FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2054540507> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2054540507 endingPage "750" @default.
• W2054540507 startingPage "747" @default.
• W2054540507 abstract "The pre-Socratic Greek philosopher Protagoras (490 BC– 420 BC) made an argument about 2,500 years ago: Man is the measure of all things—of things which are, how they are, and of things which are not, how they are not [1]. This controversial idea is in contrast with a long-standing paradigm claiming that the universe is based on objective matters and outside the human’s subjective influence. Similarly, the use of objective methods such as laboratory tests and diagnostic imaging rather than subjective and self-reported methods to evaluate patient health outcomes has dominated medical sciences for several 100 years. Although clinicians and policy makers have gradually accepted the notions ‘‘quality of life (QOL),’’ ‘‘healthrelated quality of life (HRQOL),’’ or ‘‘patient-reported outcomes (PROs)’’ as an endpoint in the adult setting, the pediatric setting has lagged behind in considering selfreports in concept initiation, instrument development, and clinical application of PROs. We conventionally believed that children’s self-reported health information is unreliable and together with complex developmental issues, resulted in insufficient attention to and under-utilization of pediatric PRO data. Indeed, children are able to report their health status in an adequate manner [2], and pediatric PRO instruments need to carefully accommodate specific content related to children’s cognitive development as well as reading ability, vocabulary, and language skill. This special section of Quality of Life Research includes four articles exclusively focusing on the theme of pediatric PROs. Two articles applied the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health—Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY) as a framework to compare the conceptual content of pediatric PROs embedded in existing instruments for children and adolescents with chronic conditions [3, 4]. One article synthesized the constructs of PRO instruments for pediatric cancer [5], and another article summarized the development of the KIDSCREEN which is commonly used in European pediatric studies [6]. We applaud the authors for their efforts and useful findings in pediatric PRO measurement. The comparison among pediatric PRO instruments is a challenging task because these instruments were not created based on the same conceptual foundation. Instrument developers use different conceptual frameworks to generate target PROs with specific content and domains and employ various stakeholder-engagement processes to create items. They also apply different psychometric methods to evaluate PRO measures. Previous review articles on pediatric PRO instruments might be misleading because the comparison is confined to the ‘‘face value’’ of the instrument domains [7–9]. These studies often assumed that the domains named by individual instruments (e.g., physical functioning) reflected the genuine concepts of PROs, neglecting the actual content of the items embedded in each instrument. Consequently, the same domain name across different instruments does not necessarily mean they I.-C. Huang (&) D. A. Revicki Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100177, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA e-mail: ichuang@ufl.edu" @default.
• W2054540507 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2054540507 creator A5001054264 @default.
• W2054540507 creator A5051828530 @default.
• W2054540507 creator A5081334208 @default.
• W2054540507 date "2013-12-22" @default.
• W2054540507 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2054540507 title "Measuring pediatric patient-reported outcomes: good progress but a long way to go" @default.
• W2054540507 cites W1984119273 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W1990706365 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2000080211 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2025419101 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2033513592 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2046241491 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2054053084 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2083226031 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2099716808 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2105402351 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2111818224 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2126285244 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2155761042 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2162420979 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W2168448906 @default.
• W2054540507 cites W4292024189 @default.
• W2054540507 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0607-2" @default.
• W2054540507 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4301734" @default.
• W2054540507 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24362765" @default.
• W2054540507 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2054540507 type Work @default.
• W2054540507 sameAs 2054540507 @default.
• W2054540507 citedByCount "50" @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072014 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072015 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072016 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072017 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072018 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072019 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072020 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072021 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072022 @default.
• W2054540507 countsByYear W20545405072023 @default.
• W2054540507 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2054540507 hasAuthorship W2054540507A5001054264 @default.
• W2054540507 hasAuthorship W2054540507A5051828530 @default.
• W2054540507 hasAuthorship W2054540507A5081334208 @default.
• W2054540507 hasBestOaLocation W20545405071 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConcept C2778091340 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConceptScore W2054540507C138816342 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConceptScore W2054540507C159110408 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConceptScore W2054540507C177713679 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConceptScore W2054540507C2778091340 @default.
• W2054540507 hasConceptScore W2054540507C71924100 @default.
• W2054540507 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2054540507 hasLocation W20545405071 @default.
• W2054540507 hasLocation W20545405072 @default.
• W2054540507 hasLocation W20545405073 @default.
• W2054540507 hasLocation W20545405074 @default.
• W2054540507 hasOpenAccess W2054540507 @default.
• W2054540507 hasPrimaryLocation W20545405071 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W2070151489 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W2070549322 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W2074634433 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W2592677275 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W2801505957 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W2888091581 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W2891610563 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W2900798622 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W4252371801 @default.
• W2054540507 hasRelatedWork W4297900997 @default.
• W2054540507 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2054540507 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2054540507 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2054540507 magId "2054540507" @default.
• W2054540507 workType "article" @default.