FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2054261756> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2054261756 endingPage "1031" @default.
• W2054261756 startingPage "1028" @default.
• W2054261756 abstract "In Brief Objective: To prospectively examine the clinical role of routine repeat computed tomographic scans of the brain (CTB) in patients with traumatic head injury. Summary Background Data: The use of routine serial CTB after traumatic head injury is recommended by some authors, but remains controversial. Methods: From March 2007 to October 2008, all patients with traumatic head injury admitted to the Royal Melbourne Hospital, a metropolitan, Level I trauma center, were prospectively studied. After the initial computed tomography brain scans, any subsequent CTBs were assessed and were recorded as being either “clinically indicated” or “routine” and ensuing medical and surgical management. Inpatient information was recorded and comparisons made according to indication for CTB, Glasgow Coma Scale, and management changes. Results: A total of 651 patients were admitted with traumatic head injury over the 20-month study period. Of those, 39 underwent immediate craniotomy/craniectomy and were excluded from analysis. Another 25 were excluded due to incomplete data, leaving 591 patients for analysis. Of the 591 assessed, 401 were discharged with no further computed tomography investigation. One hundred and ninety patients underwent a total of 305 repeat brain scans, of which 149 were clinically indicated, whereas 156 were obtained as a “routine” investigation with no deterioration in patients' neurological status. Of the repeated scans, 71 were improved, 169 were unchanged, and 64 were worse. None of the 156 patients who received a “routine” CTB required a change in management. The 149 CTB performed for clinical deterioration resulted in a change in management in 28 patients (19%). The patients who underwent “indicated” computed tomographic scans and subsequently required a change in management were on average younger (P < 0.001) and more severely head injured (P = 0.001) than the patients not requiring a change in management. Conclusions: No patients from our cohort with a “routine” repeat CTB required a change in management. Given the costs and potential risks of routine repeat CTB, and lack of demonstrable benefit, the practice should be reconsidered. Repeat CTB is clearly indicated in patients with deteriorating neurological status, especially younger and more severely head-injured patients. All patients admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Center over 20 months with traumatic brain injury were prospectively observed. Change in patient management was only ever required after repeat computed tomography brain scans ordered for a clinical indication, and never in the 156 repeat computed tomography scans ordered routinely without clinical change." @default.
• W2054261756 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2054261756 creator A5008066104 @default.
• W2054261756 creator A5040549269 @default.
• W2054261756 creator A5060360211 @default.
• W2054261756 creator A5085991655 @default.
• W2054261756 creator A5089477204 @default.
• W2054261756 date "2011-12-01" @default.
• W2054261756 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2054261756 title "Do Routinely Repeated Computed Tomography Scans in Traumatic Brain Injury Influence Management?" @default.
• W2054261756 cites W1964665044 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W1970182381 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W1991315604 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W2001300452 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W2004348805 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W2013220068 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W2022358809 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W2040925358 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W2075336560 @default.
• W2054261756 cites W2083399987 @default.
• W2054261756 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318219727f" @default.
• W2054261756 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22112983" @default.
• W2054261756 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2054261756 type Work @default.
• W2054261756 sameAs 2054261756 @default.
• W2054261756 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562013 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562014 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562015 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562016 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562017 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562018 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562019 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562020 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562021 @default.
• W2054261756 countsByYear W20542617562022 @default.
• W2054261756 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2054261756 hasAuthorship W2054261756A5008066104 @default.
• W2054261756 hasAuthorship W2054261756A5040549269 @default.
• W2054261756 hasAuthorship W2054261756A5060360211 @default.
• W2054261756 hasAuthorship W2054261756A5085991655 @default.
• W2054261756 hasAuthorship W2054261756A5089477204 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C17624336 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C2777975874 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C2778871575 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C2780110798 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C2781017439 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C3019520628 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C118552586 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C141071460 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C167135981 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C17624336 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C188816634 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C2777975874 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C2778871575 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C2780110798 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C2781017439 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C3019520628 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C544519230 @default.
• W2054261756 hasConceptScore W2054261756C71924100 @default.
• W2054261756 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2054261756 hasLocation W20542617561 @default.
• W2054261756 hasLocation W20542617562 @default.
• W2054261756 hasOpenAccess W2054261756 @default.
• W2054261756 hasPrimaryLocation W20542617561 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W1964391555 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W1980871793 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W1987799906 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W2013220068 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W2014337770 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W2049059263 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W2069977715 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W2080245514 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W2573667943 @default.
• W2054261756 hasRelatedWork W3106864899 @default.
• W2054261756 hasVolume "254" @default.
• W2054261756 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2054261756 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2054261756 magId "2054261756" @default.
• W2054261756 workType "article" @default.