Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2054398051> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 90 of
90
with 100 items per page.
- W2054398051 endingPage "1099" @default.
- W2054398051 startingPage "1095" @default.
- W2054398051 abstract "Abstract The testing of chemicals for carcinogenic activity in lifetime rodent bioassays has produced a large amount of data on a few strains of mice and rats. Because of the use of fixed protocols in repeated experiments, the opportunity presents itself for using this historical data in the analysis of a current experiment. What has been considered is the statistical incorporation of the historical control data into the current control group to increase the power of the test. This is especially relevant when dealing with tumors of a rare type where the toxicologist will place great significance on their occurrence in a treatment group. Experimentally it is assumed that three groups of about 50 animals each are tested at two treatment levels and a control. The response for each treatment group is assumed to be binomial. Further it is assumed that the probability of an animal with a tumor in the control group has a beta distribution that is determined from the historical control data. Several authors (Dempster, Selwyn, and Weeks 1983; Hoel 1983; Tarone 1982) have investigated the problem of testing for linear trend in proportions when historical information is available. In this article we give a locally most powerful test of trend for binomial response data by using a beta prior distribution for the historical control information. This generalized test is closely related to Tarone's statistic and generalizes the conditional test of Hoel. Under various conditions on the beta parameters (α, β), the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic is given under the null hypothesis H 0 of no trend in proportions and for a general sequence of alternative hypotheses that converge to H 0. Using these results, the asymptotic gain due to the incorporation of historical controls is given. For the usual bioassay design the asymptotic relative efficiency depends on α + β and is shown to be about 1.3 to 2.2, depending on the values of the beta parameters (higher efficiency for larger values of α + β). If the coefficient of variation for the beta-binomial is held constant, then large values of α + β correspond to small values of the mean of the beta-binomial distribution (i.e., rare tumors). The use of an exact conditional test is discussed, because for small beta-binomial means the approximations using asymptotic theory are somewhat unrealistic. Problems with the use of normality are illustrated numerically. Tables are given that compare the significance probability for selected outcomes for the exact and asymptotic tests. Also included are values for the Cochran—Armitage test, using no historical information. These tables show that the incorporation of the historical information greatly improves the power of the test for small means of the beta-binomial. The second observation is that the asymptotic test appears to exceed its nominal size. These observations were made using a mean of 1% for the beta-binomial. For large values of the mean, that is, 20%, the tests generally agreed. Thus the incorporation of historical data in general and the exact conditional test in particular is especially important where the spontaneous rates are small." @default.
- W2054398051 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2054398051 creator A5000703120 @default.
- W2054398051 creator A5085699244 @default.
- W2054398051 date "1986-12-01" @default.
- W2054398051 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2054398051 title "Incorporating Historical Controls in Testing for a Trend in Proportions" @default.
- W2054398051 cites W2060198170 @default.
- W2054398051 cites W2069265373 @default.
- W2054398051 cites W2076899142 @default.
- W2054398051 cites W2403035479 @default.
- W2054398051 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478379" @default.
- W2054398051 hasPublicationYear "1986" @default.
- W2054398051 type Work @default.
- W2054398051 sameAs 2054398051 @default.
- W2054398051 citedByCount "21" @default.
- W2054398051 countsByYear W20543980512012 @default.
- W2054398051 countsByYear W20543980512015 @default.
- W2054398051 countsByYear W20543980512016 @default.
- W2054398051 countsByYear W20543980512018 @default.
- W2054398051 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2054398051 hasAuthorship W2054398051A5000703120 @default.
- W2054398051 hasAuthorship W2054398051A5085699244 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C100906024 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C110121322 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C169857963 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C191988596 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C199335787 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C203763787 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C2781315470 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C41054675 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C65409693 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C87007009 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C89128539 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C100906024 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C105795698 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C110121322 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C124101348 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C134306372 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C149782125 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C154945302 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C169857963 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C18903297 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C191988596 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C199335787 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C203763787 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C2775924081 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C2777267654 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C2781315470 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C33923547 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C41008148 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C41054675 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C65409693 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C86803240 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C87007009 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C89128539 @default.
- W2054398051 hasConceptScore W2054398051C99476002 @default.
- W2054398051 hasIssue "396" @default.
- W2054398051 hasLocation W20543980511 @default.
- W2054398051 hasOpenAccess W2054398051 @default.
- W2054398051 hasPrimaryLocation W20543980511 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W105892528 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W1965830413 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W2049531272 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W2054202364 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W2099207046 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W2102834481 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W2127561481 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W2254402185 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W3122563983 @default.
- W2054398051 hasRelatedWork W4244689324 @default.
- W2054398051 hasVolume "81" @default.
- W2054398051 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2054398051 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2054398051 magId "2054398051" @default.
- W2054398051 workType "article" @default.