FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2053867919> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2053867919 endingPage "685" @default.
• W2053867919 startingPage "685" @default.
• W2053867919 abstract "Gradual increase maximum loading test (GMT) and six seconds all-out test (SAT) both have demonstrated good reliability and reproducibility for measure knee extensor electromyography (EMG) maximum value during cycling. However, the differences between the two methods are still unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare the two dynamic normalization methods during cyclling. METHODS: Ten healthy male subjects (age=24.2 + 4.1 yrs) who had no known musculoskeletal or neurological diseases participated in this study. AcqKnowledge Biopac system was used to collect the EMG activities of vastus medialis oblique (VMO) and vastus lateralis (VL) while each subject performed the two cycling normalization tests on the ergometer (Monark, ergomedic 828E, Stockholm, Sweden). Subject performed a standardized 5-minute warm-up (1kp and 85 rpm) first and then resistance was gradually increased until the subject's maximum tolerable resistance was determined (GMT process). The maximum tolerable resistance was defined as the highest resistance level where the subject could still maintain 85 rpm cycling. After 10 min rest, the subject kept the 85 rpm pedaling velocity at the low loading (1.5∼2.5 kp) and then started to pedal as forcefully as possible for six seconds (SAT process) when a start signal was given to him. During the test, verbal encouragement was given to each subject. Matlab 2007 (Mathworks, USA) was used for data analysis to filter and then calculate root mean square from the two raw muscle EMG activities of each trial. SPSS for windows (version 12.0) was used to compare the levels of activity between GMT and SAT by pair T-test. Beside this, the coefficient of variation (CV) was presented, too. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: GMT had significantly higher activities than SAT in both of VL (59.3+33.6 vs. 41.0+30.5mV, p= 0.048) and VM (130.7+61.6 vs. 91.9+42.3mV, p= 0.027). The CV of GMT and SAT were similar (47.1, 46.0%). CONCLUSION: GMT showed higher muscle EMG activities in VMO and VL than SAT using the dynamic normalization methods during cycling." @default.
• W2053867919 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2053867919 creator A5009052904 @default.
• W2053867919 creator A5068048357 @default.
• W2053867919 date "2010-05-01" @default.
• W2053867919 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2053867919 title "Comparison of Knee Extensor EMG Activities During Cycling Using Two Dynamic Normalization Methods" @default.
• W2053867919 doi "https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000385912.41965.b4" @default.
• W2053867919 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2053867919 type Work @default.
• W2053867919 sameAs 2053867919 @default.
• W2053867919 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2053867919 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2053867919 hasAuthorship W2053867919A5009052904 @default.
• W2053867919 hasAuthorship W2053867919A5068048357 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C136886441 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C2777515770 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C2780993623 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C541528975 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C105795698 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C136886441 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C144024400 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C166957645 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C1862650 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C19165224 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C2777515770 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C2780993623 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C29694066 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C33923547 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C541528975 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C71924100 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C95457728 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C9893847 @default.
• W2053867919 hasConceptScore W2053867919C99508421 @default.
• W2053867919 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2053867919 hasLocation W20538679191 @default.
• W2053867919 hasOpenAccess W2053867919 @default.
• W2053867919 hasPrimaryLocation W20538679191 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W1571786784 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W1984390577 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W1987770025 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W2017229462 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W2053685648 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W2059468502 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W2339785670 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W2941630162 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W2983786612 @default.
• W2053867919 hasRelatedWork W4292178596 @default.
• W2053867919 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W2053867919 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2053867919 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2053867919 magId "2053867919" @default.
• W2053867919 workType "article" @default.