FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2055241519> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2055241519 endingPage "271.e6" @default.
• W2055241519 startingPage "266" @default.
• W2055241519 abstract "Background & AimsPerforming single endoscopic examinations or selective screening based on risk might be more practical than recommended screening strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the cost effectiveness of these strategies, under real-life conditions of suboptimal compliance, and the societal cost perspective.MethodsWe used Markov modeling to analyze data from 787,000 individuals in Singapore, aged 50 to 75 years, with an age-standardized rate of CRC of 30 to 40/100,000 in 2009. Potential outcomes, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and net health benefit were compared between single sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy and current recommended screening strategies, and also with a strategy of selective screening based on risk of CRC.ResultsPerforming single sigmoidoscopies on individuals when they are 60 years old was the cheapest screening strategy; it would reduce CRC incidence by 19% and mortality by 16%, compared with no screening. A single colonoscopy is less cost effective than a single sigmoidoscopy, unless the proportion of right-sided lesions exceeds 65%. The fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio when all strategies were compared with no screening; iFOBT and colonoscopic examinations every 10 years each had extended dominance over other strategies. Screening subjects 50 to 60 years old by iFOBT and subjects 60 to 72 years old with colonoscopies every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy (US$25,000/quality-adjusted life-years). Risk for CRC, adherence, and cost of colonoscopy were the main determinants of cost effectiveness, based on sensitivity analysis.ConclusionsMarkov modeling analysis indicates that selectively screening individuals for CRC based on risk is the most cost-effective approach; it limits the cost and number of colonoscopies needed and significantly reduces CRC mortality. Performing single endoscopic examinations or selective screening based on risk might be more practical than recommended screening strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the cost effectiveness of these strategies, under real-life conditions of suboptimal compliance, and the societal cost perspective. We used Markov modeling to analyze data from 787,000 individuals in Singapore, aged 50 to 75 years, with an age-standardized rate of CRC of 30 to 40/100,000 in 2009. Potential outcomes, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and net health benefit were compared between single sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy and current recommended screening strategies, and also with a strategy of selective screening based on risk of CRC. Performing single sigmoidoscopies on individuals when they are 60 years old was the cheapest screening strategy; it would reduce CRC incidence by 19% and mortality by 16%, compared with no screening. A single colonoscopy is less cost effective than a single sigmoidoscopy, unless the proportion of right-sided lesions exceeds 65%. The fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio when all strategies were compared with no screening; iFOBT and colonoscopic examinations every 10 years each had extended dominance over other strategies. Screening subjects 50 to 60 years old by iFOBT and subjects 60 to 72 years old with colonoscopies every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy (US$25,000/quality-adjusted life-years). Risk for CRC, adherence, and cost of colonoscopy were the main determinants of cost effectiveness, based on sensitivity analysis. Markov modeling analysis indicates that selectively screening individuals for CRC based on risk is the most cost-effective approach; it limits the cost and number of colonoscopies needed and significantly reduces CRC mortality." @default.
• W2055241519 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2055241519 creator A5011143327 @default.
• W2055241519 creator A5028905834 @default.
• W2055241519 creator A5057982443 @default.
• W2055241519 creator A5088408965 @default.
• W2055241519 date "2012-03-01" @default.
• W2055241519 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2055241519 title "Screening Based on Risk for Colorectal Cancer Is the Most Cost-Effective Approach" @default.
• W2055241519 cites W1972537482 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W1974643789 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W1979044834 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W1990875370 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W1997821617 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2019900690 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2021362203 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2026099883 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2043951092 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2097680546 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2102993164 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2123837974 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2136864841 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2137632872 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2146233513 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2154240563 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2157609868 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2163214467 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2164654252 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2363537531 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2511664092 @default.
• W2055241519 cites W2105506474 @default.
• W2055241519 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.11.011" @default.
• W2055241519 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22100624" @default.
• W2055241519 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2055241519 type Work @default.
• W2055241519 sameAs 2055241519 @default.
• W2055241519 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192012 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192013 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192014 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192015 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192017 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192018 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192019 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192020 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192022 @default.
• W2055241519 countsByYear W20552415192023 @default.
• W2055241519 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2055241519 hasAuthorship W2055241519A5011143327 @default.
• W2055241519 hasAuthorship W2055241519A5028905834 @default.
• W2055241519 hasAuthorship W2055241519A5057982443 @default.
• W2055241519 hasAuthorship W2055241519A5088408965 @default.
• W2055241519 hasBestOaLocation W20552415191 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C2779158730 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C2779896975 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C2993160541 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C515549039 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C112930515 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C121608353 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C126322002 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C143998085 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C2778435480 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C2779158730 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C2779896975 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C2993160541 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C3019080777 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C515549039 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C526805850 @default.
• W2055241519 hasConceptScore W2055241519C71924100 @default.
• W2055241519 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2055241519 hasLocation W20552415191 @default.
• W2055241519 hasLocation W20552415192 @default.
• W2055241519 hasOpenAccess W2055241519 @default.
• W2055241519 hasPrimaryLocation W20552415191 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W1975731400 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W1998065118 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W2004149581 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W2047605823 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W2062369431 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W2253873246 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W2336862987 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W2345265177 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W2968868622 @default.
• W2055241519 hasRelatedWork W4365815135 @default.
• W2055241519 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2055241519 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2055241519 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2055241519 magId "2055241519" @default.
• W2055241519 workType "article" @default.