FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2055376365> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2055376365 endingPage "511" @default.
• W2055376365 startingPage "489" @default.
• W2055376365 abstract "Whilst randomized studies into the safety of chorionic villus sampling (CVS) are already under way the technique is now offered as an acceptable alternative to amniocentesis in many diagnostic centres. In counselling, the obstetrician can now quote a risk to the pregnancy of 2–4% which, even if the inevitable losses before 16 weeks are excluded, represents probably at least twice the risk of amniocentesis. The evolution of the obstetric procedures has meant that the transcervical approach to CVS has been the most popular to date but there is now increasing interest in transabdominal aspiration as it minimizes the possibility of infection. The two best known transcervical methods are aspiration with a plastic or metal cannula and biopsy with rigid forceps. The majority of aspirations have been performed using the Portex cannula technique. Using this, three centres (Milan, Chicago and Philadelphia) have had experience of over 5000 cases with a failure rate of less than 1% and a minimal fetal loss of 2.2%. However, the proportion of fetal losses may be between 4 and 7% by the time complete obstetric follow-up is available (Brambati et al, 1985) . A similar technique has been used with a variety of cannulae. The experience of the first 1000 cases from San Francisco (Hogge et al, 1986) led them to conclude that CVS by this technique was acceptably safe but that continuing investigation was needed before CVS was offered routinely as an alternative to amniocentesis. The only other transcervical technique that is practical for routine use is biopsy with rigid forceps. The failure and fetal loss rates associated with this method are comparable to the aspiration technique. The pioneering work of Hahnemann and his colleague Smidt-Jensen has established transabdominal aspiration as a reliable alternative approach. Its main advantage should be to minimize the risk of infection which is inherent in all transcervical techniques. In addition, it does not need to be confined to 9–11 weeks gestation and thus offers couples the possibility of diagnosis between 12 and 14 weeks rather than waiting for amniocentesis at 16 weeks. The quality and quantity of the sample depends on the size of the needle used and the technique is said to have high patient acceptability. Nevertheless, fetal losses occur following the procedure (1.8–3.2%) and it may not always be successful (failure rate 1.9–4.2%). Diagnostic problems exist in dealing with villi rather than amniocytes which may result from maternal contamination or the differences (biochemical and of the fetal karyotype) between the two. These need to be covered in preliminary counselling. It is hoped that the randomized studies will ascertain whether any long-term effects on the child may be associated with CVS, but with an increasing number of children born after CVS there are no apparent problems. In the meantime, even amongst women with a comparatively low genetic risk there is an increasing desire to consider CVS rather than wait for amniocentesis, and indications to date suggest that although the overall risk to the pregnancy is greater, this is often acceptable because of the opportunity of early diagnosis." @default.
• W2055376365 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2055376365 creator A5083209380 @default.
• W2055376365 date "1987-09-01" @default.
• W2055376365 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2055376365 title "1 Techniques of chorion villus sampling" @default.
• W2055376365 cites W136968612 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W155910393 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W1613360404 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W1973356760 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W1992517763 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W1994520193 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W1996011024 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W1998298027 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2002971125 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2004082093 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2011794657 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2015556317 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2026967037 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2029068564 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2040225538 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2051785719 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2052732013 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2053585178 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2069760946 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2073601770 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2079265781 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2080647711 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2083034760 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2083078157 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2091603951 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2091695435 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2097134931 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2111887212 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2138635286 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2146934674 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2150416052 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2154231551 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2159503187 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W21642987 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2167179016 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2245706030 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2312385825 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W2406339215 @default.
• W2055376365 cites W60729461 @default.
• W2055376365 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3552(87)80003-2" @default.
• W2055376365 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3325205" @default.
• W2055376365 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
• W2055376365 type Work @default.
• W2055376365 sameAs 2055376365 @default.
• W2055376365 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2055376365 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2055376365 hasAuthorship W2055376365A5083209380 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C2776555163 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C2776914593 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C2777966818 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C2778074680 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C2778258057 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C106131492 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C126838900 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C131872663 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C140779682 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C141071460 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C172680121 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C2775934546 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C2776555163 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C2776914593 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C2777966818 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C2778074680 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C2778258057 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C2779234561 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C29456083 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C31972630 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C41008148 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C54355233 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C61434518 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C71924100 @default.
• W2055376365 hasConceptScore W2055376365C86803240 @default.
• W2055376365 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2055376365 hasLocation W20553763651 @default.
• W2055376365 hasLocation W20553763652 @default.
• W2055376365 hasOpenAccess W2055376365 @default.
• W2055376365 hasPrimaryLocation W20553763651 @default.

• next