Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2054501821> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 78 of
78
with 100 items per page.
- W2054501821 endingPage "1219" @default.
- W2054501821 startingPage "1218" @default.
- W2054501821 abstract "The minimal age limit at which intraocular lens (IOL) implantation should be used in children remains controversial. What is clear is that the younger the surgery is performed, the more unpredictable are the subsequent shifts in refractive error over time.1Mezer E. Rootman D.S. Abdolell M. Levin A.V. Early postoperative refractive outcomes of pediatric intraocular lens implantation.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30: 603-610Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar, 2Nihalani B. VanderVeen D.K. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in pediatric eyes.Ophthalmology. 2010; 117: 1493-1499Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar Various formulae designed for adult eyes, are used to calculate the IOL optical power needed to obtain the target postoperative refraction. These formulas have shown varying degrees of accuracy in the eyes of children. Other challenges to accurate IOL power calculation include the shorter pediatric eye with steeper corneas. Measurements performed under anesthesia may be more inaccurate due to uncertain “fixation.” In addition, refraction has to be done manually by retinoscopy rather than with an automated refractometer. We previously published a series of 59 eyes, which were mostly in the lower range of size for normal adult eyes.1Mezer E. Rootman D.S. Abdolell M. Levin A.V. Early postoperative refractive outcomes of pediatric intraocular lens implantation.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30: 603-610Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (49) Google Scholar The Hoffer Q formula resulted in better accuracy of prediction but the difference was not statistically significant than other newer theoretical formulas (Holladay 1and SRK/T).3Retzlaff J.A. Sanders D.R. Kraff M.C. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula.J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990; 16: 333-340Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (709) Google Scholar In contrast, the older regression formulas (SRK, SRKII) were statistically significantly less accurate. Nihalani and VanderVeen2Nihalani B. VanderVeen D.K. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in pediatric eyes.Ophthalmology. 2010; 117: 1493-1499Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar examined 135 eyes of which 69 were shorter than average. This enabled them to perform subgroup analysis, which was not possible in our previous study due to the small sample size. They showed a trend toward greater prediction error (PE) in eyes of children younger than 2 years, in shorter eyes and steeper corneas. As in our study, Hoffer Q performed better than the other formulas, especially in younger children and in short eyes. No statistical significance was reported in this study. Perhaps the major difference between their work and ours was the follow-up length: up to 2 months in their paper and up to 6 months in ours. A significant deviation from predicted refraction of more than 0.5 diopter (D) was noted in the Nihalani study in almost 60% of the cases with a tendency for all formulas towards undercorrection. The PE range utilizing Hoffer Q was 1.86 D after a follow-up of 1 to 2 months. Our study shows that this trend continues using all formulas with a deviation from predicted refraction of 1.1 D on average (range to 3.03 D) 2-3 months after surgery using Hoffer Q. The PE in our study further increased after 2 to 6 months of follow-up, again with the Hoffer Q formula, and reached an average of 1.37 D (range of 7.4 D). In conclusion, our ability to hit the target refraction for pediatric IOL implantation is still imperfect. This is especially true for younger children or those with shorter eyes. We join Nihalani and VanderVeen in suggesting that until further refinement of IOL power calculation for pediatric eyes is achieved, surgeons, and parents should be aware of the inherent variation in prediction of the refractive outcome. Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulae in Pediatric EyesOphthalmologyVol. 117Issue 8PreviewTo evaluate accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae (SRK II, SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q) in pediatric eyes. Full-Text PDF Author replyOphthalmologyVol. 118Issue 6PreviewWe would like to thank Dr. Mezer and Dr. Levin for their interest in our article1 and for bringing out interesting comparison points between their previously published study2 and our recent study. The aim of our study was to evaluate accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae; hence, we only included the first postoperative refraction obtained between 4 to 8 weeks after surgery. We did not evaluate refractive changes over time as these may be influenced by the myopic shift, which is higher in younger children. Full-Text PDF" @default.
- W2054501821 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2054501821 creator A5058014058 @default.
- W2054501821 creator A5067996965 @default.
- W2054501821 date "2011-06-01" @default.
- W2054501821 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2054501821 title "Pediatric IOL Calculation" @default.
- W2054501821 cites W1997345698 @default.
- W2054501821 cites W2008634522 @default.
- W2054501821 cites W2156092858 @default.
- W2054501821 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.024" @default.
- W2054501821 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21640263" @default.
- W2054501821 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2054501821 type Work @default.
- W2054501821 sameAs 2054501821 @default.
- W2054501821 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2054501821 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2054501821 hasAuthorship W2054501821A5058014058 @default.
- W2054501821 hasAuthorship W2054501821A5067996965 @default.
- W2054501821 hasBestOaLocation W20545018211 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C204442743 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C205318122 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C2776864138 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C2778695240 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C2779501256 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C2779567214 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C2781095051 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C2781135284 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C118487528 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C119767625 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C120665830 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C121332964 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C17744445 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C199539241 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C204442743 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C205318122 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C2776864138 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C2778257484 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C2778695240 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C2779473830 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C2779501256 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C2779567214 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C2781095051 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C2781135284 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C71924100 @default.
- W2054501821 hasConceptScore W2054501821C83867959 @default.
- W2054501821 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W2054501821 hasLocation W20545018211 @default.
- W2054501821 hasLocation W20545018212 @default.
- W2054501821 hasOpenAccess W2054501821 @default.
- W2054501821 hasPrimaryLocation W20545018211 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W1985182670 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W2008634522 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W2012134101 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W2037635510 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W2040625826 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W2069024219 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W2154296432 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W2399009615 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W3032572794 @default.
- W2054501821 hasRelatedWork W3212368959 @default.
- W2054501821 hasVolume "118" @default.
- W2054501821 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2054501821 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2054501821 magId "2054501821" @default.
- W2054501821 workType "article" @default.