyzed and compared both for normal and cochlear implant user children.Concerning the total number of correct response, omission and commission errors no statistical difference was found between two implanted groups. Besides, both groups with cochlear implantation differed from normal hearing peers on the total number of correct responses, omission errors (p<0.017). According to these findings cochlear implanted children had less correct responses and had more omission errors compared with control group. These findings clearly show that children with cochlear implants performed poorly on visual attention task which requires constant attention together with the ability to exert impulse control despite they hear enhanced sensory information by cochlear implants. Concerning the types of commission errors Group 1 and 2 performed similarly in all types of errors (p>0.017). Besides, Group 1 and 2 made more errors in types 19X, XX9 and XXX, XX9 compared with the control group (p<0.017). Group 2 who had their implants after age of 4 years old had more commission errors than the control group (p<0.017) and positive correlation was found between the total commission errors and XX9 error type with age at implantation. These findings show that children who had their implants at older ages made more commission errors and XX9 type of commission error. The children who were implanted after 4 years old were less mature; unsuccessful in controlling their impulsive behaviors and more careless where they can not get enough benefit from social and environmental motives compared with their normal hearing peers.This present research points out the positive effect of early implantation on visual attention and the possible adversities such as impulsivity, over-impatience and attention deficits which have been previously suggested as preventive or slowing down factors for the pace of auditory-verbal therapy for cochlear implantees. Assuming that the results of this study support the theory of insufficiency which suggested that the deprivation in auditory system would also adversely affect cognitive structures involved in intermodal processing the importance of early implantation is underlined. If early cochlear implantation will be carried out especially at the very critical period of language development (before age of four), this will help the child, in his/her future life, not only with his/her hearing skills and communication but for his/her attention skills and behavior." @default.
• W2053847921 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2053847921 creator A5057878759 @default.
• W2053847921 creator A5083805925 @default.
• W2053847921 date "2008-06-01" @default.
• W2053847921 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2053847921 title "The effect of implantation age on visual attention skills" @default.
• W2053847921 cites W1984644476 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W1986996935 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W1990739115 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W1991900974 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W1993649601 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2009699431 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2027923203 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2029078826 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2030180301 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2036334841 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2039211531 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2041116801 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2041332957 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2056129871 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2063431138 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W206750491 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2068415541 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2074989205 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2113749539 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2124724016 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2135013500 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2141109139 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2142047030 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2166610719 @default.
• W2053847921 cites W2338418188 @default.
• W2053847921 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.02.017" @default.
• W2053847921 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18395272" @default.
• W2053847921 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2053847921 type Work @default.
• W2053847921 sameAs 2053847921 @default.
• W2053847921 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212012 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212013 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212014 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212016 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212017 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212018 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212019 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212020 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212021 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212022 @default.
• W2053847921 countsByYear W20538479212023 @default.
• W2053847921 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2053847921 hasAuthorship W2053847921A5057878759 @default.
• W2053847921 hasAuthorship W2053847921A5083805925 @default.
• W2053847921 hasConcept C2778882171 @default.
• W2053847921 hasConcept C3017423656 @default.
• W2053847921 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2053847921 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2053847921 hasConceptScore W2053847921C2778882171 @default.
• W2053847921 hasConceptScore W2053847921C3017423656 @default.
• W2053847921 hasConceptScore W2053847921C548259974 @default.
• W2053847921 hasConceptScore W2053847921C71924100 @default.
• W2053847921 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2053847921 hasLocation W20538479211 @default.
• W2053847921 hasLocation W20538479212 @default.
• W2053847921 hasOpenAccess W2053847921 @default.
• W2053847921 hasPrimaryLocation W20538479211 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W2027737812 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W2053847921 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W2134305968 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W2140718350 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W2432200821 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W2810582249 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W2811205641 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W3099724722 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W3127599490 @default.
• W2053847921 hasRelatedWork W2444514541 @default.
• W2053847921 hasVolume "72" @default.
• W2053847921 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2053847921 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2053847921 magId "2053847921" @default.
• W2053847921 workType "article" @default.