FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2054192275> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2054192275 endingPage "196" @default.
• W2054192275 startingPage "183" @default.
• W2054192275 abstract "Invasive ventilation is a common practice in intensive care units (ICUs). Once a patient is intubated, maintenance of the endotracheal tube placement is essential. When the ETT is not secured effectively, even basic nursing management can cause tube slippage which is a major factor in causing airway trauma. This study was aimed at comparing the effectiveness of three endotracheal tube securement techniques (Twill, Adhesive and Simple bow) on endotracheal tube slippage, external jugular venous pressure measurement, oral mucosa and facial skin integrity, pain intensity and on patient satisfaction after the fixation method. A randomized clinical trial was conducted at the intensive care units in Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital. It included a sample of 90 patients, randomly allocated to the three equal groups: Twill, Adhesive and Simple bow groups, 30 subjects for each. The tools used for data collection included demographic and clinical data sheet, the time profile of ETT fixation method sheet and scales for endotracheal tube (ETT) slippage, external jugular venous pressure (EJVP) measurement, oral assessment guide (OAG) for oral mucosa, Facial Skin Integrity, pain intensity and patient satisfaction procedure scale. The study maneuvers were applied according to the group. Both ETT slippage and EJVP were measured at 15, 30, 60 and 120 min post fixation method. At 120 min, 73% of patients in the Twill group had no slippage compared to Simple bow (50%) and (36%) in Adhesive groups. However, at 30 min post fixation method 90% of patients in the Twill group had normal EJVP measurement compared to Simple bow and Adhesive groups (70% and 57%, respectively), with a statistically significant difference between the three groups. At 60 min, only 10% of patients in the Twill group had high EJVP compared to Simple bow (37%) and Adhesive groups (47%) with a statistically significant difference among them. As well, at 120 min post fixation method, most patients in the Twill group (97%) had normal EJVP measurement, compared to the Adhesive (60%) and Simple bow (57%) groups. Oral mucosa and facial skin integrity assessment was done for all patients in the three study groups at 2, 6, 12, and at 24 h post fixation method. For oral mucosa at 24 h post fixation method, 80% of patients in the Twill group had healthy oral mucosa compared to Simple bow and Adhesive groups (47% and 37%, respectively), with a statistically significant difference between the three groups (P = 0.07). For facial skin integrity, at 6 h, no one of patients in the Twill and Simple bow groups had severe facial skin reaction compared to patients in the Adhesive group (7%) and the difference was statistically significant, (P = 0.01). As well, a statistically significant difference was revealed among the three groups, at 12 and 24 h post fixation method, (P = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively). The Twill technique had the shortest time taken for application and removal of securement method than other groups. Additionally, the Twill group had the lowest scores of pain at all three assessment times (5, 10 and 20 min), whereas those in the Adhesive group had the highest scores. All these differences were statistically significant, (P < 0.001). Overall, 80% of patients in the Twill group were satisfied, compared to 57% in the Simple bow group, and 37% only in the Adhesive group. It is concluded that Twill technique is an ETT securement technique in ICUs for orally intubated patients. It is recommended to use this method, with development of strategies to prevent slippage aiming at increasing patient safety after securement technique intervention." @default.
• W2054192275 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2054192275 creator A5008228871 @default.
• W2054192275 creator A5089745083 @default.
• W2054192275 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2054192275 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2054192275 title "Endotracheal tube securements: Effectiveness of three techniques among orally intubated patients" @default.
• W2054192275 cites W1502264420 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W1980123919 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W1998586893 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2010738525 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2013988152 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2021576896 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2024581654 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2030178297 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2040961668 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2046592912 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2049602848 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2050712781 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2063178652 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2073575422 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2080839319 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2085487911 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2087811457 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2123727268 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2124585699 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2143733679 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2145566510 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2154437809 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2163292790 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2165587557 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2171729249 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2238488048 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2286698267 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W2407350954 @default.
• W2054192275 cites W4235822012 @default.
• W2054192275 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcdt.2014.09.006" @default.
• W2054192275 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2054192275 type Work @default.
• W2054192275 sameAs 2054192275 @default.
• W2054192275 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2054192275 countsByYear W20541922752016 @default.
• W2054192275 countsByYear W20541922752017 @default.
• W2054192275 countsByYear W20541922752019 @default.
• W2054192275 countsByYear W20541922752022 @default.
• W2054192275 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2054192275 hasAuthorship W2054192275A5008228871 @default.
• W2054192275 hasAuthorship W2054192275A5089745083 @default.
• W2054192275 hasBestOaLocation W20541922751 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C2776096238 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C126322002 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C127413603 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C141071460 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C14184104 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C2775944032 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C2776096238 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C2776376669 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C42219234 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C66938386 @default.
• W2054192275 hasConceptScore W2054192275C71924100 @default.
• W2054192275 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2054192275 hasLocation W20541922751 @default.
• W2054192275 hasOpenAccess W2054192275 @default.
• W2054192275 hasPrimaryLocation W20541922751 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W2089201504 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2054192275 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2054192275 hasVolume "64" @default.
• W2054192275 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2054192275 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2054192275 magId "2054192275" @default.
• W2054192275 workType "article" @default.