FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2055464904> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2055464904 endingPage "316" @default.
• W2055464904 startingPage "306" @default.
• W2055464904 abstract "Purpose: To investigate dosimetric differences among several clinical treatment planning systems (TPS) and Monte Carlo (MC) codes for brachytherapy of intraocular tumors using or plaques, and to evaluate the impact on the prescription dose of the adoption of MC codes and certain versions of a TPS (Plaque Simulator with optional modules). Methods: Three clinical brachytherapy TPS capable of intraocular brachytherapy treatment planning and two MC codes were compared. The TPS investigated were Pinnacle v8.0dp1, BrachyVision v8.1, and Plaque Simulator v5.3.9, all of which use the AAPM TG‐43 formalism in water. The Plaque Simulator software can also handle some correction factors from MC simulations. The MC codes used are MCNP5 v1.40 and BrachyDose/EGSnrc. Using these TPS and MC codes, three types of calculations were performed: homogeneous medium with point sources (for the TPS only, using the 1D TG‐43 dose calculation formalism); homogeneous medium with line sources (TPS with 2D TG‐43 dose calculation formalism and MC codes); and plaque heterogeneity‐corrected line sources (Plaque Simulator with modified 2D TG‐43 dose calculation formalism and MC codes). Comparisons were made of doses calculated at points‐of‐interest on the plaque central‐axis and at off‐axis points of clinical interest within a standardized model of the right eye. Results: For the homogeneous water medium case, agreement was within for the point‐ and line‐source models when comparing between TPS and between TPS and MC codes, respectively. For the heterogeneous medium case, dose differences (as calculated using the MC codes and Plaque Simulator) differ by up to 37% on the central‐axis in comparison to the homogeneous water calculations. A prescription dose of 85 Gy at 5 mm depth based on calculations in a homogeneous medium delivers 76 Gy and 67 Gy for specific and sources, respectively, when accounting for COMS‐plaque heterogeneities. For off‐axis points‐of‐interest, dose differences approached factors of 7 and 12 at some positions for and , respectively. There was good agreement ( ) among MC codes and Plaque Simulator results when appropriate parameters calculated using MC codes were input into Plaque Simulator. Plaque Simulator and MC users are perhaps at risk of overdosing patients up to 20% if heterogeneity corrections are used and the prescribed dose is not modified appropriately. Conclusions: Agreement within 2% was observed among conventional brachytherapy TPS and MC codes for intraocular brachytherapy dose calculations in a homogeneous water environment. In general, the magnitude of dose errors incurred by ignoring the effect of the plaque backing and Silastic insert (i.e., by using the TG‐43 approach) increased with distance from the plaque's central‐axis. Considering the presence of material heterogeneities in a typical eye plaque, the best method in this study for dose calculations is a verified MC simulation." @default.
• W2055464904 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5000404812 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5002623840 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5003502403 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5018422765 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5025626286 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5033647218 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5054826640 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5074488614 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5082539797 @default.
• W2055464904 creator A5089288351 @default.
• W2055464904 date "2010-12-21" @default.
• W2055464904 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2055464904 title "Comparison of dose calculation methods for brachytherapy of intraocular tumors" @default.
• W2055464904 cites W121733475 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W180642312 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W1965013824 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W1974321472 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W1979600230 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W1980930996 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W1988593853 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2002360051 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2005234481 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2014117109 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2015593026 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2024630611 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2028416073 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2034196969 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2055210663 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2075322822 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2082186719 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2105269005 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2123934092 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2126209042 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2141333002 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2141878909 @default.
• W2055464904 cites W2562156357 @default.
• W2055464904 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3523614" @default.
• W2055464904 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3021559" @default.
• W2055464904 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21361199" @default.
• W2055464904 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2055464904 type Work @default.
• W2055464904 sameAs 2055464904 @default.
• W2055464904 citedByCount "61" @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042012 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042013 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042014 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042015 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042016 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042017 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042018 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042019 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042020 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042021 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042022 @default.
• W2055464904 countsByYear W20554649042023 @default.
• W2055464904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5000404812 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5002623840 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5003502403 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5018422765 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5025626286 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5033647218 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5054826640 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5074488614 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5082539797 @default.
• W2055464904 hasAuthorship W2055464904A5089288351 @default.
• W2055464904 hasBestOaLocation W20554649042 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C2777416452 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C558565934 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C66882249 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C73301696 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C105795698 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C114614502 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C126838900 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C136229726 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C142362112 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C153349607 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C19499675 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C19527891 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C201645570 @default.
• W2055464904 hasConceptScore W2055464904C2777416452 @default.

• next